synapse/tests/rest/client/sliding_sync/test_rooms_invites.py
Erik Johnston 709b7363fe
Sliding sync: use new DB tables (#17630)
Based on https://github.com/element-hq/synapse/pull/17629

Utilizing the new sliding sync tables added in
https://github.com/element-hq/synapse/pull/17512 for fast acquisition of
rooms for the user and filtering/sorting.

---------

Co-authored-by: Eric Eastwood <eric.eastwood@beta.gouv.fr>
2024-09-01 11:25:39 +01:00

526 lines
21 KiB
Python

#
# This file is licensed under the Affero General Public License (AGPL) version 3.
#
# Copyright (C) 2024 New Vector, Ltd
#
# This program is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify
# it under the terms of the GNU Affero General Public License as
# published by the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the
# License, or (at your option) any later version.
#
# See the GNU Affero General Public License for more details:
# <https://www.gnu.org/licenses/agpl-3.0.html>.
#
import logging
from parameterized import parameterized_class
from twisted.test.proto_helpers import MemoryReactor
import synapse.rest.admin
from synapse.api.constants import EventTypes, HistoryVisibility
from synapse.rest.client import login, room, sync
from synapse.server import HomeServer
from synapse.types import UserID
from synapse.util import Clock
from tests.rest.client.sliding_sync.test_sliding_sync import SlidingSyncBase
logger = logging.getLogger(__name__)
# FIXME: This can be removed once we bump `SCHEMA_COMPAT_VERSION` and run the
# foreground update for
# `sliding_sync_joined_rooms`/`sliding_sync_membership_snapshots` (tracked by
# https://github.com/element-hq/synapse/issues/17623)
@parameterized_class(
("use_new_tables",),
[
(True,),
(False,),
],
class_name_func=lambda cls, num, params_dict: f"{cls.__name__}_{'new' if params_dict['use_new_tables'] else 'fallback'}",
)
class SlidingSyncRoomsInvitesTestCase(SlidingSyncBase):
"""
Test to make sure the `rooms` response looks good for invites in the Sliding Sync API.
Invites behave a lot different than other rooms because we don't include the
`timeline` (`num_live`, `limited`, `prev_batch`) or `required_state` in favor of
some stripped state under the `invite_state` key.
Knocks probably have the same behavior but the spec doesn't mention knocks yet.
"""
servlets = [
synapse.rest.admin.register_servlets,
login.register_servlets,
room.register_servlets,
sync.register_servlets,
]
def prepare(self, reactor: MemoryReactor, clock: Clock, hs: HomeServer) -> None:
self.store = hs.get_datastores().main
self.storage_controllers = hs.get_storage_controllers()
super().prepare(reactor, clock, hs)
def test_rooms_invite_shared_history_initial_sync(self) -> None:
"""
Test that `rooms` we are invited to have some stripped `invite_state` during an
initial sync.
This is an `invite` room so we should only have `stripped_state` (no `timeline`)
but we also shouldn't see any timeline events because the history visiblity is
`shared` and we haven't joined the room yet.
"""
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
user1 = UserID.from_string(user1_id)
user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
user2 = UserID.from_string(user2_id)
room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok)
# Ensure we're testing with a room with `shared` history visibility which means
# history visible until you actually join the room.
history_visibility_response = self.helper.get_state(
room_id1, EventTypes.RoomHistoryVisibility, tok=user2_tok
)
self.assertEqual(
history_visibility_response.get("history_visibility"),
HistoryVisibility.SHARED,
)
self.helper.send(room_id1, "activity before1", tok=user2_tok)
self.helper.send(room_id1, "activity before2", tok=user2_tok)
self.helper.invite(room_id1, src=user2_id, targ=user1_id, tok=user2_tok)
self.helper.send(room_id1, "activity after3", tok=user2_tok)
self.helper.send(room_id1, "activity after4", tok=user2_tok)
# Make the Sliding Sync request
sync_body = {
"lists": {
"foo-list": {
"ranges": [[0, 1]],
"required_state": [],
"timeline_limit": 3,
}
}
}
response_body, _ = self.do_sync(sync_body, tok=user1_tok)
# `timeline` is omitted for `invite` rooms with `stripped_state`
self.assertIsNone(
response_body["rooms"][room_id1].get("timeline"),
response_body["rooms"][room_id1],
)
# `num_live` is omitted for `invite` rooms with `stripped_state` (no timeline anyway)
self.assertIsNone(
response_body["rooms"][room_id1].get("num_live"),
response_body["rooms"][room_id1],
)
# `limited` is omitted for `invite` rooms with `stripped_state` (no timeline anyway)
self.assertIsNone(
response_body["rooms"][room_id1].get("limited"),
response_body["rooms"][room_id1],
)
# `prev_batch` is omitted for `invite` rooms with `stripped_state` (no timeline anyway)
self.assertIsNone(
response_body["rooms"][room_id1].get("prev_batch"),
response_body["rooms"][room_id1],
)
# `required_state` is omitted for `invite` rooms with `stripped_state`
self.assertIsNone(
response_body["rooms"][room_id1].get("required_state"),
response_body["rooms"][room_id1],
)
