obs-studio/obs/window-basic-main.cpp

1010 lines
25 KiB
C++
Raw Normal View History

/******************************************************************************
Copyright (C) 2013-2014 by Hugh Bailey <obs.jim@gmail.com>
Copyright (C) 2014 by Zachary Lund <admin@computerquip.com>
This program is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify
it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
the Free Software Foundation, either version 2 of the License, or
(at your option) any later version.
This program is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
GNU General Public License for more details.
You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
along with this program. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
******************************************************************************/
2013-12-23 00:42:02 +00:00
#include <obs.hpp>
Change the UI to Qt (work in progress) -------------------------------------------------- Notes and details -------------------------------------------------- Why was this done? Because wxWidgets was just lacking in many areas. I know wxWidgets is designed to be used with native controls, and that's great, but wxWidgets just is not a feature-complete toolkit for multiplatform applications. It lacks in dialog editors, its code is archaic and outdated, and I just feel frustrated every time I try to do things with it. Qt on the other hand.. I had to actually try Qt to realize how much better it was as a toolkit. They've got everything from dialog editors, to an IDE, a debugger, build tools, just everything, and it's all top-notch and highly maintained. The focus of the toolkit is application development, and they spend their time trying to help people do exactly that: make programs. Great support, great tools, and because of that, great toolkit. I just didn't want to alienate any developers by being stubborn about native widgets. There *are* some things that are rather lackluster about it and design choices I disagree with though. For example, I realize that to have an easy to use toolkit you have to have some level of code generation. However, in my personal and humble opinion, moc just feels like a terrible way to approach the problem. Even now I feel like there are a variety of ways you could handle code generation and automatic management of things like that. I don't like the idea of circumventing the language itself like that. It feels like one giant massive hack. -------------------------------------------------- Things that aren't working properly: -------------------------------------------------- - Settings dialog is not implemented. The dialog is complete but the code to handle the dialog hasn't been constructed yet. - There is a problem with using Qt widgets as a device target on windows, with at least OpenGL: if I have the preview widget automatically resize itself, it seems to cause some sort of video card failure that I don't understand. - Because of the above, resizing the preview widget has been disabled until I can figure out what's going on, so it's currently only a 32x32 area. - Direct3D doesn't seem to render correctly either, seems that the viewport is messed up or something. I'm sort of confused about what's going on with it. - The new main window seems to be triggering more race conditions than the wxWidgets main window dialog did. I'm not entirely sure what's going on here, but this may just be existing race conditions within libobs itself that I just never spotted before (even though I tend to be very thorough with race conditions any time I use variables cross-thread)
2014-01-23 18:53:55 +00:00
#include <QMessageBox>
#include <QShowEvent>
#include <QFileDialog>
#include <util/util.hpp>
#include <util/platform.h>
#include "obs-app.hpp"
#include "platform.hpp"
#include "window-basic-settings.hpp"
#include "window-namedialog.hpp"
Change the UI to Qt (work in progress) -------------------------------------------------- Notes and details -------------------------------------------------- Why was this done? Because wxWidgets was just lacking in many areas. I know wxWidgets is designed to be used with native controls, and that's great, but wxWidgets just is not a feature-complete toolkit for multiplatform applications. It lacks in dialog editors, its code is archaic and outdated, and I just feel frustrated every time I try to do things with it. Qt on the other hand.. I had to actually try Qt to realize how much better it was as a toolkit. They've got everything from dialog editors, to an IDE, a debugger, build tools, just everything, and it's all top-notch and highly maintained. The focus of the toolkit is application development, and they spend their time trying to help people do exactly that: make programs. Great support, great tools, and because of that, great toolkit. I just didn't want to alienate any developers by being stubborn about native widgets. There *are* some things that are rather lackluster about it and design choices I disagree with though. For example, I realize that to have an easy to use toolkit you have to have some level of code generation. However, in my personal and humble opinion, moc just feels like a terrible way to approach the problem. Even now I feel like there are a variety of ways you could handle code generation and automatic management of things like that. I don't like the idea of circumventing the language itself like that. It feels like one giant massive hack. -------------------------------------------------- Things that aren't working properly: -------------------------------------------------- - Settings dialog is not implemented. The dialog is complete but the code to handle the dialog hasn't been constructed yet. - There is a problem with using Qt widgets as a device target on windows, with at least OpenGL: if I have the preview widget automatically resize itself, it seems to cause some sort of video card failure that I don't understand. - Because of the above, resizing the preview widget has been disabled until I can figure out what's going on, so it's currently only a 32x32 area. - Direct3D doesn't seem to render correctly either, seems that the viewport is messed up or something. I'm sort of confused about what's going on with it. - The new main window seems to be triggering more race conditions than the wxWidgets main window dialog did. I'm not entirely sure what's going on here, but this may just be existing race conditions within libobs itself that I just never spotted before (even though I tend to be very thorough with race conditions any time I use variables cross-thread)
2014-01-23 18:53:55 +00:00
#include "window-basic-main.hpp"
Add source properties window (very preliminary) - Add a properties window for sources so that you can now actually edit the settings for sources. Also, display the source by itself in the window (Note: not working on mac, and possibly not working on linux). When changing the settings for a source, it will call obs_source_update on that source when you have modified any values automatically. - Add a properties 'widget', eventually I want to turn this in to a regular nice properties view like you'd see in the designer, but right now it just uses a form layout in a QScrollArea with regular controls to display the properties. It's clunky but works for the time being. - Make it so that swap chains and the main graphics subsystem will automatically use at least one backbuffer if none was specified - Fix bug where displays weren't added to the main display array - Make it so that you can get the properties of a source via the actual pointer of a source/encoder/output in addition to being able to look up properties via identifier. - When registering source types, check for required functions (wasn't doing it before). getheight/getwidth should not be optional if it's a video source as well. - Add an RAII OBSObj wrapper to obs.hpp for non-reference-counted libobs pointers - Add an RAII OBSSignal wrapper to obs.hpp for libobs signals to automatically disconnect them on destruction - Move the "scale and center" calculation in window-basic-main.cpp to its own function and in its own source file - Add an 'update' callback to WASAPI audio sources
2014-03-23 08:07:54 +00:00
#include "window-basic-properties.hpp"
Change the UI to Qt (work in progress) -------------------------------------------------- Notes and details -------------------------------------------------- Why was this done? Because wxWidgets was just lacking in many areas. I know wxWidgets is designed to be used with native controls, and that's great, but wxWidgets just is not a feature-complete toolkit for multiplatform applications. It lacks in dialog editors, its code is archaic and outdated, and I just feel frustrated every time I try to do things with it. Qt on the other hand.. I had to actually try Qt to realize how much better it was as a toolkit. They've got everything from dialog editors, to an IDE, a debugger, build tools, just everything, and it's all top-notch and highly maintained. The focus of the toolkit is application development, and they spend their time trying to help people do exactly that: make programs. Great support, great tools, and because of that, great toolkit. I just didn't want to alienate any developers by being stubborn about native widgets. There *are* some things that are rather lackluster about it and design choices I disagree with though. For example, I realize that to have an easy to use toolkit you have to have some level of code generation. However, in my personal and humble opinion, moc just feels like a terrible way to approach the problem. Even now I feel like there are a variety of ways you could handle code generation and automatic management of things like that. I don't like the idea of circumventing the language itself like that. It feels like one giant massive hack. -------------------------------------------------- Things that aren't working properly: -------------------------------------------------- - Settings dialog is not implemented. The dialog is complete but the code to handle the dialog hasn't been constructed yet. - There is a problem with using Qt widgets as a device target on windows, with at least OpenGL: if I have the preview widget automatically resize itself, it seems to cause some sort of video card failure that I don't understand. - Because of the above, resizing the preview widget has been disabled until I can figure out what's going on, so it's currently only a 32x32 area. - Direct3D doesn't seem to render correctly either, seems that the viewport is messed up or something. I'm sort of confused about what's going on with it. - The new main window seems to be triggering more race conditions than the wxWidgets main window dialog did. I'm not entirely sure what's going on here, but this may just be existing race conditions within libobs itself that I just never spotted before (even though I tend to be very thorough with race conditions any time I use variables cross-thread)
2014-01-23 18:53:55 +00:00
#include "qt-wrappers.hpp"
Add source properties window (very preliminary) - Add a properties window for sources so that you can now actually edit the settings for sources. Also, display the source by itself in the window (Note: not working on mac, and possibly not working on linux). When changing the settings for a source, it will call obs_source_update on that source when you have modified any values automatically. - Add a properties 'widget', eventually I want to turn this in to a regular nice properties view like you'd see in the designer, but right now it just uses a form layout in a QScrollArea with regular controls to display the properties. It's clunky but works for the time being. - Make it so that swap chains and the main graphics subsystem will automatically use at least one backbuffer if none was specified - Fix bug where displays weren't added to the main display array - Make it so that you can get the properties of a source via the actual pointer of a source/encoder/output in addition to being able to look up properties via identifier. - When registering source types, check for required functions (wasn't doing it before). getheight/getwidth should not be optional if it's a video source as well. - Add an RAII OBSObj wrapper to obs.hpp for non-reference-counted libobs pointers - Add an RAII OBSSignal wrapper to obs.hpp for libobs signals to automatically disconnect them on destruction - Move the "scale and center" calculation in window-basic-main.cpp to its own function and in its own source file - Add an 'update' callback to WASAPI audio sources
2014-03-23 08:07:54 +00:00
#include "display-helpers.hpp"
Change the UI to Qt (work in progress) -------------------------------------------------- Notes and details -------------------------------------------------- Why was this done? Because wxWidgets was just lacking in many areas. I know wxWidgets is designed to be used with native controls, and that's great, but wxWidgets just is not a feature-complete toolkit for multiplatform applications. It lacks in dialog editors, its code is archaic and outdated, and I just feel frustrated every time I try to do things with it. Qt on the other hand.. I had to actually try Qt to realize how much better it was as a toolkit. They've got everything from dialog editors, to an IDE, a debugger, build tools, just everything, and it's all top-notch and highly maintained. The focus of the toolkit is application development, and they spend their time trying to help people do exactly that: make programs. Great support, great tools, and because of that, great toolkit. I just didn't want to alienate any developers by being stubborn about native widgets. There *are* some things that are rather lackluster about it and design choices I disagree with though. For example, I realize that to have an easy to use toolkit you have to have some level of code generation. However, in my personal and humble opinion, moc just feels like a terrible way to approach the problem. Even now I feel like there are a variety of ways you could handle code generation and automatic management of things like that. I don't like the idea of circumventing the language itself like that. It feels like one giant massive hack. -------------------------------------------------- Things that aren't working properly: -------------------------------------------------- - Settings dialog is not implemented. The dialog is complete but the code to handle the dialog hasn't been constructed yet. - There is a problem with using Qt widgets as a device target on windows, with at least OpenGL: if I have the preview widget automatically resize itself, it seems to cause some sort of video card failure that I don't understand. - Because of the above, resizing the preview widget has been disabled until I can figure out what's going on, so it's currently only a 32x32 area. - Direct3D doesn't seem to render correctly either, seems that the viewport is messed up or something. I'm sort of confused about what's going on with it. - The new main window seems to be triggering more race conditions than the wxWidgets main window dialog did. I'm not entirely sure what's going on here, but this may just be existing race conditions within libobs itself that I just never spotted before (even though I tend to be very thorough with race conditions any time I use variables cross-thread)
2014-01-23 18:53:55 +00:00
#include "ui_OBSBasic.h"
Implement RTMP module (still needs drop code) - Implement the RTMP output module. This time around, we just use a simple FLV muxer, then just write to the stream with RTMP_Write. Easy and effective. - Fix the FLV muxer, the muxer now outputs proper FLV packets. - Output API: * When using encoders, automatically interleave encoded packets before sending it to the output. * Pair encoders and have them automatically wait for the other to start to ensure sync. * Change 'obs_output_signal_start_fail' to 'obs_output_signal_stop' because it was a bit confusing, and doing this makes a lot more sense for outputs that need to stop suddenly (disconnections/etc). - Encoder API: * Remove some unnecessary encoder functions from the actual API and make them internal. Most of the encoder functions are handled automatically by outputs anyway, so there's no real need to expose them and end up inadvertently confusing plugin writers. * Have audio encoders wait for the video encoder to get a frame, then start at the exact data point that the first video frame starts to ensure the most accrate sync of video/audio possible. * Add a required 'frame_size' callback for audio encoders that returns the expected number of frames desired to encode with. This way, the libobs encoder API can handle the circular buffering internally automatically for the encoder modules, so encoder writers don't have to do it themselves. - Fix a few bugs in the serializer interface. It was passing the wrong variable for the data in a few cases. - If a source has video, make obs_source_update defer the actual update callback until the tick function is called to prevent threading issues.
