Merge 99ed0128cf into 3aae60f17b

Per MSC3967, which is now stable, we should not require UIA when
uploading cross-signing keys for the first time.

Fixes: #17227

changelog.d/17284.feature

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+Do not require user-interactive authentication for uploading cross-signing keys for the first time, per MSC3967.

changelog.d/17293.feature

@@ -0,0 +1 @@
+Add `stream_ordering` sort to experimental [MSC3575](https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-spec-proposals/pull/3575) Sliding Sync `/sync` endpoint.

synapse/config/experimental.py

@@ -393,9 +393,6 @@ class ExperimentalConfig(Config):
         # MSC3391: Removing account data.
         self.msc3391_enabled = experimental.get("msc3391_enabled", False)
 
-        # MSC3967: Do not require UIA when first uploading cross signing keys
-        self.msc3967_enabled = experimental.get("msc3967_enabled", False)
-
         # MSC3861: Matrix architecture change to delegate authentication via OIDC
         try:
             self.msc3861 = MSC3861(**experimental.get("msc3861", {}))

synapse/handlers/message.py

@@ -201,7 +201,7 @@ class MessageHandler:
 
         if at_token:
             last_event_id = (
-                await self.store.get_last_event_in_room_before_stream_ordering(
+                await self.store.get_last_event_id_in_room_before_stream_ordering(
                     room_id,
                     end_token=at_token.room_key,
                 )

synapse/handlers/sliding_sync.py

@@ -18,13 +18,20 @@
 #
 #
 import logging
-from typing import TYPE_CHECKING, AbstractSet, Dict, List, Optional
+from typing import TYPE_CHECKING, Dict, List, Optional, Tuple
 
 from immutabledict import immutabledict
 
 from synapse.api.constants import AccountDataTypes, Membership
 from synapse.events import EventBase
-from synapse.types import Requester, RoomStreamToken, StreamToken, UserID
+from synapse.storage.roommember import RoomsForUser
+from synapse.types import (
+    PersistedEventPosition,
+    Requester,
+    RoomStreamToken,
+    StreamToken,
+    UserID,
+)
 from synapse.types.handlers import OperationType, SlidingSyncConfig, SlidingSyncResult
 
 if TYPE_CHECKING:
@@ -33,6 +40,27 @@ if TYPE_CHECKING:
 logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)
 
 
+def convert_event_to_rooms_for_user(event: EventBase) -> RoomsForUser:
+    """
+    Quick helper to convert an event to a `RoomsForUser` object.
+    """
+    # These fields should be present for all persisted events
+    assert event.internal_metadata.stream_ordering is not None
+    assert event.internal_metadata.instance_name is not None
+
+    return RoomsForUser(
+        room_id=event.room_id,
+        sender=event.sender,
+        membership=event.membership,
+        event_id=event.event_id,
+        event_pos=PersistedEventPosition(
+            event.internal_metadata.instance_name,
+            event.internal_metadata.stream_ordering,
+        ),
+        room_version_id=event.room_version.identifier,
+    )
+
+
 def filter_membership_for_sync(*, membership: str, user_id: str, sender: str) -> bool:
     """
     Returns True if the membership event should be included in the sync response,
@@ -169,26 +197,28 @@ class SlidingSyncHandler:
             # See https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-doc/issues/1144
             raise NotImplementedError()
 
-        # Get all of the room IDs that the user should be able to see in the sync
-        # response
-        room_id_set = await self.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
-            sync_config.user,
-            from_token=from_token,
-            to_token=to_token,
-        )
-
         # Assemble sliding window lists
         lists: Dict[str, SlidingSyncResult.SlidingWindowList] = {}
         if sync_config.lists:
+            # Get all of the room IDs that the user should be able to see in the sync
+            # response
+            sync_room_map = await self.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
+                sync_config.user,
+                from_token=from_token,
+                to_token=to_token,
+            )
+
             for list_key, list_config in sync_config.lists.items():
                 # Apply filters
-                filtered_room_ids = room_id_set
+                filtered_sync_room_map = sync_room_map
                 if list_config.filters is not None:
-                    filtered_room_ids = await self.filter_rooms(
-                        sync_config.user, room_id_set, list_config.filters, to_token
+                    filtered_sync_room_map = await self.filter_rooms(
+                        sync_config.user, sync_room_map, list_config.filters, to_token
                     )
-                # TODO: Apply sorts
-                sorted_room_ids = sorted(filtered_room_ids)
+
+                sorted_room_info = await self.sort_rooms(
+                    filtered_sync_room_map, to_token
+                )
 
                 ops: List[SlidingSyncResult.SlidingWindowList.Operation] = []
                 if list_config.ranges:
@@ -197,12 +227,17 @@ class SlidingSyncHandler:
                             SlidingSyncResult.SlidingWindowList.Operation(
                                 op=OperationType.SYNC,
                                 range=range,
-                                room_ids=sorted_room_ids[range[0] : range[1]],
+                                room_ids=[
+                                    room_id
+                                    for room_id, _ in sorted_room_info[
+                                        range[0] : range[1]
+                                    ]
+                                ],
                             )
                         )
 
                 lists[list_key] = SlidingSyncResult.SlidingWindowList(
-                    count=len(sorted_room_ids),
+                    count=len(sorted_room_info),
                     ops=ops,
                 )
 
@@ -219,7 +254,7 @@ class SlidingSyncHandler:
         user: UserID,
         to_token: StreamToken,
         from_token: Optional[StreamToken] = None,
-    ) -> AbstractSet[str]:
+    ) -> Dict[str, RoomsForUser]:
         """
         Fetch room IDs that should be listed for this user in the sync response (the
         full room list that will be filtered, sorted, and sliced).
@@ -237,11 +272,14 @@ class SlidingSyncHandler:
           to tell when a room was forgotten at the moment so we can't factor it into the
           from/to range.
 