# We should have some `stripped_state` so the potential joiner can identify the
# room (we don't care about the order).
self.assertCountEqual(
response_body["rooms"][room_id1]["invite_state"],
[
{
"content": {"creator": user2_id, "room_version": "10"},
"sender": user2_id,
"state_key": "",
"type": "m.room.create",
},
{
"content": {"join_rule": "public"},
"sender": user2_id,
"state_key": "",
"type": "m.room.join_rules",
},
{
"content": {"displayname": user2.localpart, "membership": "join"},
"sender": user2_id,
"state_key": user2_id,
"type": "m.room.member",
},
{
"content": {"displayname": user1.localpart, "membership": "invite"},
"sender": user2_id,
"state_key": user1_id,
"type": "m.room.member",
},
],
response_body["rooms"][room_id1]["invite_state"],
)
def test_rooms_invite_shared_history_incremental_sync(self) -> None:
"""
Test that `rooms` we are invited to have some stripped `invite_state` during an
incremental sync.
This is an `invite` room so we should only have `stripped_state` (no `timeline`)
but we also shouldn't see any timeline events because the history visiblity is
`shared` and we haven't joined the room yet.
"""
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
user1 = UserID.from_string(user1_id)
user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
user2 = UserID.from_string(user2_id)
room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(user2_id, tok=user2_tok)
# Ensure we're testing with a room with `shared` history visibility which means
# history visible until you actually join the room.
history_visibility_response = self.helper.get_state(
room_id1, EventTypes.RoomHistoryVisibility, tok=user2_tok
)
self.assertEqual(
history_visibility_response.get("history_visibility"),
HistoryVisibility.SHARED,
)
self.helper.send(room_id1, "activity before invite1", tok=user2_tok)
self.helper.send(room_id1, "activity before invite2", tok=user2_tok)
self.helper.invite(room_id1, src=user2_id, targ=user1_id, tok=user2_tok)
self.helper.send(room_id1, "activity after invite3", tok=user2_tok)
self.helper.send(room_id1, "activity after invite4", tok=user2_tok)
sync_body = {
"lists": {
"foo-list": {
"ranges": [[0, 1]],
"required_state": [],
"timeline_limit": 3,
}
}
}
_, from_token = self.do_sync(sync_body, tok=user1_tok)
self.helper.send(room_id1, "activity after token5", tok=user2_tok)
self.helper.send(room_id1, "activity after toekn6", tok=user2_tok)
# Make the Sliding Sync request
response_body, from_token = self.do_sync(
sync_body, since=from_token, tok=user1_tok
)
# `timeline` is omitted for `invite` rooms with `stripped_state`
self.assertIsNone(
response_body["rooms"][room_id1].get("timeline"),
response_body["rooms"][room_id1],
)
# `num_live` is omitted for `invite` rooms with `stripped_state` (no timeline anyway)
self.assertIsNone(
response_body["rooms"][room_id1].get("num_live"),
response_body["rooms"][room_id1],
)
# `limited` is omitted for `invite` rooms with `stripped_state` (no timeline anyway)
self.assertIsNone(
response_body["rooms"][room_id1].get("limited"),
response_body["rooms"][room_id1],
)
# `prev_batch` is omitted for `invite` rooms with `stripped_state` (no timeline anyway)
self.assertIsNone(
response_body["rooms"][room_id1].get("prev_batch"),
response_body["rooms"][room_id1],
)
# `required_state` is omitted for `invite` rooms with `stripped_state`
self.assertIsNone(
response_body["rooms"][room_id1].get("required_state"),
response_body["rooms"][room_id1],
)