2014-04-08 05:00:10 +00:00
#include <sstream>
#include <QScreen>
#include <QWindow>
using namespace std;
2013-11-22 23:20:52 +00:00
Q_DECLARE_METATYPE(OBSScene);
Q_DECLARE_METATYPE(OBSSceneItem);
OBSBasic::OBSBasic(QWidget *parent)
: OBSMainWindow (parent),
Implement RTMP module (still needs drop code) - Implement the RTMP output module. This time around, we just use a simple FLV muxer, then just write to the stream with RTMP_Write. Easy and effective. - Fix the FLV muxer, the muxer now outputs proper FLV packets. - Output API: * When using encoders, automatically interleave encoded packets before sending it to the output. * Pair encoders and have them automatically wait for the other to start to ensure sync. * Change 'obs_output_signal_start_fail' to 'obs_output_signal_stop' because it was a bit confusing, and doing this makes a lot more sense for outputs that need to stop suddenly (disconnections/etc). - Encoder API: * Remove some unnecessary encoder functions from the actual API and make them internal. Most of the encoder functions are handled automatically by outputs anyway, so there's no real need to expose them and end up inadvertently confusing plugin writers. * Have audio encoders wait for the video encoder to get a frame, then start at the exact data point that the first video frame starts to ensure the most accrate sync of video/audio possible. * Add a required 'frame_size' callback for audio encoders that returns the expected number of frames desired to encode with. This way, the libobs encoder API can handle the circular buffering internally automatically for the encoder modules, so encoder writers don't have to do it themselves. - Fix a few bugs in the serializer interface. It was passing the wrong variable for the data in a few cases. - If a source has video, make obs_source_update defer the actual update callback until the tick function is called to prevent threading issues.
2014-04-08 05:00:10 +00:00
outputTest (nullptr),
aac (nullptr),
x264 (nullptr),
sceneChanging (false),
resizeTimer (0),
Add source properties window (very preliminary) - Add a properties window for sources so that you can now actually edit the settings for sources. Also, display the source by itself in the window (Note: not working on mac, and possibly not working on linux). When changing the settings for a source, it will call obs_source_update on that source when you have modified any values automatically. - Add a properties 'widget', eventually I want to turn this in to a regular nice properties view like you'd see in the designer, but right now it just uses a form layout in a QScrollArea with regular controls to display the properties. It's clunky but works for the time being. - Make it so that swap chains and the main graphics subsystem will automatically use at least one backbuffer if none was specified - Fix bug where displays weren't added to the main display array - Make it so that you can get the properties of a source via the actual pointer of a source/encoder/output in addition to being able to look up properties via identifier. - When registering source types, check for required functions (wasn't doing it before). getheight/getwidth should not be optional if it's a video source as well. - Add an RAII OBSObj wrapper to obs.hpp for non-reference-counted libobs pointers - Add an RAII OBSSignal wrapper to obs.hpp for libobs signals to automatically disconnect them on destruction - Move the "scale and center" calculation in window-basic-main.cpp to its own function and in its own source file - Add an 'update' callback to WASAPI audio sources
2014-03-23 08:07:54 +00:00
properties (nullptr),
ui (new Ui::OBSBasic)
{
ui->setupUi(this);
connect(windowHandle(), &QWindow::screenChanged, [this]() {
struct obs_video_info ovi;
if (obs_get_video_info(&ovi))
ResizePreview(ovi.base_width, ovi.base_height);
});
}
static inline bool HasAudioDevices(const char *source_id)
{
const char *output_id = source_id;
Add source properties window (very preliminary) - Add a properties window for sources so that you can now actually edit the settings for sources. Also, display the source by itself in the window (Note: not working on mac, and possibly not working on linux). When changing the settings for a source, it will call obs_source_update on that source when you have modified any values automatically. - Add a properties 'widget', eventually I want to turn this in to a regular nice properties view like you'd see in the designer, but right now it just uses a form layout in a QScrollArea with regular controls to display the properties. It's clunky but works for the time being. - Make it so that swap chains and the main graphics subsystem will automatically use at least one backbuffer if none was specified - Fix bug where displays weren't added to the main display array - Make it so that you can get the properties of a source via the actual pointer of a source/encoder/output in addition to being able to look up properties via identifier. - When registering source types, check for required functions (wasn't doing it before). getheight/getwidth should not be optional if it's a video source as well. - Add an RAII OBSObj wrapper to obs.hpp for non-reference-counted libobs pointers - Add an RAII OBSSignal wrapper to obs.hpp for libobs signals to automatically disconnect them on destruction - Move the "scale and center" calculation in window-basic-main.cpp to its own function and in its own source file - Add an 'update' callback to WASAPI audio sources
2014-03-23 08:07:54 +00:00
obs_properties_t props = obs_get_source_properties(
OBS_SOURCE_TYPE_INPUT, output_id, App()->GetLocale());
size_t count = 0;
if (!props)
return false;
obs_property_t devices = obs_properties_get(props, "device_id");
if (devices)
count = obs_property_list_item_count(devices);
obs_properties_destroy(props);
return count != 0;
}
bool OBSBasic::InitBasicConfigDefaults()
{
bool hasDesktopAudio = HasAudioDevices(App()->OutputAudioSource());
bool hasInputAudio = HasAudioDevices(App()->InputAudioSource());
config_set_default_int(basicConfig, "Window", "PosX", -1);
config_set_default_int(basicConfig, "Window", "PosY", -1);
config_set_default_int(basicConfig, "Window", "SizeX", -1);
config_set_default_int(basicConfig, "Window", "SizeY", -1);
vector<MonitorInfo> monitors;
GetMonitors(monitors);
if (!monitors.size()) {
OBSErrorBox(NULL, "There appears to be no monitors. Er, this "
"technically shouldn't be possible.");
return false;
}
uint32_t cx = monitors[0].cx;
uint32_t cy = monitors[0].cy;
/* TODO: temporary */
config_set_default_string(basicConfig, "OutputTemp", "URL", "");
config_set_default_string(basicConfig, "OutputTemp", "Key", "");
config_set_default_uint (basicConfig, "OutputTemp", "VBitrate", 2500);
config_set_default_uint (basicConfig, "OutputTemp", "ABitrate", 128);
config_set_default_uint (basicConfig, "Video", "BaseCX", cx);
config_set_default_uint (basicConfig, "Video", "BaseCY", cy);
cx = cx * 10 / 15;
cy = cy * 10 / 15;
config_set_default_uint (basicConfig, "Video", "OutputCX", cx);
config_set_default_uint (basicConfig, "Video", "OutputCY", cy);
config_set_default_uint (basicConfig, "Video", "FPSType", 0);
config_set_default_string(basicConfig, "Video", "FPSCommon", "30");
config_set_default_uint (basicConfig, "Video", "FPSInt", 30);
config_set_default_uint (basicConfig, "Video", "FPSNum", 30);
config_set_default_uint (basicConfig, "Video", "FPSDen", 1);
config_set_default_uint (basicConfig, "Audio", "SampleRate", 44100);
config_set_default_string(basicConfig, "Audio", "ChannelSetup",
"Stereo");
config_set_default_uint (basicConfig, "Audio", "BufferingTime", 1000);
config_set_default_string(basicConfig, "Audio", "DesktopDevice1",
hasDesktopAudio ? "default" : "disabled");
config_set_default_string(basicConfig, "Audio", "DesktopDevice2",
"disabled");
config_set_default_string(basicConfig, "Audio", "AuxDevice1",
hasInputAudio ? "default" : "disabled");
config_set_default_string(basicConfig, "Audio", "AuxDevice2",
"disabled");
config_set_default_string(basicConfig, "Audio", "AuxDevice3",
"disabled");
return true;
}
bool OBSBasic::InitBasicConfig()
{
BPtr<char> configPath(os_get_config_path("obs-studio/basic/basic.ini"));
int errorcode = basicConfig.Open(configPath, CONFIG_OPEN_ALWAYS);
if (errorcode != CONFIG_SUCCESS) {
OBSErrorBox(NULL, "Failed to open basic.ini: %d", errorcode);
return false;
}
return InitBasicConfigDefaults();
}
void OBSBasic::OBSInit()
{
/* make sure it's fully displayed before doing any initialization */
show();
App()->processEvents();
if (!obs_startup())
throw "Failed to initialize libobs";
if (!InitBasicConfig())
throw "Failed to load basic.ini";
if (!ResetVideo())
throw "Failed to initialize video";
if (!ResetAudio())
throw "Failed to initialize audio";
signal_handler_connect(obs_signalhandler(), "source_add",
OBSBasic::SourceAdded, this);
signal_handler_connect(obs_signalhandler(), "source_remove",
OBSBasic::SourceRemoved, this);
signal_handler_connect(obs_signalhandler(), "channel_change",
OBSBasic::ChannelChanged, this);
/* TODO: this is a test, all modules will be searched for and loaded
* automatically later */
obs_load_module("test-input");
obs_load_module("obs-ffmpeg");
Implement RTMP module (still needs drop code) - Implement the RTMP output module. This time around, we just use a simple FLV muxer, then just write to the stream with RTMP_Write. Easy and effective. - Fix the FLV muxer, the muxer now outputs proper FLV packets. - Output API: * When using encoders, automatically interleave encoded packets before sending it to the output. * Pair encoders and have them automatically wait for the other to start to ensure sync. * Change 'obs_output_signal_start_fail' to 'obs_output_signal_stop' because it was a bit confusing, and doing this makes a lot more sense for outputs that need to stop suddenly (disconnections/etc). - Encoder API: * Remove some unnecessary encoder functions from the actual API and make them internal. Most of the encoder functions are handled automatically by outputs anyway, so there's no real need to expose them and end up inadvertently confusing plugin writers. * Have audio encoders wait for the video encoder to get a frame, then start at the exact data point that the first video frame starts to ensure the most accrate sync of video/audio possible. * Add a required 'frame_size' callback for audio encoders that returns the expected number of frames desired to encode with. This way, the libobs encoder API can handle the circular buffering internally automatically for the encoder modules, so encoder writers don't have to do it themselves. - Fix a few bugs in the serializer interface. It was passing the wrong variable for the data in a few cases. - If a source has video, make obs_source_update defer the actual update callback until the tick function is called to prevent threading issues.
