Some grammar and clarifications.

This commit is contained in:
Jorik Schellekens 2020-03-30 11:52:23 +01:00
parent d9fbbe1696
commit 6ed81eadbf

View file

@ -41,15 +41,15 @@ When reviewing code, here are some things we look for and also things we avoid:
### Workflow ### Workflow
* Authors should request review from riot-web team by default (if someone on the * Authors should request review from the riot-web team by default (if someone on
team is clearly the expert in an area, a direct review request to them may be the team is clearly the expert in an area, a direct review request to them may
more appropriate) be more appropriate)
* Reviewers should remove the team review request and request review from * Reviewers should remove the team review request and request review from
themselves when starting a review to avoid double review themselves when starting a review to avoid double review
* Authors should link to other layers of their PR in their PR before requesting * If there are multiple related PRs authors should reference each of the PRs in
review. Reviewers might be coming from different places and could miss other the others before requesting review. Reviewers might start reviewing from
required PRs. different places and could miss other required PRs.
* Avoid force pushing to a PR after first round of review * Avoid force pushing to a PR after the first round of review
* Use the GitHub default of merge commits when landing (avoid alternate options * Use the GitHub default of merge commits when landing (avoid alternate options
like squash or rebase) like squash or rebase)
* PR author merges after review (assuming they have write access) * PR author merges after review (assuming they have write access)