# We should have some `stripped_state` so the potential joiner can identify the
# room (we don't care about the order).
self.assertCountEqual(
response_body["rooms"][room_id1]["invite_state"],
[
{
"content": {"creator": user2_id, "room_version": "10"},
"sender": user2_id,
"state_key": "",
"type": "m.room.create",
},
{
"content": {"join_rule": "public"},
"sender": user2_id,
"state_key": "",
"type": "m.room.join_rules",
},
{
"content": {"displayname": user2.localpart, "membership": "join"},
"sender": user2_id,
"state_key": user2_id,
"type": "m.room.member",
},
{
"content": {"displayname": user1.localpart, "membership": "invite"},
"sender": user2_id,
"state_key": user1_id,
"type": "m.room.member",
},
],
response_body["rooms"][room_id1]["invite_state"],
)
def test_rooms_invite_world_readable_history_initial_sync(self) -> None:
"""
Test that `rooms` we are invited to have some stripped `invite_state` during an
initial sync.
This is an `invite` room so we should only have `stripped_state` (no `timeline`)
but depending on the semantics we decide, we could potentially see some
historical events before/after the `from_token` because the history is
`world_readable`. Same situation for events after the `from_token` if the
history visibility was set to `invited`.
"""
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
user1 = UserID.from_string(user1_id)
user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
user2 = UserID.from_string(user2_id)
room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(
user2_id,
tok=user2_tok,
extra_content={
"preset": "public_chat",
"initial_state": [
{
"content": {
"history_visibility": HistoryVisibility.WORLD_READABLE
},
"state_key": "",
"type": EventTypes.RoomHistoryVisibility,
}
],
},
)
# Ensure we're testing with a room with `world_readable` history visibility
# which means events are visible to anyone even without membership.
history_visibility_response = self.helper.get_state(
room_id1, EventTypes.RoomHistoryVisibility, tok=user2_tok
)
self.assertEqual(
history_visibility_response.get("history_visibility"),
HistoryVisibility.WORLD_READABLE,
)
self.helper.send(room_id1, "activity before1", tok=user2_tok)
self.helper.send(room_id1, "activity before2", tok=user2_tok)
self.helper.invite(room_id1, src=user2_id, targ=user1_id, tok=user2_tok)
self.helper.send(room_id1, "activity after3", tok=user2_tok)
self.helper.send(room_id1, "activity after4", tok=user2_tok)
# Make the Sliding Sync request
sync_body = {
"lists": {
"foo-list": {
"ranges": [[0, 1]],
"required_state": [],
# Large enough to see the latest events and before the invite
"timeline_limit": 4,
}
}
}
response_body, _ = self.do_sync(sync_body, tok=user1_tok)
# `timeline` is omitted for `invite` rooms with `stripped_state`
self.assertIsNone(
response_body["rooms"][room_id1].get("timeline"),
response_body["rooms"][room_id1],
)
# `num_live` is omitted for `invite` rooms with `stripped_state` (no timeline anyway)
self.assertIsNone(
response_body["rooms"][room_id1].get("num_live"),
response_body["rooms"][room_id1],
)
# `limited` is omitted for `invite` rooms with `stripped_state` (no timeline anyway)
self.assertIsNone(
response_body["rooms"][room_id1].get("limited"),
response_body["rooms"][room_id1],
)
# `prev_batch` is omitted for `invite` rooms with `stripped_state` (no timeline anyway)
self.assertIsNone(
response_body["rooms"][room_id1].get("prev_batch"),
response_body["rooms"][room_id1],
)
# `required_state` is omitted for `invite` rooms with `stripped_state`
self.assertIsNone(
response_body["rooms"][room_id1].get("required_state"),
response_body["rooms"][room_id1],
)
# We should have some `stripped_state` so the potential joiner can identify the
# room (we don't care about the order).
self.assertCountEqual(
response_body["rooms"][room_id1]["invite_state"],
[
{
"content": {"creator": user2_id, "room_version": "10"},
"sender": user2_id,
"state_key": "",
"type": "m.room.create",
},
{
"content": {"join_rule": "public"},
"sender": user2_id,
"state_key": "",
"type": "m.room.join_rules",
},
{
"content": {"displayname": user2.localpart, "membership": "join"},
"sender": user2_id,
"state_key": user2_id,
"type": "m.room.member",
},
{
"content": {"displayname": user1.localpart, "membership": "invite"},
"sender": user2_id,
"state_key": user1_id,
"type": "m.room.member",
},
],
response_body["rooms"][room_id1]["invite_state"],
)
def test_rooms_invite_world_readable_history_incremental_sync(self) -> None:
"""
Test that `rooms` we are invited to have some stripped `invite_state` during an
incremental sync.