2014-04-08 05:00:10 +00:00
obs_load_module("obs-x264");
obs_load_module("obs-outputs");
#ifdef __APPLE__
obs_load_module("mac-capture");
#elif _WIN32
obs_load_module("win-wasapi");
obs_load_module("win-capture");
#else
obs_load_module("linux-xshm");
obs_load_module("linux-pulseaudio");
#endif
ResetAudioDevices();
}
OBSBasic::~OBSBasic()
{
Add source properties window (very preliminary) - Add a properties window for sources so that you can now actually edit the settings for sources. Also, display the source by itself in the window (Note: not working on mac, and possibly not working on linux). When changing the settings for a source, it will call obs_source_update on that source when you have modified any values automatically. - Add a properties 'widget', eventually I want to turn this in to a regular nice properties view like you'd see in the designer, but right now it just uses a form layout in a QScrollArea with regular controls to display the properties. It's clunky but works for the time being. - Make it so that swap chains and the main graphics subsystem will automatically use at least one backbuffer if none was specified - Fix bug where displays weren't added to the main display array - Make it so that you can get the properties of a source via the actual pointer of a source/encoder/output in addition to being able to look up properties via identifier. - When registering source types, check for required functions (wasn't doing it before). getheight/getwidth should not be optional if it's a video source as well. - Add an RAII OBSObj wrapper to obs.hpp for non-reference-counted libobs pointers - Add an RAII OBSSignal wrapper to obs.hpp for libobs signals to automatically disconnect them on destruction - Move the "scale and center" calculation in window-basic-main.cpp to its own function and in its own source file - Add an 'update' callback to WASAPI audio sources
2014-03-23 08:07:54 +00:00
if (properties)
delete properties;
/* free the lists before shutting down to remove the scene/item
* references */
ui->sources->clear();
ui->scenes->clear();
obs_shutdown();
}
OBSScene OBSBasic::GetCurrentScene()
{
Change the UI to Qt (work in progress) -------------------------------------------------- Notes and details -------------------------------------------------- Why was this done? Because wxWidgets was just lacking in many areas. I know wxWidgets is designed to be used with native controls, and that's great, but wxWidgets just is not a feature-complete toolkit for multiplatform applications. It lacks in dialog editors, its code is archaic and outdated, and I just feel frustrated every time I try to do things with it. Qt on the other hand.. I had to actually try Qt to realize how much better it was as a toolkit. They've got everything from dialog editors, to an IDE, a debugger, build tools, just everything, and it's all top-notch and highly maintained. The focus of the toolkit is application development, and they spend their time trying to help people do exactly that: make programs. Great support, great tools, and because of that, great toolkit. I just didn't want to alienate any developers by being stubborn about native widgets. There *are* some things that are rather lackluster about it and design choices I disagree with though. For example, I realize that to have an easy to use toolkit you have to have some level of code generation. However, in my personal and humble opinion, moc just feels like a terrible way to approach the problem. Even now I feel like there are a variety of ways you could handle code generation and automatic management of things like that. I don't like the idea of circumventing the language itself like that. It feels like one giant massive hack. -------------------------------------------------- Things that aren't working properly: -------------------------------------------------- - Settings dialog is not implemented. The dialog is complete but the code to handle the dialog hasn't been constructed yet. - There is a problem with using Qt widgets as a device target on windows, with at least OpenGL: if I have the preview widget automatically resize itself, it seems to cause some sort of video card failure that I don't understand. - Because of the above, resizing the preview widget has been disabled until I can figure out what's going on, so it's currently only a 32x32 area. - Direct3D doesn't seem to render correctly either, seems that the viewport is messed up or something. I'm sort of confused about what's going on with it. - The new main window seems to be triggering more race conditions than the wxWidgets main window dialog did. I'm not entirely sure what's going on here, but this may just be existing race conditions within libobs itself that I just never spotted before (even though I tend to be very thorough with race conditions any time I use variables cross-thread)
2014-01-23 18:53:55 +00:00
QListWidgetItem *item = ui->scenes->currentItem();
return item ? item->data(Qt::UserRole).value<OBSScene>() : nullptr;
}
OBSSceneItem OBSBasic::GetCurrentSceneItem()
{
QListWidgetItem *item = ui->sources->currentItem();
return item ? item->data(Qt::UserRole).value<OBSSceneItem>() : nullptr;
}
void OBSBasic::UpdateSources(OBSScene scene)
{
ui->sources->clear();
obs_scene_enum_items(scene,
[] (obs_scene_t scene, obs_sceneitem_t item, void *p)
{
OBSBasic *window = static_cast<OBSBasic*>(p);
window->InsertSceneItem(item);
UNUSED_PARAMETER(scene);
return true;
}, this);
}
void OBSBasic::InsertSceneItem(obs_sceneitem_t item)
{
obs_source_t source = obs_sceneitem_getsource(item);
const char *name = obs_source_getname(source);
QListWidgetItem *listItem = new QListWidgetItem(QT_UTF8(name));
listItem->setData(Qt::UserRole,
QVariant::fromValue(OBSSceneItem(item)));
ui->sources->insertItem(0, listItem);
}
/* Qt callbacks for invokeMethod */
void OBSBasic::AddScene(OBSSource source)
{
const char *name = obs_source_getname(source);
obs_scene_t scene = obs_scene_fromsource(source);
Change the UI to Qt (work in progress) -------------------------------------------------- Notes and details -------------------------------------------------- Why was this done? Because wxWidgets was just lacking in many areas. I know wxWidgets is designed to be used with native controls, and that's great, but wxWidgets just is not a feature-complete toolkit for multiplatform applications. It lacks in dialog editors, its code is archaic and outdated, and I just feel frustrated every time I try to do things with it. Qt on the other hand.. I had to actually try Qt to realize how much better it was as a toolkit. They've got everything from dialog editors, to an IDE, a debugger, build tools, just everything, and it's all top-notch and highly maintained. The focus of the toolkit is application development, and they spend their time trying to help people do exactly that: make programs. Great support, great tools, and because of that, great toolkit. I just didn't want to alienate any developers by being stubborn about native widgets. There *are* some things that are rather lackluster about it and design choices I disagree with though. For example, I realize that to have an easy to use toolkit you have to have some level of code generation. However, in my personal and humble opinion, moc just feels like a terrible way to approach the problem. Even now I feel like there are a variety of ways you could handle code generation and automatic management of things like that. I don't like the idea of circumventing the language itself like that. It feels like one giant massive hack. -------------------------------------------------- Things that aren't working properly: -------------------------------------------------- - Settings dialog is not implemented. The dialog is complete but the code to handle the dialog hasn't been constructed yet. - There is a problem with using Qt widgets as a device target on windows, with at least OpenGL: if I have the preview widget automatically resize itself, it seems to cause some sort of video card failure that I don't understand. - Because of the above, resizing the preview widget has been disabled until I can figure out what's going on, so it's currently only a 32x32 area. - Direct3D doesn't seem to render correctly either, seems that the viewport is messed up or something. I'm sort of confused about what's going on with it. - The new main window seems to be triggering more race conditions than the wxWidgets main window dialog did. I'm not entirely sure what's going on here, but this may just be existing race conditions within libobs itself that I just never spotted before (even though I tend to be very thorough with race conditions any time I use variables cross-thread)
2014-01-23 18:53:55 +00:00
QListWidgetItem *item = new QListWidgetItem(QT_UTF8(name));
item->setData(Qt::UserRole, QVariant::fromValue(OBSScene(scene)));
Change the UI to Qt (work in progress) -------------------------------------------------- Notes and details -------------------------------------------------- Why was this done? Because wxWidgets was just lacking in many areas. I know wxWidgets is designed to be used with native controls, and that's great, but wxWidgets just is not a feature-complete toolkit for multiplatform applications. It lacks in dialog editors, its code is archaic and outdated, and I just feel frustrated every time I try to do things with it. Qt on the other hand.. I had to actually try Qt to realize how much better it was as a toolkit. They've got everything from dialog editors, to an IDE, a debugger, build tools, just everything, and it's all top-notch and highly maintained. The focus of the toolkit is application development, and they spend their time trying to help people do exactly that: make programs. Great support, great tools, and because of that, great toolkit. I just didn't want to alienate any developers by being stubborn about native widgets. There *are* some things that are rather lackluster about it and design choices I disagree with though. For example, I realize that to have an easy to use toolkit you have to have some level of code generation. However, in my personal and humble opinion, moc just feels like a terrible way to approach the problem. Even now I feel like there are a variety of ways you could handle code generation and automatic management of things like that. I don't like the idea of circumventing the language itself like that. It feels like one giant massive hack. -------------------------------------------------- Things that aren't working properly: -------------------------------------------------- - Settings dialog is not implemented. The dialog is complete but the code to handle the dialog hasn't been constructed yet. - There is a problem with using Qt widgets as a device target on windows, with at least OpenGL: if I have the preview widget automatically resize itself, it seems to cause some sort of video card failure that I don't understand. - Because of the above, resizing the preview widget has been disabled until I can figure out what's going on, so it's currently only a 32x32 area. - Direct3D doesn't seem to render correctly either, seems that the viewport is messed up or something. I'm sort of confused about what's going on with it. - The new main window seems to be triggering more race conditions than the wxWidgets main window dialog did. I'm not entirely sure what's going on here, but this may just be existing race conditions within libobs itself that I just never spotted before (even though I tend to be very thorough with race conditions any time I use variables cross-thread)
2014-01-23 18:53:55 +00:00
ui->scenes->addItem(item);
signal_handler_t handler = obs_source_signalhandler(source);
signal_handler_connect(handler, "item_add",
OBSBasic::SceneItemAdded, this);
signal_handler_connect(handler, "item_remove",
OBSBasic::SceneItemRemoved, this);
}
void OBSBasic::RemoveScene(OBSSource source)
2013-12-29 05:29:13 +00:00
{
const char *name = obs_source_getname(source);