-
         Args:
             user: User to fetch rooms for
             to_token: The token to fetch rooms up to.
             from_token: The point in the stream to sync from.
+
+        Returns:
+            A dictionary of room IDs that should be listed in the sync response along
+            with membership information in that room at the time of `to_token`.
         """
         user_id = user.to_string()
 
@@ -261,11 +299,11 @@ class SlidingSyncHandler:
 
         # If the user has never joined any rooms before, we can just return an empty list
         if not room_for_user_list:
-            return set()
+            return {}
 
         # Our working list of rooms that can show up in the sync response
         sync_room_id_set = {
-            room_for_user.room_id
+            room_for_user.room_id: room_for_user
             for room_for_user in room_for_user_list
             if filter_membership_for_sync(
                 membership=room_for_user.membership,
@@ -415,7 +453,9 @@ class SlidingSyncHandler:
                 not was_last_membership_already_included
                 and should_prev_membership_be_included
             ):
-                sync_room_id_set.add(room_id)
+                sync_room_id_set[room_id] = convert_event_to_rooms_for_user(
+                    last_membership_change_after_to_token
+                )
             # 1b) Remove rooms that the user joined (hasn't left) after the `to_token`
             #
             # For example, if the last membership event after the `to_token` is a "join"
@@ -426,7 +466,7 @@ class SlidingSyncHandler:
                 was_last_membership_already_included
                 and not should_prev_membership_be_included
             ):
-                sync_room_id_set.discard(room_id)
+                del sync_room_id_set[room_id]
 
         # 2) -----------------------------------------------------
         # We fix-up newly_left rooms after the first fixup because it may have removed
@@ -461,25 +501,32 @@ class SlidingSyncHandler:
             # include newly_left rooms because the last event that the user should see
             # is their own leave event
             if last_membership_change_in_from_to_range.membership == Membership.LEAVE:
-                sync_room_id_set.add(room_id)
+                sync_room_id_set[room_id] = convert_event_to_rooms_for_user(
+                    last_membership_change_in_from_to_range
+                )
 
         return sync_room_id_set
 
     async def filter_rooms(
         self,
         user: UserID,
-        room_id_set: AbstractSet[str],
+        sync_room_map: Dict[str, RoomsForUser],
         filters: SlidingSyncConfig.SlidingSyncList.Filters,
         to_token: StreamToken,
-    ) -> AbstractSet[str]:
+    ) -> Dict[str, RoomsForUser]:
         """
         Filter rooms based on the sync request.
 
         Args:
             user: User to filter rooms for
-            room_id_set: Set of room IDs to filter down
+            sync_room_map: Dictionary of room IDs to sort along with membership
+                information in the room at the time of `to_token`.
             filters: Filters to apply
             to_token: We filter based on the state of the room at this token
+
+        Returns:
+            A filtered dictionary of room IDs along with membership information in the
+            room at the time of `to_token`.
         """
         user_id = user.to_string()
 
@@ -488,7 +535,7 @@ class SlidingSyncHandler:
         # TODO: Exclude partially stated rooms unless the `required_state` has
         # `["m.room.member", "$LAZY"]`
 
-        filtered_room_id_set = set(room_id_set)
+        filtered_room_id_set = set(sync_room_map.keys())
 
         # Filter for Direct-Message (DM) rooms
         if filters.is_dm is not None:
@@ -544,4 +591,60 @@ class SlidingSyncHandler:
         if filters.not_tags:
             raise NotImplementedError()
 
-        return filtered_room_id_set
+        # Assemble a new sync room map but only with the `filtered_room_id_set`
+        return {room_id: sync_room_map[room_id] for room_id in filtered_room_id_set}
+
+    async def sort_rooms(
+        self,
+        sync_room_map: Dict[str, RoomsForUser],
+        to_token: StreamToken,
+    ) -> List[Tuple[str, RoomsForUser]]:
+        """
+        Sort by stream_ordering of the last event in the room. In order to get
+        a stable sort, we tie-break by room ID.
+
+        Args:
+            sync_room_map: Dictionary of room IDs to sort along with membership
+                information in the room at the time of `to_token`.
+            to_token: We sort based on the events in the room at this token (<= `to_token`)
+
+        Returns:
+            A sorted list of room IDs by stream_ordering along with membership information.
+        """
+
+        # Assemble a map of room ID to the `stream_ordering` of the last activity that the
+        # user should see in the room (<= `to_token`)
+        last_activity_in_room_map: Dict[str, int] = {}
+        for room_id, room_for_user in sync_room_map.items():
+            # If they are fully-joined to the room, let's find the latest activity
+            # at/before the `to_token`.
+            if room_for_user.membership == Membership.JOIN:
+                last_event_result = (
+                    await self.store.get_last_event_in_room_before_stream_ordering(
+                        room_id, to_token.room_key
+                    )
+                )
+
+                # If the room has no events at/before the `to_token`, this is probably a
+                # mistake in the code that generates the `sync_room_map` since that should
+                # only give us rooms that the user had membership in during the token range.
+                assert last_event_result is not None
+
+                _, event_pos = last_event_result
+
+                last_activity_in_room_map[room_id] = event_pos.stream
+            else:
+                # Otherwise, if the user has left/been invited/knocked/been banned from
+                # a room, they shouldn't see anything past that point.
+                last_activity_in_room_map[room_id] = room_for_user.event_pos.stream
+
+        return sorted(
+            sync_room_map.items(),
+            # Sort by the last activity (stream_ordering) in the room, tie-break on room_id
+            key=lambda room_info: (
+                last_activity_in_room_map[room_info[0]],
+                room_info[0],
+            ),
+            # We want descending order
+            reverse=True,
+        )

synapse/handlers/sync.py

@@ -1036,9 +1036,11 @@ class SyncHandler:
         # FIXME: This gets the state at the latest event before the stream ordering,
         # which might not be the same as the "current state" of the room at the time
         # of the stream token if there were multiple forward extremities at the time.
-        last_event_id = await self.store.get_last_event_in_room_before_stream_ordering(
-            room_id,
-            end_token=stream_position.room_key,
+        last_event_id = (
+            await self.store.get_last_event_id_in_room_before_stream_ordering(
+                room_id,
+                end_token=stream_position.room_key,
+            )
         )
 
         if last_event_id:
@@ -1519,7 +1521,7 @@ class SyncHandler:
             # We need to make sure the first event in our batch points to the
             # last event in the previous batch.
             last_event_id_prev_batch = (
-                await self.store.get_last_event_in_room_before_stream_ordering(
+                await self.store.get_last_event_id_in_room_before_stream_ordering(
                     room_id,
                     end_token=since_token.room_key,
                 )

synapse/rest/admin/experimental_features.py

@@ -41,7 +41,6 @@ class ExperimentalFeature(str, Enum):
 