This is an `invite` room so we should only have `stripped_state` (no `timeline`)
but depending on the semantics we decide, we could potentially see some
historical events before/after the `from_token` because the history is
`world_readable`. Same situation for events after the `from_token` if the
history visibility was set to `invited`.
"""
user1_id = self.register_user("user1", "pass")
user1_tok = self.login(user1_id, "pass")
user1 = UserID.from_string(user1_id)
user2_id = self.register_user("user2", "pass")
user2_tok = self.login(user2_id, "pass")
user2 = UserID.from_string(user2_id)
room_id1 = self.helper.create_room_as(
user2_id,
tok=user2_tok,
extra_content={
"preset": "public_chat",
"initial_state": [
{
"content": {
"history_visibility": HistoryVisibility.WORLD_READABLE
},
"state_key": "",
"type": EventTypes.RoomHistoryVisibility,
}
],
},
)
# Ensure we're testing with a room with `world_readable` history visibility
# which means events are visible to anyone even without membership.
history_visibility_response = self.helper.get_state(
room_id1, EventTypes.RoomHistoryVisibility, tok=user2_tok
)
self.assertEqual(
history_visibility_response.get("history_visibility"),
HistoryVisibility.WORLD_READABLE,
)
self.helper.send(room_id1, "activity before invite1", tok=user2_tok)
self.helper.send(room_id1, "activity before invite2", tok=user2_tok)
self.helper.invite(room_id1, src=user2_id, targ=user1_id, tok=user2_tok)
self.helper.send(room_id1, "activity after invite3", tok=user2_tok)
self.helper.send(room_id1, "activity after invite4", tok=user2_tok)
sync_body = {
"lists": {
"foo-list": {
"ranges": [[0, 1]],
"required_state": [],
# Large enough to see the latest events and before the invite
"timeline_limit": 4,
}
}
}
_, from_token = self.do_sync(sync_body, tok=user1_tok)
self.helper.send(room_id1, "activity after token5", tok=user2_tok)
self.helper.send(room_id1, "activity after toekn6", tok=user2_tok)
# Make the incremental Sliding Sync request
response_body, _ = self.do_sync(sync_body, since=from_token, tok=user1_tok)
# `timeline` is omitted for `invite` rooms with `stripped_state`
self.assertIsNone(
response_body["rooms"][room_id1].get("timeline"),
response_body["rooms"][room_id1],
)
# `num_live` is omitted for `invite` rooms with `stripped_state` (no timeline anyway)
self.assertIsNone(
response_body["rooms"][room_id1].get("num_live"),
response_body["rooms"][room_id1],
)
# `limited` is omitted for `invite` rooms with `stripped_state` (no timeline anyway)
self.assertIsNone(
response_body["rooms"][room_id1].get("limited"),
response_body["rooms"][room_id1],
)
# `prev_batch` is omitted for `invite` rooms with `stripped_state` (no timeline anyway)
self.assertIsNone(
response_body["rooms"][room_id1].get("prev_batch"),
response_body["rooms"][room_id1],
)
# `required_state` is omitted for `invite` rooms with `stripped_state`
self.assertIsNone(
response_body["rooms"][room_id1].get("required_state"),
response_body["rooms"][room_id1],
)
# We should have some `stripped_state` so the potential joiner can identify the
# room (we don't care about the order).
self.assertCountEqual(
response_body["rooms"][room_id1]["invite_state"],
[
{
"content": {"creator": user2_id, "room_version": "10"},
"sender": user2_id,
"state_key": "",
"type": "m.room.create",
},
{
"content": {"join_rule": "public"},
"sender": user2_id,
"state_key": "",
"type": "m.room.join_rules",
},
{
"content": {"displayname": user2.localpart, "membership": "join"},
"sender": user2_id,
"state_key": user2_id,
"type": "m.room.member",
},
{
"content": {"displayname": user1.localpart, "membership": "invite"},
"sender": user2_id,
"state_key": user1_id,
"type": "m.room.member",
},
],
response_body["rooms"][room_id1]["invite_state"],
)