Change the UI to Qt (work in progress) -------------------------------------------------- Notes and details -------------------------------------------------- Why was this done? Because wxWidgets was just lacking in many areas. I know wxWidgets is designed to be used with native controls, and that's great, but wxWidgets just is not a feature-complete toolkit for multiplatform applications. It lacks in dialog editors, its code is archaic and outdated, and I just feel frustrated every time I try to do things with it. Qt on the other hand.. I had to actually try Qt to realize how much better it was as a toolkit. They've got everything from dialog editors, to an IDE, a debugger, build tools, just everything, and it's all top-notch and highly maintained. The focus of the toolkit is application development, and they spend their time trying to help people do exactly that: make programs. Great support, great tools, and because of that, great toolkit. I just didn't want to alienate any developers by being stubborn about native widgets. There *are* some things that are rather lackluster about it and design choices I disagree with though. For example, I realize that to have an easy to use toolkit you have to have some level of code generation. However, in my personal and humble opinion, moc just feels like a terrible way to approach the problem. Even now I feel like there are a variety of ways you could handle code generation and automatic management of things like that. I don't like the idea of circumventing the language itself like that. It feels like one giant massive hack. -------------------------------------------------- Things that aren't working properly: -------------------------------------------------- - Settings dialog is not implemented. The dialog is complete but the code to handle the dialog hasn't been constructed yet. - There is a problem with using Qt widgets as a device target on windows, with at least OpenGL: if I have the preview widget automatically resize itself, it seems to cause some sort of video card failure that I don't understand. - Because of the above, resizing the preview widget has been disabled until I can figure out what's going on, so it's currently only a 32x32 area. - Direct3D doesn't seem to render correctly either, seems that the viewport is messed up or something. I'm sort of confused about what's going on with it. - The new main window seems to be triggering more race conditions than the wxWidgets main window dialog did. I'm not entirely sure what's going on here, but this may just be existing race conditions within libobs itself that I just never spotted before (even though I tend to be very thorough with race conditions any time I use variables cross-thread)
2014-01-23 18:53:55 +00:00
QListWidgetItem *sel = ui->scenes->currentItem();
QList<QListWidgetItem*> items = ui->scenes->findItems(QT_UTF8(name),
Qt::MatchExactly);
Change the UI to Qt (work in progress) -------------------------------------------------- Notes and details -------------------------------------------------- Why was this done? Because wxWidgets was just lacking in many areas. I know wxWidgets is designed to be used with native controls, and that's great, but wxWidgets just is not a feature-complete toolkit for multiplatform applications. It lacks in dialog editors, its code is archaic and outdated, and I just feel frustrated every time I try to do things with it. Qt on the other hand.. I had to actually try Qt to realize how much better it was as a toolkit. They've got everything from dialog editors, to an IDE, a debugger, build tools, just everything, and it's all top-notch and highly maintained. The focus of the toolkit is application development, and they spend their time trying to help people do exactly that: make programs. Great support, great tools, and because of that, great toolkit. I just didn't want to alienate any developers by being stubborn about native widgets. There *are* some things that are rather lackluster about it and design choices I disagree with though. For example, I realize that to have an easy to use toolkit you have to have some level of code generation. However, in my personal and humble opinion, moc just feels like a terrible way to approach the problem. Even now I feel like there are a variety of ways you could handle code generation and automatic management of things like that. I don't like the idea of circumventing the language itself like that. It feels like one giant massive hack. -------------------------------------------------- Things that aren't working properly: -------------------------------------------------- - Settings dialog is not implemented. The dialog is complete but the code to handle the dialog hasn't been constructed yet. - There is a problem with using Qt widgets as a device target on windows, with at least OpenGL: if I have the preview widget automatically resize itself, it seems to cause some sort of video card failure that I don't understand. - Because of the above, resizing the preview widget has been disabled until I can figure out what's going on, so it's currently only a 32x32 area. - Direct3D doesn't seem to render correctly either, seems that the viewport is messed up or something. I'm sort of confused about what's going on with it. - The new main window seems to be triggering more race conditions than the wxWidgets main window dialog did. I'm not entirely sure what's going on here, but this may just be existing race conditions within libobs itself that I just never spotted before (even though I tend to be very thorough with race conditions any time I use variables cross-thread)
2014-01-23 18:53:55 +00:00
if (sel != nullptr) {
if (items.contains(sel))
ui->sources->clear();
delete sel;
}
}
void OBSBasic::AddSceneItem(OBSSceneItem item)
{
obs_scene_t scene = obs_sceneitem_getscene(item);
obs_source_t source = obs_sceneitem_getsource(item);
if (GetCurrentScene() == scene)
InsertSceneItem(item);
sourceSceneRefs[source] = sourceSceneRefs[source] + 1;
}
void OBSBasic::RemoveSceneItem(OBSSceneItem item)
{
obs_scene_t scene = obs_sceneitem_getscene(item);
if (GetCurrentScene() == scene) {
for (int i = 0; i < ui->sources->count(); i++) {
Change the UI to Qt (work in progress) -------------------------------------------------- Notes and details -------------------------------------------------- Why was this done? Because wxWidgets was just lacking in many areas. I know wxWidgets is designed to be used with native controls, and that's great, but wxWidgets just is not a feature-complete toolkit for multiplatform applications. It lacks in dialog editors, its code is archaic and outdated, and I just feel frustrated every time I try to do things with it. Qt on the other hand.. I had to actually try Qt to realize how much better it was as a toolkit. They've got everything from dialog editors, to an IDE, a debugger, build tools, just everything, and it's all top-notch and highly maintained. The focus of the toolkit is application development, and they spend their time trying to help people do exactly that: make programs. Great support, great tools, and because of that, great toolkit. I just didn't want to alienate any developers by being stubborn about native widgets. There *are* some things that are rather lackluster about it and design choices I disagree with though. For example, I realize that to have an easy to use toolkit you have to have some level of code generation. However, in my personal and humble opinion, moc just feels like a terrible way to approach the problem. Even now I feel like there are a variety of ways you could handle code generation and automatic management of things like that. I don't like the idea of circumventing the language itself like that. It feels like one giant massive hack. -------------------------------------------------- Things that aren't working properly: -------------------------------------------------- - Settings dialog is not implemented. The dialog is complete but the code to handle the dialog hasn't been constructed yet. - There is a problem with using Qt widgets as a device target on windows, with at least OpenGL: if I have the preview widget automatically resize itself, it seems to cause some sort of video card failure that I don't understand. - Because of the above, resizing the preview widget has been disabled until I can figure out what's going on, so it's currently only a 32x32 area. - Direct3D doesn't seem to render correctly either, seems that the viewport is messed up or something. I'm sort of confused about what's going on with it. - The new main window seems to be triggering more race conditions than the wxWidgets main window dialog did. I'm not entirely sure what's going on here, but this may just be existing race conditions within libobs itself that I just never spotted before (even though I tend to be very thorough with race conditions any time I use variables cross-thread)
2014-01-23 18:53:55 +00:00
QListWidgetItem *listItem = ui->sources->item(i);
QVariant userData = listItem->data(Qt::UserRole);
if (userData.value<OBSSceneItem>() == item) {
Change the UI to Qt (work in progress) -------------------------------------------------- Notes and details -------------------------------------------------- Why was this done? Because wxWidgets was just lacking in many areas. I know wxWidgets is designed to be used with native controls, and that's great, but wxWidgets just is not a feature-complete toolkit for multiplatform applications. It lacks in dialog editors, its code is archaic and outdated, and I just feel frustrated every time I try to do things with it. Qt on the other hand.. I had to actually try Qt to realize how much better it was as a toolkit. They've got everything from dialog editors, to an IDE, a debugger, build tools, just everything, and it's all top-notch and highly maintained. The focus of the toolkit is application development, and they spend their time trying to help people do exactly that: make programs. Great support, great tools, and because of that, great toolkit. I just didn't want to alienate any developers by being stubborn about native widgets. There *are* some things that are rather lackluster about it and design choices I disagree with though. For example, I realize that to have an easy to use toolkit you have to have some level of code generation. However, in my personal and humble opinion, moc just feels like a terrible way to approach the problem. Even now I feel like there are a variety of ways you could handle code generation and automatic management of things like that. I don't like the idea of circumventing the language itself like that. It feels like one giant massive hack. -------------------------------------------------- Things that aren't working properly: -------------------------------------------------- - Settings dialog is not implemented. The dialog is complete but the code to handle the dialog hasn't been constructed yet. - There is a problem with using Qt widgets as a device target on windows, with at least OpenGL: if I have the preview widget automatically resize itself, it seems to cause some sort of video card failure that I don't understand. - Because of the above, resizing the preview widget has been disabled until I can figure out what's going on, so it's currently only a 32x32 area. - Direct3D doesn't seem to render correctly either, seems that the viewport is messed up or something. I'm sort of confused about what's going on with it. - The new main window seems to be triggering more race conditions than the wxWidgets main window dialog did. I'm not entirely sure what's going on here, but this may just be existing race conditions within libobs itself that I just never spotted before (even though I tend to be very thorough with race conditions any time I use variables cross-thread)
2014-01-23 18:53:55 +00:00
delete listItem;
break;
}
}
}
obs_source_t source = obs_sceneitem_getsource(item);
int scenes = sourceSceneRefs[source] - 1;
if (scenes == 0) {
obs_source_remove(source);
sourceSceneRefs.erase(source);
}
}
void OBSBasic::UpdateSceneSelection(OBSSource source)
{
if (source) {
obs_source_type type;
obs_source_gettype(source, &type, NULL);
Revamp API and start using doxygen The API used to be designed in such a way to where it would expect exports for each individual source/output/encoder/etc. You would export functions for each and it would automatically load those functions based on a specific naming scheme from the module. The idea behind this was that I wanted to limit the usage of structures in the API so only functions could be used. It was an interesting idea in theory, but this idea turned out to be flawed in a number of ways: 1.) Requiring exports to create sources/outputs/encoders/etc meant that you could not create them by any other means, which meant that things like faruton's .net plugin would become difficult. 2.) Export function declarations could not be checked, therefore if you created a function with the wrong parameters and parameter types, the compiler wouldn't know how to check for that. 3.) Required overly complex load functions in libobs just to handle it. It makes much more sense to just have a load function that you call manually. Complexity is the bane of all good programs. 4.) It required that you have functions of specific names, which looked and felt somewhat unsightly. So, to fix these issues, I replaced it with a more commonly used API scheme, seen commonly in places like kernels and typical C libraries with abstraction. You simply create a structure that contains the callback definitions, and you pass it to a function to register that definition (such as obs_register_source), which you call in the obs_module_load of the module. It will also automatically check the structure size and ensure that it only loads the required values if the structure happened to add new values in an API change. The "main" source file for each module must include obs-module.h, and must use OBS_DECLARE_MODULE() within that source file. Also, started writing some doxygen documentation in to the main library headers. Will add more detailed documentation as I go.