     MSC3026 = "msc3026"
     MSC3881 = "msc3881"
-    MSC3967 = "msc3967"
 
 
 class ExperimentalFeaturesRestServlet(RestServlet):

synapse/rest/client/keys.py

@@ -382,44 +382,35 @@ class SigningKeyUploadServlet(RestServlet):
             master_key_updatable_without_uia,
         ) = await self.e2e_keys_handler.check_cross_signing_setup(user_id)
 
-        # Before MSC3967 we required UIA both when setting up cross signing for the
-        # first time and when resetting the device signing key. With MSC3967 we only
-        # require UIA when resetting cross-signing, and not when setting up the first
-        # time. Because there is no UIA in MSC3861, for now we throw an error if the
-        # user tries to reset the device signing key when MSC3861 is enabled, but allow
-        # first-time setup.
-        if self.hs.config.experimental.msc3861.enabled:
-            # The auth service has to explicitly mark the master key as replaceable
-            # without UIA to reset the device signing key with MSC3861.
-            if is_cross_signing_setup and not master_key_updatable_without_uia:
-                config = self.hs.config.experimental.msc3861
-                if config.account_management_url is not None:
-                    url = f"{config.account_management_url}?action=org.matrix.cross_signing_reset"
-                else:
-                    url = config.issuer
+        # Resending exactly the same keys should just 200 OK without doing a UIA prompt.
+        keys_are_different = await self.e2e_keys_handler.has_different_keys(
+            user_id, body
+        )
+        if not keys_are_different:
+            return 200, {}
 
-                raise SynapseError(
-                    HTTPStatus.NOT_IMPLEMENTED,
-                    "To reset your end-to-end encryption cross-signing identity, "
-                    f"you first need to approve it at {url} and then try again.",
-                    Codes.UNRECOGNIZED,
-                )
-            # But first-time setup is fine
+        # The keys are different; is x-signing set up? If no, then this is first-time
+        # setup, and that is allowed without UIA, per MSC3967.
+        # If yes, then we need to authenticate the change.
+        if is_cross_signing_setup:
+            # With MSC3861, UIA is not possible. Instead, the auth service has to
+            # explicitly mark the master key as replaceable.
+            if self.hs.config.experimental.msc3861.enabled:
+                if not master_key_updatable_without_uia:
+                    config = self.hs.config.experimental.msc3861
+                    if config.account_management_url is not None:
+                        url = f"{config.account_management_url}?action=org.matrix.cross_signing_reset"
+                    else:
+                        url = config.issuer
 
-        elif self.hs.config.experimental.msc3967_enabled:
-            # MSC3967 allows this endpoint to 200 OK for idempotency. Resending exactly the same
-            # keys should just 200 OK without doing a UIA prompt.
-            keys_are_different = await self.e2e_keys_handler.has_different_keys(
-                user_id, body
-            )
-            if not keys_are_different:
-                # FIXME: we do not fallthrough to upload_signing_keys_for_user because confusingly
-                # if we do, we 500 as it looks like it tries to INSERT the same key twice, causing a
-                # unique key constraint violation. This sounds like a bug?
-                return 200, {}
-            # the keys are different, is x-signing set up? If no, then the keys don't exist which is
-            # why they are different. If yes, then we need to UIA to change them.
-            if is_cross_signing_setup:
+                    raise SynapseError(
+                        HTTPStatus.NOT_IMPLEMENTED,
+                        "To reset your end-to-end encryption cross-signing identity, "
+                        f"you first need to approve it at {url} and then try again.",
+                        Codes.UNRECOGNIZED,
+                    )
+            else:
+                # Without MSC3861, we require UIA.
                 await self.auth_handler.validate_user_via_ui_auth(
                     requester,
                     request,
@@ -428,18 +419,6 @@ class SigningKeyUploadServlet(RestServlet):
                     # Do not allow skipping of UIA auth.
                     can_skip_ui_auth=False,
                 )
-            # Otherwise we don't require UIA since we are setting up cross signing for first time
-        else:
-            # Previous behaviour is to always require UIA but allow it to be skipped
-            await self.auth_handler.validate_user_via_ui_auth(
-                requester,
-                request,
-                body,
-                "add a device signing key to your account",
-                # Allow skipping of UI auth since this is frequently called directly
-                # after login and it is silly to ask users to re-auth immediately.
-                can_skip_ui_auth=True,
-            )
 
         result = await self.e2e_keys_handler.upload_signing_keys_for_user(user_id, body)
         return 200, result

synapse/storage/databases/main/stream.py

@@ -895,7 +895,7 @@ class StreamWorkerStore(EventsWorkerStore, SQLBaseStore):
             "get_room_event_before_stream_ordering", _f
         )
 
-    async def get_last_event_in_room_before_stream_ordering(
+    async def get_last_event_id_in_room_before_stream_ordering(
         self,
         room_id: str,
         end_token: RoomStreamToken,
@@ -910,10 +910,36 @@ class StreamWorkerStore(EventsWorkerStore, SQLBaseStore):
             The ID of the most recent event, or None if there are no events in the room
             before this stream ordering.
         """
+        last_event_result = await self.get_last_event_in_room_before_stream_ordering(
+            room_id, end_token
+        )
+
+        if last_event_result:
+            return last_event_result[0]
+
+        return None
+
+    async def get_last_event_in_room_before_stream_ordering(
+        self,
+        room_id: str,
+        end_token: RoomStreamToken,
+    ) -> Optional[Tuple[str, PersistedEventPosition]]:
+        """
+        Returns the ID and event position of the last event in a room at or before a
+        stream ordering.
+
+        Args:
+            room_id
+            end_token: The token used to stream from
+
+        Returns:
+            The ID of the most recent event and it's position, or None if there are no
+            events in the room before this stream ordering.
+        """
 
         def get_last_event_in_room_before_stream_ordering_txn(
             txn: LoggingTransaction,
-        ) -> Optional[str]:
+        ) -> Optional[Tuple[str, PersistedEventPosition]]:
             # We're looking for the closest event at or before the token. We need to
             # handle the fact that the stream token can be a vector clock (with an
             # `instance_map`) and events can be persisted on different instances
@@ -975,7 +1001,9 @@ class StreamWorkerStore(EventsWorkerStore, SQLBaseStore):
                     topological_ordering=topological_ordering,
                     stream_ordering=stream_ordering,
                 ):
-                    return event_id
+                    return event_id, PersistedEventPosition(
+                        instance_name, stream_ordering
+                    )
 
             return None
 

synapse/types/rest/client/__init__.py

@@ -175,22 +175,8 @@ class SlidingSyncBody(RequestBodyModel):
             ranges: Sliding window ranges. If this field is missing, no sliding window
                 is used and all rooms are returned in this list. Integers are
                 *inclusive*.
-            sort: How the list should be sorted on the server. The first value is
-                applied first, then tiebreaks are performed with each subsequent sort
-                listed.
-
-                    FIXME: Furthermore, it's not currently defined how servers should behave
-                    if they encounter a filter or sort operation they do not recognise. If
-                    the server rejects the request with an HTTP 400 then that will break
-                    backwards compatibility with new clients vs old servers. However, the
-                    client would be otherwise unaware that only some of the sort/filter
-                    operations have taken effect. We may need to include a "warnings"
-                    section to indicate which sort/filter operations are unrecognised,
-                    allowing for some form of graceful degradation of service.
-                    -- https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-spec-proposals/blob/kegan/sync-v3/proposals/3575-sync.md#filter-and-sort-extensions
-
             slow_get_all_rooms: Just get all rooms (for clients that don't want to deal with
-                sliding windows). When true, the `ranges` and `sort` fields are ignored.
+                sliding windows). When true, the `ranges` field is ignored.
             required_state: Required state for each room returned. An array of event
                 type and state key tuples. Elements in this array are ORd together to
                 produce the final set of state events to return.
@@ -229,12 +215,6 @@ class SlidingSyncBody(RequestBodyModel):
                 `user_id` and optionally `avatar_url` and `displayname`) for the users used
                 to calculate the room name.
             filters: Filters to apply to the list before sorting.
-            bump_event_types: Allowlist of event types which should be considered recent activity
-                when sorting `by_recency`. By omitting event types from this field,
-                clients can ensure that uninteresting events (e.g. a profile rename) do
-                not cause a room to jump to the top of its list(s). Empty or omitted
-                `bump_event_types` have no effect—all events in a room will be
-                considered recent activity.
         """
 
         class Filters(RequestBodyModel):
@@ -300,11 +280,9 @@ class SlidingSyncBody(RequestBodyModel):
             ranges: Optional[List[Tuple[int, int]]] = None
         else:
             ranges: Optional[List[Tuple[conint(ge=0, strict=True), conint(ge=0, strict=True)]]] = None  # type: ignore[valid-type]
-        sort: Optional[List[StrictStr]] = None
         slow_get_all_rooms: Optional[StrictBool] = False
         include_heroes: Optional[StrictBool] = False
         filters: Optional[Filters] = None
-        bump_event_types: Optional[List[StrictStr]] = None
 
     class RoomSubscription(CommonRoomParameters):
         pass

tests/handlers/test_oauth_delegation.py

@@ -541,6 +541,8 @@ class MSC3861OAuthDelegation(HomeserverTestCase):
 
         self.assertEqual(channel.code, 200, channel.json_body)
 
+        # Try uploading *different* keys; it should cause a 501 error.
+        keys_upload_body = self.make_device_keys(USER_ID, DEVICE)
         channel = self.make_request(
             "POST",
             "/_matrix/client/v3/keys/device_signing/upload",

tests/handlers/test_sliding_sync.py

@@ -20,6 +20,8 @@
 import logging
 from unittest.mock import patch
 
+from parameterized import parameterized
+
 from twisted.test.proto_helpers import MemoryReactor
 
 from synapse.api.constants import AccountDataTypes, EventTypes, JoinRules, Membership
@@ -79,7 +81,7 @@ class GetSyncRoomIdsForUserTestCase(HomeserverTestCase):
             )
         )
 
-        self.assertEqual(room_id_results, set())
+        self.assertEqual(room_id_results.keys(), set())
 
     def test_get_newly_joined_room(self) -> None:
         """
@@ -103,7 +105,7 @@ class GetSyncRoomIdsForUserTestCase(HomeserverTestCase):
             )
         )
 
-        self.assertEqual(room_id_results, {room_id})
+        self.assertEqual(room_id_results.keys(), {room_id})
 
     def test_get_already_joined_room(self) -> None:
         """
@@ -124,7 +126,7 @@ class GetSyncRoomIdsForUserTestCase(HomeserverTestCase):
             )
         )
 
-        self.assertEqual(room_id_results, {room_id})
+        self.assertEqual(room_id_results.keys(), {room_id})
 
     def test_get_invited_banned_knocked_room(self) -> None:
         """
@@ -180,7 +182,7 @@ class GetSyncRoomIdsForUserTestCase(HomeserverTestCase):
 
         # Ensure that the invited, ban, and knock rooms show up
         self.assertEqual(
-            room_id_results,
+            room_id_results.keys(),
             {
                 invited_room_id,
                 ban_room_id,
@@ -226,7 +228,7 @@ class GetSyncRoomIdsForUserTestCase(HomeserverTestCase):
         )
 
         # The kicked room should show up
-        self.assertEqual(room_id_results, {kick_room_id})
+        self.assertEqual(room_id_results.keys(), {kick_room_id})
 
     def test_forgotten_rooms(self) -> None:
         """
@@ -308,7 +310,7 @@ class GetSyncRoomIdsForUserTestCase(HomeserverTestCase):
         )
 
         # We shouldn't see the room because it was forgotten
-        self.assertEqual(room_id_results, set())
+        self.assertEqual(room_id_results.keys(), set())
 
     def test_only_newly_left_rooms_show_up(self) -> None:
         """
@@ -340,7 +342,7 @@ class GetSyncRoomIdsForUserTestCase(HomeserverTestCase):
         )
 
         # Only the newly_left room should show up
-        self.assertEqual(room_id_results, {room_id2})
+        self.assertEqual(room_id_results.keys(), {room_id2})
 
     def test_no_joins_after_to_token(self) -> None:
         """
@@ -368,7 +370,7 @@ class GetSyncRoomIdsForUserTestCase(HomeserverTestCase):
             )
         )
 