2014-02-12 15:04:50 +00:00
if (type != OBS_SOURCE_TYPE_SCENE)
Change the UI to Qt (work in progress) -------------------------------------------------- Notes and details -------------------------------------------------- Why was this done? Because wxWidgets was just lacking in many areas. I know wxWidgets is designed to be used with native controls, and that's great, but wxWidgets just is not a feature-complete toolkit for multiplatform applications. It lacks in dialog editors, its code is archaic and outdated, and I just feel frustrated every time I try to do things with it. Qt on the other hand.. I had to actually try Qt to realize how much better it was as a toolkit. They've got everything from dialog editors, to an IDE, a debugger, build tools, just everything, and it's all top-notch and highly maintained. The focus of the toolkit is application development, and they spend their time trying to help people do exactly that: make programs. Great support, great tools, and because of that, great toolkit. I just didn't want to alienate any developers by being stubborn about native widgets. There *are* some things that are rather lackluster about it and design choices I disagree with though. For example, I realize that to have an easy to use toolkit you have to have some level of code generation. However, in my personal and humble opinion, moc just feels like a terrible way to approach the problem. Even now I feel like there are a variety of ways you could handle code generation and automatic management of things like that. I don't like the idea of circumventing the language itself like that. It feels like one giant massive hack. -------------------------------------------------- Things that aren't working properly: -------------------------------------------------- - Settings dialog is not implemented. The dialog is complete but the code to handle the dialog hasn't been constructed yet. - There is a problem with using Qt widgets as a device target on windows, with at least OpenGL: if I have the preview widget automatically resize itself, it seems to cause some sort of video card failure that I don't understand. - Because of the above, resizing the preview widget has been disabled until I can figure out what's going on, so it's currently only a 32x32 area. - Direct3D doesn't seem to render correctly either, seems that the viewport is messed up or something. I'm sort of confused about what's going on with it. - The new main window seems to be triggering more race conditions than the wxWidgets main window dialog did. I'm not entirely sure what's going on here, but this may just be existing race conditions within libobs itself that I just never spotted before (even though I tend to be very thorough with race conditions any time I use variables cross-thread)
2014-01-23 18:53:55 +00:00
return;
Change the UI to Qt (work in progress) -------------------------------------------------- Notes and details -------------------------------------------------- Why was this done? Because wxWidgets was just lacking in many areas. I know wxWidgets is designed to be used with native controls, and that's great, but wxWidgets just is not a feature-complete toolkit for multiplatform applications. It lacks in dialog editors, its code is archaic and outdated, and I just feel frustrated every time I try to do things with it. Qt on the other hand.. I had to actually try Qt to realize how much better it was as a toolkit. They've got everything from dialog editors, to an IDE, a debugger, build tools, just everything, and it's all top-notch and highly maintained. The focus of the toolkit is application development, and they spend their time trying to help people do exactly that: make programs. Great support, great tools, and because of that, great toolkit. I just didn't want to alienate any developers by being stubborn about native widgets. There *are* some things that are rather lackluster about it and design choices I disagree with though. For example, I realize that to have an easy to use toolkit you have to have some level of code generation. However, in my personal and humble opinion, moc just feels like a terrible way to approach the problem. Even now I feel like there are a variety of ways you could handle code generation and automatic management of things like that. I don't like the idea of circumventing the language itself like that. It feels like one giant massive hack. -------------------------------------------------- Things that aren't working properly: -------------------------------------------------- - Settings dialog is not implemented. The dialog is complete but the code to handle the dialog hasn't been constructed yet. - There is a problem with using Qt widgets as a device target on windows, with at least OpenGL: if I have the preview widget automatically resize itself, it seems to cause some sort of video card failure that I don't understand. - Because of the above, resizing the preview widget has been disabled until I can figure out what's going on, so it's currently only a 32x32 area. - Direct3D doesn't seem to render correctly either, seems that the viewport is messed up or something. I'm sort of confused about what's going on with it. - The new main window seems to be triggering more race conditions than the wxWidgets main window dialog did. I'm not entirely sure what's going on here, but this may just be existing race conditions within libobs itself that I just never spotted before (even though I tend to be very thorough with race conditions any time I use variables cross-thread)
2014-01-23 18:53:55 +00:00
obs_scene_t scene = obs_scene_fromsource(source);
const char *name = obs_source_getname(source);
QList<QListWidgetItem*> items =
ui->scenes->findItems(QT_UTF8(name), Qt::MatchExactly);
if (items.count()) {
sceneChanging = true;
ui->scenes->setCurrentItem(items.first());
sceneChanging = false;
Change the UI to Qt (work in progress) -------------------------------------------------- Notes and details -------------------------------------------------- Why was this done? Because wxWidgets was just lacking in many areas. I know wxWidgets is designed to be used with native controls, and that's great, but wxWidgets just is not a feature-complete toolkit for multiplatform applications. It lacks in dialog editors, its code is archaic and outdated, and I just feel frustrated every time I try to do things with it. Qt on the other hand.. I had to actually try Qt to realize how much better it was as a toolkit. They've got everything from dialog editors, to an IDE, a debugger, build tools, just everything, and it's all top-notch and highly maintained. The focus of the toolkit is application development, and they spend their time trying to help people do exactly that: make programs. Great support, great tools, and because of that, great toolkit. I just didn't want to alienate any developers by being stubborn about native widgets. There *are* some things that are rather lackluster about it and design choices I disagree with though. For example, I realize that to have an easy to use toolkit you have to have some level of code generation. However, in my personal and humble opinion, moc just feels like a terrible way to approach the problem. Even now I feel like there are a variety of ways you could handle code generation and automatic management of things like that. I don't like the idea of circumventing the language itself like that. It feels like one giant massive hack. -------------------------------------------------- Things that aren't working properly: -------------------------------------------------- - Settings dialog is not implemented. The dialog is complete but the code to handle the dialog hasn't been constructed yet. - There is a problem with using Qt widgets as a device target on windows, with at least OpenGL: if I have the preview widget automatically resize itself, it seems to cause some sort of video card failure that I don't understand. - Because of the above, resizing the preview widget has been disabled until I can figure out what's going on, so it's currently only a 32x32 area. - Direct3D doesn't seem to render correctly either, seems that the viewport is messed up or something. I'm sort of confused about what's going on with it. - The new main window seems to be triggering more race conditions than the wxWidgets main window dialog did. I'm not entirely sure what's going on here, but this may just be existing race conditions within libobs itself that I just never spotted before (even though I tend to be very thorough with race conditions any time I use variables cross-thread)
2014-01-23 18:53:55 +00:00
UpdateSources(scene);
}
2013-12-29 05:29:13 +00:00
}
}
/* OBS Callbacks */
void OBSBasic::SceneItemAdded(void *data, calldata_t params)
{
OBSBasic *window = static_cast<OBSBasic*>(data);
obs_sceneitem_t item = (obs_sceneitem_t)calldata_ptr(params, "item");
2013-12-29 05:29:13 +00:00
QMetaObject::invokeMethod(window, "AddSceneItem",
Q_ARG(OBSSceneItem, OBSSceneItem(item)));
2013-12-29 05:29:13 +00:00
}
void OBSBasic::SceneItemRemoved(void *data, calldata_t params)
{
OBSBasic *window = static_cast<OBSBasic*>(data);
obs_sceneitem_t item = (obs_sceneitem_t)calldata_ptr(params, "item");
QMetaObject::invokeMethod(window, "RemoveSceneItem",
Q_ARG(OBSSceneItem, OBSSceneItem(item)));
}
void OBSBasic::SourceAdded(void *data, calldata_t params)
{
obs_source_t source = (obs_source_t)calldata_ptr(params, "source");
obs_source_type type;
obs_source_gettype(source, &type, NULL);
Revamp API and start using doxygen The API used to be designed in such a way to where it would expect exports for each individual source/output/encoder/etc. You would export functions for each and it would automatically load those functions based on a specific naming scheme from the module. The idea behind this was that I wanted to limit the usage of structures in the API so only functions could be used. It was an interesting idea in theory, but this idea turned out to be flawed in a number of ways: 1.) Requiring exports to create sources/outputs/encoders/etc meant that you could not create them by any other means, which meant that things like faruton's .net plugin would become difficult. 2.) Export function declarations could not be checked, therefore if you created a function with the wrong parameters and parameter types, the compiler wouldn't know how to check for that. 3.) Required overly complex load functions in libobs just to handle it. It makes much more sense to just have a load function that you call manually. Complexity is the bane of all good programs. 4.) It required that you have functions of specific names, which looked and felt somewhat unsightly. So, to fix these issues, I replaced it with a more commonly used API scheme, seen commonly in places like kernels and typical C libraries with abstraction. You simply create a structure that contains the callback definitions, and you pass it to a function to register that definition (such as obs_register_source), which you call in the obs_module_load of the module. It will also automatically check the structure size and ensure that it only loads the required values if the structure happened to add new values in an API change. The "main" source file for each module must include obs-module.h, and must use OBS_DECLARE_MODULE() within that source file. Also, started writing some doxygen documentation in to the main library headers. Will add more detailed documentation as I go.
2014-02-12 15:04:50 +00:00
if (type == OBS_SOURCE_TYPE_SCENE)
QMetaObject::invokeMethod(static_cast<OBSBasic*>(data),
"AddScene",
Q_ARG(OBSSource, OBSSource(source)));
}
void OBSBasic::SourceRemoved(void *data, calldata_t params)
{
obs_source_t source = (obs_source_t)calldata_ptr(params, "source");
2013-12-29 05:29:13 +00:00
obs_source_type type;
obs_source_gettype(source, &type, NULL);
Revamp API and start using doxygen The API used to be designed in such a way to where it would expect exports for each individual source/output/encoder/etc. You would export functions for each and it would automatically load those functions based on a specific naming scheme from the module. The idea behind this was that I wanted to limit the usage of structures in the API so only functions could be used. It was an interesting idea in theory, but this idea turned out to be flawed in a number of ways: 1.) Requiring exports to create sources/outputs/encoders/etc meant that you could not create them by any other means, which meant that things like faruton's .net plugin would become difficult. 2.) Export function declarations could not be checked, therefore if you created a function with the wrong parameters and parameter types, the compiler wouldn't know how to check for that. 3.) Required overly complex load functions in libobs just to handle it. It makes much more sense to just have a load function that you call manually. Complexity is the bane of all good programs. 4.) It required that you have functions of specific names, which looked and felt somewhat unsightly. So, to fix these issues, I replaced it with a more commonly used API scheme, seen commonly in places like kernels and typical C libraries with abstraction. You simply create a structure that contains the callback definitions, and you pass it to a function to register that definition (such as obs_register_source), which you call in the obs_module_load of the module. It will also automatically check the structure size and ensure that it only loads the required values if the structure happened to add new values in an API change. The "main" source file for each module must include obs-module.h, and must use OBS_DECLARE_MODULE() within that source file. Also, started writing some doxygen documentation in to the main library headers. Will add more detailed documentation as I go.