-        self.assertEqual(room_id_results, {room_id1})
+        self.assertEqual(room_id_results.keys(), {room_id1})
 
     def test_join_during_range_and_left_room_after_to_token(self) -> None:
         """
@@ -398,7 +400,7 @@ class GetSyncRoomIdsForUserTestCase(HomeserverTestCase):
 
         # We should still see the room because we were joined during the
         # from_token/to_token time period.
-        self.assertEqual(room_id_results, {room_id1})
+        self.assertEqual(room_id_results.keys(), {room_id1})
 
     def test_join_before_range_and_left_room_after_to_token(self) -> None:
         """
@@ -425,7 +427,7 @@ class GetSyncRoomIdsForUserTestCase(HomeserverTestCase):
         )
 
         # We should still see the room because we were joined before the `from_token`
-        self.assertEqual(room_id_results, {room_id1})
+        self.assertEqual(room_id_results.keys(), {room_id1})
 
     def test_kicked_before_range_and_left_after_to_token(self) -> None:
         """
@@ -473,7 +475,7 @@ class GetSyncRoomIdsForUserTestCase(HomeserverTestCase):
         )
 
         # We shouldn't see the room because it was forgotten
-        self.assertEqual(room_id_results, {kick_room_id})
+        self.assertEqual(room_id_results.keys(), {kick_room_id})
 
     def test_newly_left_during_range_and_join_leave_after_to_token(self) -> None:
         """
@@ -510,7 +512,7 @@ class GetSyncRoomIdsForUserTestCase(HomeserverTestCase):
         )
 
         # Room should still show up because it's newly_left during the from/to range
-        self.assertEqual(room_id_results, {room_id1})
+        self.assertEqual(room_id_results.keys(), {room_id1})
 
     def test_newly_left_during_range_and_join_after_to_token(self) -> None:
         """
@@ -546,7 +548,7 @@ class GetSyncRoomIdsForUserTestCase(HomeserverTestCase):
         )
 
         # Room should still show up because it's newly_left during the from/to range
-        self.assertEqual(room_id_results, {room_id1})
+        self.assertEqual(room_id_results.keys(), {room_id1})
 
     def test_no_from_token(self) -> None:
         """
@@ -587,7 +589,7 @@ class GetSyncRoomIdsForUserTestCase(HomeserverTestCase):
         )
 
         # Only rooms we were joined to before the `to_token` should show up
-        self.assertEqual(room_id_results, {room_id1})
+        self.assertEqual(room_id_results.keys(), {room_id1})
 
     def test_from_token_ahead_of_to_token(self) -> None:
         """
@@ -648,7 +650,7 @@ class GetSyncRoomIdsForUserTestCase(HomeserverTestCase):
         #
         # There won't be any newly_left rooms because the `from_token` is ahead of the
         # `to_token` and that range will give no membership changes to check.
-        self.assertEqual(room_id_results, {room_id1})
+        self.assertEqual(room_id_results.keys(), {room_id1})
 
     def test_leave_before_range_and_join_leave_after_to_token(self) -> None:
         """
@@ -683,7 +685,7 @@ class GetSyncRoomIdsForUserTestCase(HomeserverTestCase):
         )
 
         # Room shouldn't show up because it was left before the `from_token`
-        self.assertEqual(room_id_results, set())
+        self.assertEqual(room_id_results.keys(), set())
 
     def test_leave_before_range_and_join_after_to_token(self) -> None:
         """
@@ -717,7 +719,7 @@ class GetSyncRoomIdsForUserTestCase(HomeserverTestCase):
         )
 
         # Room shouldn't show up because it was left before the `from_token`
-        self.assertEqual(room_id_results, set())
+        self.assertEqual(room_id_results.keys(), set())
 
     def test_join_leave_multiple_times_during_range_and_after_to_token(
         self,
@@ -759,7 +761,7 @@ class GetSyncRoomIdsForUserTestCase(HomeserverTestCase):
         )
 
         # Room should show up because it was newly_left and joined during the from/to range
-        self.assertEqual(room_id_results, {room_id1})
+        self.assertEqual(room_id_results.keys(), {room_id1})
 
     def test_join_leave_multiple_times_before_range_and_after_to_token(
         self,
@@ -799,7 +801,7 @@ class GetSyncRoomIdsForUserTestCase(HomeserverTestCase):
         )
 
         # Room should show up because we were joined before the from/to range
-        self.assertEqual(room_id_results, {room_id1})
+        self.assertEqual(room_id_results.keys(), {room_id1})
 
     def test_invite_before_range_and_join_leave_after_to_token(
         self,
@@ -836,7 +838,7 @@ class GetSyncRoomIdsForUserTestCase(HomeserverTestCase):
         )
 
         # Room should show up because we were invited before the from/to range
-        self.assertEqual(room_id_results, {room_id1})
+        self.assertEqual(room_id_results.keys(), {room_id1})
 
     def test_multiple_rooms_are_not_confused(
         self,
@@ -889,7 +891,7 @@ class GetSyncRoomIdsForUserTestCase(HomeserverTestCase):
         )
 
         self.assertEqual(
-            room_id_results,
+            room_id_results.keys(),
             {
                 # `room_id1` shouldn't show up because we left before the from/to range
                 #
@@ -1048,7 +1050,6 @@ class GetSyncRoomIdsForUserEventShardTestCase(BaseMultiWorkerStreamTestCase):
 
         # Get a token while things are stuck after our activity
         stuck_activity_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
-        logger.info("stuck_activity_token %s", stuck_activity_token)
         # Let's make sure we're working with a token that has an `instance_map`
         self.assertNotEqual(len(stuck_activity_token.room_key.instance_map), 0)
 
@@ -1058,7 +1059,6 @@ class GetSyncRoomIdsForUserEventShardTestCase(BaseMultiWorkerStreamTestCase):
         join_on_worker2_pos = self.get_success(
             self.store.get_position_for_event(join_on_worker2_response["event_id"])
         )
-        logger.info("join_on_worker2_pos %s", join_on_worker2_pos)
         # Ensure the join technially came after our token
         self.assertGreater(
             join_on_worker2_pos.stream,
@@ -1077,7 +1077,6 @@ class GetSyncRoomIdsForUserEventShardTestCase(BaseMultiWorkerStreamTestCase):
         join_on_worker3_pos = self.get_success(
             self.store.get_position_for_event(join_on_worker3_response["event_id"])
         )
-        logger.info("join_on_worker3_pos %s", join_on_worker3_pos)
         # Ensure the join came after the min but still encapsulated by the token
         self.assertGreaterEqual(
             join_on_worker3_pos.stream,
@@ -1103,7 +1102,7 @@ class GetSyncRoomIdsForUserEventShardTestCase(BaseMultiWorkerStreamTestCase):
         )
 
         self.assertEqual(
-            room_id_results,
+            room_id_results.keys(),
             {
                 room_id1,
                 # room_id2 shouldn't show up because we left before the from/to range
@@ -1217,11 +1216,20 @@ class FilterRoomsTestCase(HomeserverTestCase):
 
         after_rooms_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
 
+        # Get the rooms the user should be syncing with
+        sync_room_map = self.get_success(
+            self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
+                UserID.from_string(user1_id),
+                from_token=None,
+                to_token=after_rooms_token,
+            )
+        )
+
         # Try with `is_dm=True`
-        truthy_filtered_room_ids = self.get_success(
+        truthy_filtered_room_map = self.get_success(
             self.sliding_sync_handler.filter_rooms(
                 UserID.from_string(user1_id),
-                {room_id, dm_room_id},
+                sync_room_map,
                 SlidingSyncConfig.SlidingSyncList.Filters(
                     is_dm=True,
                 ),
@@ -1229,13 +1237,13 @@ class FilterRoomsTestCase(HomeserverTestCase):
             )
         )
 
-        self.assertEqual(truthy_filtered_room_ids, {dm_room_id})
+        self.assertEqual(truthy_filtered_room_map.keys(), {dm_room_id})
 
         # Try with `is_dm=False`
-        falsy_filtered_room_ids = self.get_success(
+        falsy_filtered_room_map = self.get_success(
             self.sliding_sync_handler.filter_rooms(
                 UserID.from_string(user1_id),
-                {room_id, dm_room_id},
+                sync_room_map,
                 SlidingSyncConfig.SlidingSyncList.Filters(
                     is_dm=False,
                 ),
@@ -1243,4 +1251,160 @@ class FilterRoomsTestCase(HomeserverTestCase):
             )
         )
 
-        self.assertEqual(falsy_filtered_room_ids, {room_id})
+        self.assertEqual(falsy_filtered_room_map.keys(), {room_id})
+
+
+class SortRoomsTestCase(HomeserverTestCase):
+    """
+    Tests Sliding Sync handler `sort_rooms()` to make sure it sorts/orders rooms
+    correctly.
+    """
+
+    servlets = [
+        admin.register_servlets,
+        knock.register_servlets,
+        login.register_servlets,
+        room.register_servlets,
+    ]
+
+    def default_config(self) -> JsonDict:
+        config = super().default_config()
+        # Enable sliding sync
+        config["experimental_features"] = {"msc3575_enabled": True}
+        return config
+
+    def prepare(self, reactor: MemoryReactor, clock: Clock, hs: HomeServer) -> None:
+        self.sliding_sync_handler = self.hs.get_sliding_sync_handler()
+        self.store = self.hs.get_datastores().main
+        self.event_sources = hs.get_event_sources()
+
+    def test_sort_activity_basic(self) -> None:
+        """
+        Rooms with newer activity are sorted first.
+        """
+        user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
+        user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
+
+        room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(
+            user1_id,
+            tok=user1_tok,
+        )
+        room_id2 = self.helper.create_room_as(
+            user1_id,
+            tok=user1_tok,
+        )
+
+        after_rooms_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
+
+        # Get the rooms the user should be syncing with
+        sync_room_map = self.get_success(
+            self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
+                UserID.from_string(user1_id),
+                from_token=None,
+                to_token=after_rooms_token,
+            )
+        )
+
+        # Sort the rooms (what we're testing)
+        sorted_room_info = self.get_success(
+            self.sliding_sync_handler.sort_rooms(
+                sync_room_map=sync_room_map,
+                to_token=after_rooms_token,
+            )
+        )
+
+        self.assertEqual(
+            [room_id for room_id, _ in sorted_room_info],
+            [room_id2, room_id1],
+        )
+
+    @parameterized.expand(
+        [
+            (Membership.LEAVE,),
+            (Membership.INVITE,),
+            (Membership.KNOCK,),
+            (Membership.BAN,),
+        ]
+    )
+    def test_activity_after_xxx(self, room1_membership: str) -> None:
+        """
+        When someone has left/been invited/knocked/been banned from a room, they
+        shouldn't take anything into account after that membership event.
+        """
+        user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
+        user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
+        user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
+        user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
+
+        before_rooms_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
+
+        # Create the rooms as user2 so we can have user1 with a clean slate to work from
+        # and join in whatever order we need for the tests.
+        room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True)
+        # If we're testing knocks, set the room to knock
+        if room1_membership == Membership.KNOCK:
+            self.helper.send_state(
+                room_id1,
+                EventTypes.JoinRules,
+                {"join_rule": JoinRules.KNOCK},
+                tok=user2_tok,
+            )
+        room_id2 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True)
+        room_id3 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok, is_public=True)
+
+        # Here is the activity with user1 that will determine the sort of the rooms
+        # (room2, room1, room3)
+        self.helper.join(room_id3, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
+        if room1_membership == Membership.LEAVE:
+            self.helper.join(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
+            self.helper.leave(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
+        elif room1_membership == Membership.INVITE:
+            self.helper.invite(room_id1, src=user2_id, targ=user1_id, tok=user2_tok)
+        elif room1_membership == Membership.KNOCK:
+            self.helper.knock(room_id1, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
+        elif room1_membership == Membership.BAN:
+            self.helper.ban(room_id1, src=user2_id, targ=user1_id, tok=user2_tok)
+        self.helper.join(room_id2, user1_id, tok=user1_tok)
+
+        # Activity before the token but the user is only been xxx to this room so it
+        # shouldn't be taken into account
+        self.helper.send(room_id1, "activity in room1", tok=user2_tok)
+
+        after_rooms_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
+
+        # Activity after the token. Just make it in a different order than what we
+        # expect to make sure we're not taking the activity after the token into
+        # account.
+        self.helper.send(room_id1, "activity in room1", tok=user2_tok)
+        self.helper.send(room_id2, "activity in room2", tok=user2_tok)
+        self.helper.send(room_id3, "activity in room3", tok=user2_tok)
+
+        # Get the rooms the user should be syncing with
+        sync_room_map = self.get_success(
+            self.sliding_sync_handler.get_sync_room_ids_for_user(
+                UserID.from_string(user1_id),
+                from_token=before_rooms_token,
+                to_token=after_rooms_token,
+            )
+        )
+
+        # Sort the rooms (what we're testing)
+        sorted_room_info = self.get_success(
+            self.sliding_sync_handler.sort_rooms(
+                sync_room_map=sync_room_map,
+                to_token=after_rooms_token,
+            )
+        )
+
+        self.assertEqual(
+            [room_id for room_id, _ in sorted_room_info],
+            [room_id2, room_id1, room_id3],
+            "Corresponding map to disambiguate the opaque room IDs: "
+            + str(
+                {
+                    "room_id1": room_id1,
+                    "room_id2": room_id2,
+                    "room_id3": room_id3,
+                }
+            ),
+        )