2014-02-12 15:04:50 +00:00
if (type == OBS_SOURCE_TYPE_SCENE)
QMetaObject::invokeMethod(static_cast<OBSBasic*>(data),
"RemoveScene",
Q_ARG(OBSSource, OBSSource(source)));
}
void OBSBasic::ChannelChanged(void *data, calldata_t params)
{
obs_source_t source = (obs_source_t)calldata_ptr(params, "source");
uint32_t channel = (uint32_t)calldata_int(params, "channel");
if (channel == 0)
QMetaObject::invokeMethod(static_cast<OBSBasic*>(data),
"UpdateSceneSelection",
Q_ARG(OBSSource, OBSSource(source)));
}
void OBSBasic::RenderMain(void *data, uint32_t cx, uint32_t cy)
{
OBSBasic *window = static_cast<OBSBasic*>(data);
obs_video_info ovi;
int newCX, newCY;
obs_get_video_info(&ovi);
newCX = int(window->previewScale * float(ovi.base_width));
newCY = int(window->previewScale * float(ovi.base_height));
gs_viewport_push();
gs_projection_push();
gs_ortho(0.0f, float(ovi.base_width), 0.0f, float(ovi.base_height),
-100.0f, 100.0f);
gs_setviewport(window->previewX, window->previewY, newCX, newCY);
obs_render_main_view();
gs_projection_pop();
gs_viewport_pop();
UNUSED_PARAMETER(cx);
UNUSED_PARAMETER(cy);
}
/* Main class functions */
bool OBSBasic::ResetVideo()
{
struct obs_video_info ovi;
Change the UI to Qt (work in progress) -------------------------------------------------- Notes and details -------------------------------------------------- Why was this done? Because wxWidgets was just lacking in many areas. I know wxWidgets is designed to be used with native controls, and that's great, but wxWidgets just is not a feature-complete toolkit for multiplatform applications. It lacks in dialog editors, its code is archaic and outdated, and I just feel frustrated every time I try to do things with it. Qt on the other hand.. I had to actually try Qt to realize how much better it was as a toolkit. They've got everything from dialog editors, to an IDE, a debugger, build tools, just everything, and it's all top-notch and highly maintained. The focus of the toolkit is application development, and they spend their time trying to help people do exactly that: make programs. Great support, great tools, and because of that, great toolkit. I just didn't want to alienate any developers by being stubborn about native widgets. There *are* some things that are rather lackluster about it and design choices I disagree with though. For example, I realize that to have an easy to use toolkit you have to have some level of code generation. However, in my personal and humble opinion, moc just feels like a terrible way to approach the problem. Even now I feel like there are a variety of ways you could handle code generation and automatic management of things like that. I don't like the idea of circumventing the language itself like that. It feels like one giant massive hack. -------------------------------------------------- Things that aren't working properly: -------------------------------------------------- - Settings dialog is not implemented. The dialog is complete but the code to handle the dialog hasn't been constructed yet. - There is a problem with using Qt widgets as a device target on windows, with at least OpenGL: if I have the preview widget automatically resize itself, it seems to cause some sort of video card failure that I don't understand. - Because of the above, resizing the preview widget has been disabled until I can figure out what's going on, so it's currently only a 32x32 area. - Direct3D doesn't seem to render correctly either, seems that the viewport is messed up or something. I'm sort of confused about what's going on with it. - The new main window seems to be triggering more race conditions than the wxWidgets main window dialog did. I'm not entirely sure what's going on here, but this may just be existing race conditions within libobs itself that I just never spotted before (even though I tend to be very thorough with race conditions any time I use variables cross-thread)
2014-01-23 18:53:55 +00:00
GetConfigFPS(ovi.fps_num, ovi.fps_den);
Change the UI to Qt (work in progress) -------------------------------------------------- Notes and details -------------------------------------------------- Why was this done? Because wxWidgets was just lacking in many areas. I know wxWidgets is designed to be used with native controls, and that's great, but wxWidgets just is not a feature-complete toolkit for multiplatform applications. It lacks in dialog editors, its code is archaic and outdated, and I just feel frustrated every time I try to do things with it. Qt on the other hand.. I had to actually try Qt to realize how much better it was as a toolkit. They've got everything from dialog editors, to an IDE, a debugger, build tools, just everything, and it's all top-notch and highly maintained. The focus of the toolkit is application development, and they spend their time trying to help people do exactly that: make programs. Great support, great tools, and because of that, great toolkit. I just didn't want to alienate any developers by being stubborn about native widgets. There *are* some things that are rather lackluster about it and design choices I disagree with though. For example, I realize that to have an easy to use toolkit you have to have some level of code generation. However, in my personal and humble opinion, moc just feels like a terrible way to approach the problem. Even now I feel like there are a variety of ways you could handle code generation and automatic management of things like that. I don't like the idea of circumventing the language itself like that. It feels like one giant massive hack. -------------------------------------------------- Things that aren't working properly: -------------------------------------------------- - Settings dialog is not implemented. The dialog is complete but the code to handle the dialog hasn't been constructed yet. - There is a problem with using Qt widgets as a device target on windows, with at least OpenGL: if I have the preview widget automatically resize itself, it seems to cause some sort of video card failure that I don't understand. - Because of the above, resizing the preview widget has been disabled until I can figure out what's going on, so it's currently only a 32x32 area. - Direct3D doesn't seem to render correctly either, seems that the viewport is messed up or something. I'm sort of confused about what's going on with it. - The new main window seems to be triggering more race conditions than the wxWidgets main window dialog did. I'm not entirely sure what's going on here, but this may just be existing race conditions within libobs itself that I just never spotted before (even though I tend to be very thorough with race conditions any time I use variables cross-thread)
2014-01-23 18:53:55 +00:00
ovi.graphics_module = App()->GetRenderModule();
ovi.base_width = (uint32_t)config_get_uint(basicConfig,
"Video", "BaseCX");
ovi.base_height = (uint32_t)config_get_uint(basicConfig,
"Video", "BaseCY");
ovi.output_width = (uint32_t)config_get_uint(basicConfig,
"Video", "OutputCX");
ovi.output_height = (uint32_t)config_get_uint(basicConfig,
"Video", "OutputCY");
//ovi.output_format = VIDEO_FORMAT_I420;
ovi.output_format = VIDEO_FORMAT_NV12;
ovi.adapter = 0;
ovi.gpu_conversion = true;
QTToGSWindow(ui->preview->winId(), ovi.window);
//required to make opengl display stuff on osx(?)
2013-12-31 11:02:07 +00:00
ResizePreview(ovi.base_width, ovi.base_height);
QSize size = GetPixelSize(ui->preview);
Change the UI to Qt (work in progress) -------------------------------------------------- Notes and details -------------------------------------------------- Why was this done? Because wxWidgets was just lacking in many areas. I know wxWidgets is designed to be used with native controls, and that's great, but wxWidgets just is not a feature-complete toolkit for multiplatform applications. It lacks in dialog editors, its code is archaic and outdated, and I just feel frustrated every time I try to do things with it. Qt on the other hand.. I had to actually try Qt to realize how much better it was as a toolkit. They've got everything from dialog editors, to an IDE, a debugger, build tools, just everything, and it's all top-notch and highly maintained. The focus of the toolkit is application development, and they spend their time trying to help people do exactly that: make programs. Great support, great tools, and because of that, great toolkit. I just didn't want to alienate any developers by being stubborn about native widgets. There *are* some things that are rather lackluster about it and design choices I disagree with though. For example, I realize that to have an easy to use toolkit you have to have some level of code generation. However, in my personal and humble opinion, moc just feels like a terrible way to approach the problem. Even now I feel like there are a variety of ways you could handle code generation and automatic management of things like that. I don't like the idea of circumventing the language itself like that. It feels like one giant massive hack. -------------------------------------------------- Things that aren't working properly: -------------------------------------------------- - Settings dialog is not implemented. The dialog is complete but the code to handle the dialog hasn't been constructed yet. - There is a problem with using Qt widgets as a device target on windows, with at least OpenGL: if I have the preview widget automatically resize itself, it seems to cause some sort of video card failure that I don't understand. - Because of the above, resizing the preview widget has been disabled until I can figure out what's going on, so it's currently only a 32x32 area. - Direct3D doesn't seem to render correctly either, seems that the viewport is messed up or something. I'm sort of confused about what's going on with it. - The new main window seems to be triggering more race conditions than the wxWidgets main window dialog did. I'm not entirely sure what's going on here, but this may just be existing race conditions within libobs itself that I just never spotted before (even though I tend to be very thorough with race conditions any time I use variables cross-thread)
2014-01-23 18:53:55 +00:00
ovi.window_width = size.width();
ovi.window_height = size.height();
2013-12-31 11:02:07 +00:00
if (!obs_reset_video(&ovi))
return false;
obs_add_draw_callback(OBSBasic::RenderMain, this);
return true;
}
2013-12-31 11:02:07 +00:00
bool OBSBasic::ResetAudio()
{
struct audio_output_info ai;
ai.name = "Main Audio Track";
ai.format = AUDIO_FORMAT_FLOAT;
ai.samples_per_sec = config_get_uint(basicConfig, "Audio",
"SampleRate");
const char *channelSetupStr = config_get_string(basicConfig,
"Audio", "ChannelSetup");
if (strcmp(channelSetupStr, "Mono") == 0)
ai.speakers = SPEAKERS_MONO;
else
ai.speakers = SPEAKERS_STEREO;
ai.buffer_ms = config_get_uint(basicConfig, "Audio", "BufferingTime");
return obs_reset_audio(&ai);
}
void OBSBasic::ResetAudioDevice(const char *sourceId, const char *deviceName,
int channel)
{
const char *deviceId = config_get_string(basicConfig, "Audio",
deviceName);
obs_source_t source;
obs_data_t settings;
bool same = false;
source = obs_get_output_source(channel);
if (source) {
settings = obs_source_getsettings(source);
const char *curId = obs_data_getstring(settings, "device_id");
same = (strcmp(curId, deviceId) == 0);
obs_data_release(settings);
obs_source_release(source);
}
if (!same)
obs_set_output_source(channel, nullptr);
if (!same && strcmp(deviceId, "disabled") != 0) {
obs_data_t settings = obs_data_create();
obs_data_setstring(settings, "device_id", deviceId);
source = obs_source_create(OBS_SOURCE_TYPE_INPUT,
sourceId, deviceName, settings);
obs_data_release(settings);
obs_set_output_source(channel, source);
obs_source_release(source);
}
}
void OBSBasic::ResetAudioDevices()
{
ResetAudioDevice(App()->OutputAudioSource(), "DesktopDevice1", 1);
ResetAudioDevice(App()->OutputAudioSource(), "DesktopDevice2", 2);
ResetAudioDevice(App()->InputAudioSource(), "AuxDevice1", 3);
ResetAudioDevice(App()->InputAudioSource(), "AuxDevice2", 4);
ResetAudioDevice(App()->InputAudioSource(), "AuxDevice3", 5);
}
2013-12-31 11:02:07 +00:00
void OBSBasic::ResizePreview(uint32_t cx, uint32_t cy)
{
QSize targetSize;
Change the UI to Qt (work in progress) -------------------------------------------------- Notes and details -------------------------------------------------- Why was this done? Because wxWidgets was just lacking in many areas. I know wxWidgets is designed to be used with native controls, and that's great, but wxWidgets just is not a feature-complete toolkit for multiplatform applications. It lacks in dialog editors, its code is archaic and outdated, and I just feel frustrated every time I try to do things with it. Qt on the other hand.. I had to actually try Qt to realize how much better it was as a toolkit. They've got everything from dialog editors, to an IDE, a debugger, build tools, just everything, and it's all top-notch and highly maintained. The focus of the toolkit is application development, and they spend their time trying to help people do exactly that: make programs. Great support, great tools, and because of that, great toolkit. I just didn't want to alienate any developers by being stubborn about native widgets. There *are* some things that are rather lackluster about it and design choices I disagree with though. For example, I realize that to have an easy to use toolkit you have to have some level of code generation. However, in my personal and humble opinion, moc just feels like a terrible way to approach the problem. Even now I feel like there are a variety of ways you could handle code generation and automatic management of things like that. I don't like the idea of circumventing the language itself like that. It feels like one giant massive hack. -------------------------------------------------- Things that aren't working properly: -------------------------------------------------- - Settings dialog is not implemented. The dialog is complete but the code to handle the dialog hasn't been constructed yet. - There is a problem with using Qt widgets as a device target on windows, with at least OpenGL: if I have the preview widget automatically resize itself, it seems to cause some sort of video card failure that I don't understand. - Because of the above, resizing the preview widget has been disabled until I can figure out what's going on, so it's currently only a 32x32 area. - Direct3D doesn't seem to render correctly either, seems that the viewport is messed up or something. I'm sort of confused about what's going on with it. - The new main window seems to be triggering more race conditions than the wxWidgets main window dialog did. I'm not entirely sure what's going on here, but this may just be existing race conditions within libobs itself that I just never spotted before (even though I tend to be very thorough with race conditions any time I use variables cross-thread)