tests/rest/admin/test_admin.py

@@ -435,10 +435,6 @@ class ExperimentalFeaturesTestCase(unittest.HomeserverTestCase):
             True,
             channel.json_body["features"]["msc3881"],
         )
-        self.assertEqual(
-            False,
-            channel.json_body["features"]["msc3967"],
-        )
 
         # test nothing blows up if you try to disable a feature that isn't already enabled
         url = f"{self.url}/{self.other_user}"

tests/rest/client/test_keys.py

@@ -155,71 +155,6 @@ class KeyQueryTestCase(unittest.HomeserverTestCase):
         }
 
     def test_device_signing_with_uia(self) -> None:
-        """Device signing key upload requires UIA."""
-        password = "wonderland"
-        device_id = "ABCDEFGHI"
-        alice_id = self.register_user("alice", password)
-        alice_token = self.login("alice", password, device_id=device_id)
-
-        content = self.make_device_keys(alice_id, device_id)
-
-        channel = self.make_request(
-            "POST",
-            "/_matrix/client/v3/keys/device_signing/upload",
-            content,
-            alice_token,
-        )
-
-        self.assertEqual(channel.code, HTTPStatus.UNAUTHORIZED, channel.result)
-        # Grab the session
-        session = channel.json_body["session"]
-        # Ensure that flows are what is expected.
-        self.assertIn({"stages": ["m.login.password"]}, channel.json_body["flows"])
-
-        # add UI auth
-        content["auth"] = {
-            "type": "m.login.password",
-            "identifier": {"type": "m.id.user", "user": alice_id},
-            "password": password,
-            "session": session,
-        }
-
-        channel = self.make_request(
-            "POST",
-            "/_matrix/client/v3/keys/device_signing/upload",
-            content,
-            alice_token,
-        )
-
-        self.assertEqual(channel.code, HTTPStatus.OK, channel.result)
-
-    @override_config({"ui_auth": {"session_timeout": "15m"}})
-    def test_device_signing_with_uia_session_timeout(self) -> None:
-        """Device signing key upload requires UIA buy passes with grace period."""
-        password = "wonderland"
-        device_id = "ABCDEFGHI"
-        alice_id = self.register_user("alice", password)
-        alice_token = self.login("alice", password, device_id=device_id)
-
-        content = self.make_device_keys(alice_id, device_id)
-
-        channel = self.make_request(
-            "POST",
-            "/_matrix/client/v3/keys/device_signing/upload",
-            content,
-            alice_token,
-        )
-
-        self.assertEqual(channel.code, HTTPStatus.OK, channel.result)
-
-    @override_config(
-        {
-            "experimental_features": {"msc3967_enabled": True},
-            "ui_auth": {"session_timeout": "15s"},
-        }
-    )
-    def test_device_signing_with_msc3967(self) -> None:
-        """Device signing key follows MSC3967 behaviour when enabled."""
         password = "wonderland"
         device_id = "ABCDEFGHI"
         alice_id = self.register_user("alice", password)

tests/rest/client/test_sync.py

@@ -1299,7 +1299,6 @@ class SlidingSyncTestCase(unittest.HomeserverTestCase):
                 "lists": {
                     "foo-list": {
                         "ranges": [[0, 99]],
-                        "sort": ["by_notification_level", "by_recency", "by_name"],
                         "required_state": [
                             ["m.room.join_rules", ""],
                             ["m.room.history_visibility", ""],
@@ -1361,7 +1360,6 @@ class SlidingSyncTestCase(unittest.HomeserverTestCase):
                 "lists": {
                     "foo-list": {
                         "ranges": [[0, 99]],
-                        "sort": ["by_notification_level", "by_recency", "by_name"],
                         "required_state": [
                             ["m.room.join_rules", ""],
                             ["m.room.history_visibility", ""],
@@ -1415,14 +1413,12 @@ class SlidingSyncTestCase(unittest.HomeserverTestCase):
                 "lists": {
                     "dms": {
                         "ranges": [[0, 99]],
-                        "sort": ["by_recency"],
                         "required_state": [],
                         "timeline_limit": 1,
                         "filters": {"is_dm": True},
                     },
                     "foo-list": {
                         "ranges": [[0, 99]],
-                        "sort": ["by_recency"],
                         "required_state": [],
                         "timeline_limit": 1,
                         "filters": {"is_dm": False},
@@ -1463,3 +1459,60 @@ class SlidingSyncTestCase(unittest.HomeserverTestCase):
             ],
             list(channel.json_body["lists"]["foo-list"]),
         )
+
+    def test_sort_list(self) -> None:
+        """
+        Test that the lists are sorted by `stream_ordering`
+        """
+        user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
+        user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
+
+        room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(user1_id, tok=user1_tok, is_public=True)
+        room_id2 = self.helper.create_room_as(user1_id, tok=user1_tok, is_public=True)
+        room_id3 = self.helper.create_room_as(user1_id, tok=user1_tok, is_public=True)
+
+        # Activity that will order the rooms
+        self.helper.send(room_id3, "activity in room3", tok=user1_tok)
+        self.helper.send(room_id1, "activity in room1", tok=user1_tok)
+        self.helper.send(room_id2, "activity in room2", tok=user1_tok)
+
+        # Make the Sliding Sync request
+        channel = self.make_request(
+            "POST",
+            self.sync_endpoint,
+            {
+                "lists": {
+                    "foo-list": {
+                        "ranges": [[0, 99]],
+                        "required_state": [
+                            ["m.room.join_rules", ""],
+                            ["m.room.history_visibility", ""],
+                            ["m.space.child", "*"],
+                        ],
+                        "timeline_limit": 1,
+                    }
+                }
+            },
+            access_token=user1_tok,
+        )
+        self.assertEqual(channel.code, 200, channel.json_body)
+
+        # Make sure it has the foo-list we requested
+        self.assertListEqual(
+            list(channel.json_body["lists"].keys()),
+            ["foo-list"],
+            channel.json_body["lists"].keys(),
+        )
+
+        # Make sure the list is sorted in the way we expect
+        self.assertListEqual(
+            list(channel.json_body["lists"]["foo-list"]["ops"]),
+            [
+                {
+                    "op": "SYNC",
+                    "range": [0, 99],
+                    "room_ids": [room_id2, room_id1, room_id3],
+                }
+            ],
+            channel.json_body["lists"]["foo-list"],
+        )