2014-01-23 18:53:55 +00:00
/* resize preview panel to fix to the top section of the window */
targetSize = GetPixelSize(ui->preview);
Add source properties window (very preliminary) - Add a properties window for sources so that you can now actually edit the settings for sources. Also, display the source by itself in the window (Note: not working on mac, and possibly not working on linux). When changing the settings for a source, it will call obs_source_update on that source when you have modified any values automatically. - Add a properties 'widget', eventually I want to turn this in to a regular nice properties view like you'd see in the designer, but right now it just uses a form layout in a QScrollArea with regular controls to display the properties. It's clunky but works for the time being. - Make it so that swap chains and the main graphics subsystem will automatically use at least one backbuffer if none was specified - Fix bug where displays weren't added to the main display array - Make it so that you can get the properties of a source via the actual pointer of a source/encoder/output in addition to being able to look up properties via identifier. - When registering source types, check for required functions (wasn't doing it before). getheight/getwidth should not be optional if it's a video source as well. - Add an RAII OBSObj wrapper to obs.hpp for non-reference-counted libobs pointers - Add an RAII OBSSignal wrapper to obs.hpp for libobs signals to automatically disconnect them on destruction - Move the "scale and center" calculation in window-basic-main.cpp to its own function and in its own source file - Add an 'update' callback to WASAPI audio sources
2014-03-23 08:07:54 +00:00
GetScaleAndCenterPos(int(cx), int(cy),
targetSize.width(), targetSize.height(),
previewX, previewY, previewScale);
Change the UI to Qt (work in progress) -------------------------------------------------- Notes and details -------------------------------------------------- Why was this done? Because wxWidgets was just lacking in many areas. I know wxWidgets is designed to be used with native controls, and that's great, but wxWidgets just is not a feature-complete toolkit for multiplatform applications. It lacks in dialog editors, its code is archaic and outdated, and I just feel frustrated every time I try to do things with it. Qt on the other hand.. I had to actually try Qt to realize how much better it was as a toolkit. They've got everything from dialog editors, to an IDE, a debugger, build tools, just everything, and it's all top-notch and highly maintained. The focus of the toolkit is application development, and they spend their time trying to help people do exactly that: make programs. Great support, great tools, and because of that, great toolkit. I just didn't want to alienate any developers by being stubborn about native widgets. There *are* some things that are rather lackluster about it and design choices I disagree with though. For example, I realize that to have an easy to use toolkit you have to have some level of code generation. However, in my personal and humble opinion, moc just feels like a terrible way to approach the problem. Even now I feel like there are a variety of ways you could handle code generation and automatic management of things like that. I don't like the idea of circumventing the language itself like that. It feels like one giant massive hack. -------------------------------------------------- Things that aren't working properly: -------------------------------------------------- - Settings dialog is not implemented. The dialog is complete but the code to handle the dialog hasn't been constructed yet. - There is a problem with using Qt widgets as a device target on windows, with at least OpenGL: if I have the preview widget automatically resize itself, it seems to cause some sort of video card failure that I don't understand. - Because of the above, resizing the preview widget has been disabled until I can figure out what's going on, so it's currently only a 32x32 area. - Direct3D doesn't seem to render correctly either, seems that the viewport is messed up or something. I'm sort of confused about what's going on with it. - The new main window seems to be triggering more race conditions than the wxWidgets main window dialog did. I'm not entirely sure what's going on here, but this may just be existing race conditions within libobs itself that I just never spotted before (even though I tend to be very thorough with race conditions any time I use variables cross-thread)
2014-01-23 18:53:55 +00:00
if (isVisible()) {
if (resizeTimer)
killTimer(resizeTimer);
resizeTimer = startTimer(100);
}
2013-12-31 11:02:07 +00:00
}
Change the UI to Qt (work in progress) -------------------------------------------------- Notes and details -------------------------------------------------- Why was this done? Because wxWidgets was just lacking in many areas. I know wxWidgets is designed to be used with native controls, and that's great, but wxWidgets just is not a feature-complete toolkit for multiplatform applications. It lacks in dialog editors, its code is archaic and outdated, and I just feel frustrated every time I try to do things with it. Qt on the other hand.. I had to actually try Qt to realize how much better it was as a toolkit. They've got everything from dialog editors, to an IDE, a debugger, build tools, just everything, and it's all top-notch and highly maintained. The focus of the toolkit is application development, and they spend their time trying to help people do exactly that: make programs. Great support, great tools, and because of that, great toolkit. I just didn't want to alienate any developers by being stubborn about native widgets. There *are* some things that are rather lackluster about it and design choices I disagree with though. For example, I realize that to have an easy to use toolkit you have to have some level of code generation. However, in my personal and humble opinion, moc just feels like a terrible way to approach the problem. Even now I feel like there are a variety of ways you could handle code generation and automatic management of things like that. I don't like the idea of circumventing the language itself like that. It feels like one giant massive hack. -------------------------------------------------- Things that aren't working properly: -------------------------------------------------- - Settings dialog is not implemented. The dialog is complete but the code to handle the dialog hasn't been constructed yet. - There is a problem with using Qt widgets as a device target on windows, with at least OpenGL: if I have the preview widget automatically resize itself, it seems to cause some sort of video card failure that I don't understand. - Because of the above, resizing the preview widget has been disabled until I can figure out what's going on, so it's currently only a 32x32 area. - Direct3D doesn't seem to render correctly either, seems that the viewport is messed up or something. I'm sort of confused about what's going on with it. - The new main window seems to be triggering more race conditions than the wxWidgets main window dialog did. I'm not entirely sure what's going on here, but this may just be existing race conditions within libobs itself that I just never spotted before (even though I tend to be very thorough with race conditions any time I use variables cross-thread)
2014-01-23 18:53:55 +00:00
void OBSBasic::closeEvent(QCloseEvent *event)
2013-12-31 11:02:07 +00:00
{
QWidget::closeEvent(event);
if (!event->isAccepted())
return;
// remove draw callback in case our drawable surfaces go away before
// the destructor gets called
obs_remove_draw_callback(OBSBasic::RenderMain, this);
}
Change the UI to Qt (work in progress) -------------------------------------------------- Notes and details -------------------------------------------------- Why was this done? Because wxWidgets was just lacking in many areas. I know wxWidgets is designed to be used with native controls, and that's great, but wxWidgets just is not a feature-complete toolkit for multiplatform applications. It lacks in dialog editors, its code is archaic and outdated, and I just feel frustrated every time I try to do things with it. Qt on the other hand.. I had to actually try Qt to realize how much better it was as a toolkit. They've got everything from dialog editors, to an IDE, a debugger, build tools, just everything, and it's all top-notch and highly maintained. The focus of the toolkit is application development, and they spend their time trying to help people do exactly that: make programs. Great support, great tools, and because of that, great toolkit. I just didn't want to alienate any developers by being stubborn about native widgets. There *are* some things that are rather lackluster about it and design choices I disagree with though. For example, I realize that to have an easy to use toolkit you have to have some level of code generation. However, in my personal and humble opinion, moc just feels like a terrible way to approach the problem. Even now I feel like there are a variety of ways you could handle code generation and automatic management of things like that. I don't like the idea of circumventing the language itself like that. It feels like one giant massive hack. -------------------------------------------------- Things that aren't working properly: -------------------------------------------------- - Settings dialog is not implemented. The dialog is complete but the code to handle the dialog hasn't been constructed yet. - There is a problem with using Qt widgets as a device target on windows, with at least OpenGL: if I have the preview widget automatically resize itself, it seems to cause some sort of video card failure that I don't understand. - Because of the above, resizing the preview widget has been disabled until I can figure out what's going on, so it's currently only a 32x32 area. - Direct3D doesn't seem to render correctly either, seems that the viewport is messed up or something. I'm sort of confused about what's going on with it. - The new main window seems to be triggering more race conditions than the wxWidgets main window dialog did. I'm not entirely sure what's going on here, but this may just be existing race conditions within libobs itself that I just never spotted before (even though I tend to be very thorough with race conditions any time I use variables cross-thread)
2014-01-23 18:53:55 +00:00
void OBSBasic::changeEvent(QEvent *event)
{
/* TODO */
UNUSED_PARAMETER(event);
}
Change the UI to Qt (work in progress) -------------------------------------------------- Notes and details -------------------------------------------------- Why was this done? Because wxWidgets was just lacking in many areas. I know wxWidgets is designed to be used with native controls, and that's great, but wxWidgets just is not a feature-complete toolkit for multiplatform applications. It lacks in dialog editors, its code is archaic and outdated, and I just feel frustrated every time I try to do things with it. Qt on the other hand.. I had to actually try Qt to realize how much better it was as a toolkit. They've got everything from dialog editors, to an IDE, a debugger, build tools, just everything, and it's all top-notch and highly maintained. The focus of the toolkit is application development, and they spend their time trying to help people do exactly that: make programs. Great support, great tools, and because of that, great toolkit. I just didn't want to alienate any developers by being stubborn about native widgets. There *are* some things that are rather lackluster about it and design choices I disagree with though. For example, I realize that to have an easy to use toolkit you have to have some level of code generation. However, in my personal and humble opinion, moc just feels like a terrible way to approach the problem. Even now I feel like there are a variety of ways you could handle code generation and automatic management of things like that. I don't like the idea of circumventing the language itself like that. It feels like one giant massive hack. -------------------------------------------------- Things that aren't working properly: -------------------------------------------------- - Settings dialog is not implemented. The dialog is complete but the code to handle the dialog hasn't been constructed yet. - There is a problem with using Qt widgets as a device target on windows, with at least OpenGL: if I have the preview widget automatically resize itself, it seems to cause some sort of video card failure that I don't understand. - Because of the above, resizing the preview widget has been disabled until I can figure out what's going on, so it's currently only a 32x32 area. - Direct3D doesn't seem to render correctly either, seems that the viewport is messed up or something. I'm sort of confused about what's going on with it. - The new main window seems to be triggering more race conditions than the wxWidgets main window dialog did. I'm not entirely sure what's going on here, but this may just be existing race conditions within libobs itself that I just never spotted before (even though I tend to be very thorough with race conditions any time I use variables cross-thread)
2014-01-23 18:53:55 +00:00
void OBSBasic::resizeEvent(QResizeEvent *event)
{