tests/storage/test_stream.py

@@ -336,14 +336,14 @@ class GetLastEventInRoomBeforeStreamOrderingTestCase(HomeserverTestCase):
 
         room_id = self.helper.create_room_as(user1_id, tok=user1_tok, is_public=True)
 
-        last_event = self.get_success(
+        last_event_result = self.get_success(
             self.store.get_last_event_in_room_before_stream_ordering(
                 room_id=room_id,
                 end_token=before_room_token.room_key,
             )
         )
 
-        self.assertIsNone(last_event)
+        self.assertIsNone(last_event_result)
 
     def test_after_room_created(self) -> None:
         """
@@ -356,14 +356,16 @@ class GetLastEventInRoomBeforeStreamOrderingTestCase(HomeserverTestCase):
 
         after_room_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
 
-        last_event = self.get_success(
+        last_event_result = self.get_success(
             self.store.get_last_event_in_room_before_stream_ordering(
                 room_id=room_id,
                 end_token=after_room_token.room_key,
             )
         )
+        assert last_event_result is not None
+        last_event_id, _ = last_event_result
 
-        self.assertIsNotNone(last_event)
+        self.assertIsNotNone(last_event_id)
 
     def test_activity_in_other_rooms(self) -> None:
         """
@@ -380,16 +382,18 @@ class GetLastEventInRoomBeforeStreamOrderingTestCase(HomeserverTestCase):
 
         after_room_token = self.event_sources.get_current_token()
 
-        last_event = self.get_success(
+        last_event_result = self.get_success(
             self.store.get_last_event_in_room_before_stream_ordering(
                 room_id=room_id1,
                 end_token=after_room_token.room_key,
             )
         )
+        assert last_event_result is not None
+        last_event_id, _ = last_event_result
 
         # Make sure it's the event we expect (which also means we know it's from the
         # correct room)
-        self.assertEqual(last_event, event_response["event_id"])
+        self.assertEqual(last_event_id, event_response["event_id"])
 
     def test_activity_after_token_has_no_effect(self) -> None:
         """
@@ -408,15 +412,17 @@ class GetLastEventInRoomBeforeStreamOrderingTestCase(HomeserverTestCase):
         self.helper.send(room_id1, "after1", tok=user1_tok)
         self.helper.send(room_id1, "after2", tok=user1_tok)
 
-        last_event = self.get_success(
+        last_event_result = self.get_success(
             self.store.get_last_event_in_room_before_stream_ordering(
                 room_id=room_id1,
                 end_token=after_room_token.room_key,
             )
         )
+        assert last_event_result is not None
+        last_event_id, _ = last_event_result
 
         # Make sure it's the last event before the token
-        self.assertEqual(last_event, event_response["event_id"])
+        self.assertEqual(last_event_id, event_response["event_id"])
 
     def test_last_event_within_sharded_token(self) -> None:
         """
@@ -457,18 +463,20 @@ class GetLastEventInRoomBeforeStreamOrderingTestCase(HomeserverTestCase):
         self.helper.send(room_id1, "after1", tok=user1_tok)
         self.helper.send(room_id1, "after2", tok=user1_tok)
 
-        last_event = self.get_success(
+        last_event_result = self.get_success(
             self.store.get_last_event_in_room_before_stream_ordering(
                 room_id=room_id1,
                 end_token=end_token,
             )
         )
+        assert last_event_result is not None
+        last_event_id, _ = last_event_result
 
-        # Should find closest event at/before the token in room1
+        # Should find closest event before the token in room1
         self.assertEqual(
-            last_event,
+            last_event_id,
             event_response3["event_id"],
-            f"We expected {event_response3['event_id']} but saw {last_event} which corresponds to "
+            f"We expected {event_response3['event_id']} but saw {last_event_id} which corresponds to "
             + str(
                 {
                     "event1": event_response1["event_id"],
@@ -514,18 +522,20 @@ class GetLastEventInRoomBeforeStreamOrderingTestCase(HomeserverTestCase):
         self.helper.send(room_id1, "after1", tok=user1_tok)
         self.helper.send(room_id1, "after2", tok=user1_tok)
 
-        last_event = self.get_success(
+        last_event_result = self.get_success(
             self.store.get_last_event_in_room_before_stream_ordering(
                 room_id=room_id1,
                 end_token=end_token,
             )
         )
+        assert last_event_result is not None
+        last_event_id, _ = last_event_result
 
-        # Should find closest event at/before the token in room1
+        # Should find closest event before the token in room1
         self.assertEqual(
-            last_event,
+            last_event_id,
             event_response2["event_id"],
-            f"We expected {event_response2['event_id']} but saw {last_event} which corresponds to "
+            f"We expected {event_response2['event_id']} but saw {last_event_id} which corresponds to "
             + str(
                 {
                     "event1": event_response1["event_id"],