Change the UI to Qt (work in progress) -------------------------------------------------- Notes and details -------------------------------------------------- Why was this done? Because wxWidgets was just lacking in many areas. I know wxWidgets is designed to be used with native controls, and that's great, but wxWidgets just is not a feature-complete toolkit for multiplatform applications. It lacks in dialog editors, its code is archaic and outdated, and I just feel frustrated every time I try to do things with it. Qt on the other hand.. I had to actually try Qt to realize how much better it was as a toolkit. They've got everything from dialog editors, to an IDE, a debugger, build tools, just everything, and it's all top-notch and highly maintained. The focus of the toolkit is application development, and they spend their time trying to help people do exactly that: make programs. Great support, great tools, and because of that, great toolkit. I just didn't want to alienate any developers by being stubborn about native widgets. There *are* some things that are rather lackluster about it and design choices I disagree with though. For example, I realize that to have an easy to use toolkit you have to have some level of code generation. However, in my personal and humble opinion, moc just feels like a terrible way to approach the problem. Even now I feel like there are a variety of ways you could handle code generation and automatic management of things like that. I don't like the idea of circumventing the language itself like that. It feels like one giant massive hack. -------------------------------------------------- Things that aren't working properly: -------------------------------------------------- - Settings dialog is not implemented. The dialog is complete but the code to handle the dialog hasn't been constructed yet. - There is a problem with using Qt widgets as a device target on windows, with at least OpenGL: if I have the preview widget automatically resize itself, it seems to cause some sort of video card failure that I don't understand. - Because of the above, resizing the preview widget has been disabled until I can figure out what's going on, so it's currently only a 32x32 area. - Direct3D doesn't seem to render correctly either, seems that the viewport is messed up or something. I'm sort of confused about what's going on with it. - The new main window seems to be triggering more race conditions than the wxWidgets main window dialog did. I'm not entirely sure what's going on here, but this may just be existing race conditions within libobs itself that I just never spotted before (even though I tend to be very thorough with race conditions any time I use variables cross-thread)
2014-01-23 18:53:55 +00:00
struct obs_video_info ovi;
if (obs_get_video_info(&ovi))
ResizePreview(ovi.base_width, ovi.base_height);
UNUSED_PARAMETER(event);
}
void OBSBasic::timerEvent(QTimerEvent *event)
{
if (event->timerId() == resizeTimer) {
killTimer(resizeTimer);
resizeTimer = 0;
QSize size = GetPixelSize(ui->preview);
obs_resize(size.width(), size.height());
}
}
Change the UI to Qt (work in progress) -------------------------------------------------- Notes and details -------------------------------------------------- Why was this done? Because wxWidgets was just lacking in many areas. I know wxWidgets is designed to be used with native controls, and that's great, but wxWidgets just is not a feature-complete toolkit for multiplatform applications. It lacks in dialog editors, its code is archaic and outdated, and I just feel frustrated every time I try to do things with it. Qt on the other hand.. I had to actually try Qt to realize how much better it was as a toolkit. They've got everything from dialog editors, to an IDE, a debugger, build tools, just everything, and it's all top-notch and highly maintained. The focus of the toolkit is application development, and they spend their time trying to help people do exactly that: make programs. Great support, great tools, and because of that, great toolkit. I just didn't want to alienate any developers by being stubborn about native widgets. There *are* some things that are rather lackluster about it and design choices I disagree with though. For example, I realize that to have an easy to use toolkit you have to have some level of code generation. However, in my personal and humble opinion, moc just feels like a terrible way to approach the problem. Even now I feel like there are a variety of ways you could handle code generation and automatic management of things like that. I don't like the idea of circumventing the language itself like that. It feels like one giant massive hack. -------------------------------------------------- Things that aren't working properly: -------------------------------------------------- - Settings dialog is not implemented. The dialog is complete but the code to handle the dialog hasn't been constructed yet. - There is a problem with using Qt widgets as a device target on windows, with at least OpenGL: if I have the preview widget automatically resize itself, it seems to cause some sort of video card failure that I don't understand. - Because of the above, resizing the preview widget has been disabled until I can figure out what's going on, so it's currently only a 32x32 area. - Direct3D doesn't seem to render correctly either, seems that the viewport is messed up or something. I'm sort of confused about what's going on with it. - The new main window seems to be triggering more race conditions than the wxWidgets main window dialog did. I'm not entirely sure what's going on here, but this may just be existing race conditions within libobs itself that I just never spotted before (even though I tend to be very thorough with race conditions any time I use variables cross-thread)
2014-01-23 18:53:55 +00:00
void OBSBasic::on_action_New_triggered()
{
/* TODO */
}
Change the UI to Qt (work in progress) -------------------------------------------------- Notes and details -------------------------------------------------- Why was this done? Because wxWidgets was just lacking in many areas. I know wxWidgets is designed to be used with native controls, and that's great, but wxWidgets just is not a feature-complete toolkit for multiplatform applications. It lacks in dialog editors, its code is archaic and outdated, and I just feel frustrated every time I try to do things with it. Qt on the other hand.. I had to actually try Qt to realize how much better it was as a toolkit. They've got everything from dialog editors, to an IDE, a debugger, build tools, just everything, and it's all top-notch and highly maintained. The focus of the toolkit is application development, and they spend their time trying to help people do exactly that: make programs. Great support, great tools, and because of that, great toolkit. I just didn't want to alienate any developers by being stubborn about native widgets. There *are* some things that are rather lackluster about it and design choices I disagree with though. For example, I realize that to have an easy to use toolkit you have to have some level of code generation. However, in my personal and humble opinion, moc just feels like a terrible way to approach the problem. Even now I feel like there are a variety of ways you could handle code generation and automatic management of things like that. I don't like the idea of circumventing the language itself like that. It feels like one giant massive hack. -------------------------------------------------- Things that aren't working properly: -------------------------------------------------- - Settings dialog is not implemented. The dialog is complete but the code to handle the dialog hasn't been constructed yet. - There is a problem with using Qt widgets as a device target on windows, with at least OpenGL: if I have the preview widget automatically resize itself, it seems to cause some sort of video card failure that I don't understand. - Because of the above, resizing the preview widget has been disabled until I can figure out what's going on, so it's currently only a 32x32 area. - Direct3D doesn't seem to render correctly either, seems that the viewport is messed up or something. I'm sort of confused about what's going on with it. - The new main window seems to be triggering more race conditions than the wxWidgets main window dialog did. I'm not entirely sure what's going on here, but this may just be existing race conditions within libobs itself that I just never spotted before (even though I tend to be very thorough with race conditions any time I use variables cross-thread)
2014-01-23 18:53:55 +00:00
void OBSBasic::on_action_Open_triggered()
{
/* TODO */
}
Change the UI to Qt (work in progress) -------------------------------------------------- Notes and details -------------------------------------------------- Why was this done? Because wxWidgets was just lacking in many areas. I know wxWidgets is designed to be used with native controls, and that's great, but wxWidgets just is not a feature-complete toolkit for multiplatform applications. It lacks in dialog editors, its code is archaic and outdated, and I just feel frustrated every time I try to do things with it. Qt on the other hand.. I had to actually try Qt to realize how much better it was as a toolkit. They've got everything from dialog editors, to an IDE, a debugger, build tools, just everything, and it's all top-notch and highly maintained. The focus of the toolkit is application development, and they spend their time trying to help people do exactly that: make programs. Great support, great tools, and because of that, great toolkit. I just didn't want to alienate any developers by being stubborn about native widgets. There *are* some things that are rather lackluster about it and design choices I disagree with though. For example, I realize that to have an easy to use toolkit you have to have some level of code generation. However, in my personal and humble opinion, moc just feels like a terrible way to approach the problem. Even now I feel like there are a variety of ways you could handle code generation and automatic management of things like that. I don't like the idea of circumventing the language itself like that. It feels like one giant massive hack. -------------------------------------------------- Things that aren't working properly: -------------------------------------------------- - Settings dialog is not implemented. The dialog is complete but the code to handle the dialog hasn't been constructed yet. - There is a problem with using Qt widgets as a device target on windows, with at least OpenGL: if I have the preview widget automatically resize itself, it seems to cause some sort of video card failure that I don't understand. - Because of the above, resizing the preview widget has been disabled until I can figure out what's going on, so it's currently only a 32x32 area. - Direct3D doesn't seem to render correctly either, seems that the viewport is messed up or something. I'm sort of confused about what's going on with it. - The new main window seems to be triggering more race conditions than the wxWidgets main window dialog did. I'm not entirely sure what's going on here, but this may just be existing race conditions within libobs itself that I just never spotted before (even though I tend to be very thorough with race conditions any time I use variables cross-thread)
2014-01-23 18:53:55 +00:00
void OBSBasic::on_action_Save_triggered()
{
/* TODO */
}
void OBSBasic::on_action_Settings_triggered()
{
OBSBasicSettings settings(this);
settings.exec();
}
void OBSBasic::on_scenes_currentItemChanged(QListWidgetItem *current,
QListWidgetItem *prev)
{
obs_source_t source = NULL;
Change the UI to Qt (work in progress) -------------------------------------------------- Notes and details -------------------------------------------------- Why was this done? Because wxWidgets was just lacking in many areas. I know wxWidgets is designed to be used with native controls, and that's great, but wxWidgets just is not a feature-complete toolkit for multiplatform applications. It lacks in dialog editors, its code is archaic and outdated, and I just feel frustrated every time I try to do things with it. Qt on the other hand.. I had to actually try Qt to realize how much better it was as a toolkit. They've got everything from dialog editors, to an IDE, a debugger, build tools, just everything, and it's all top-notch and highly maintained. The focus of the toolkit is application development, and they spend their time trying to help people do exactly that: make programs. Great support, great tools, and because of that, great toolkit. I just didn't want to alienate any developers by being stubborn about native widgets. There *are* some things that are rather lackluster about it and design choices I disagree with though. For example, I realize that to have an easy to use toolkit you have to have some level of code generation. However, in my personal and humble opinion, moc just feels like a terrible way to approach the problem. Even now I feel like there are a variety of ways you could handle code generation and automatic management of things like that. I don't like the idea of circumventing the language itself like that. It feels like one giant massive hack. -------------------------------------------------- Things that aren't working properly: -------------------------------------------------- - Settings dialog is not implemented. The dialog is complete but the code to handle the dialog hasn't been constructed yet. - There is a problem with using Qt widgets as a device target on windows, with at least OpenGL: if I have the preview widget automatically resize itself, it seems to cause some sort of video card failure that I don't understand. - Because of the above, resizing the preview widget has been disabled until I can figure out what's going on, so it's currently only a 32x32 area. - Direct3D doesn't seem to render correctly either, seems that the viewport is messed up or something. I'm sort of confused about what's going on with it. - The new main window seems to be triggering more race conditions than the wxWidgets main window dialog did. I'm not entirely sure what's going on here, but this may just be existing race conditions within libobs itself that I just never spotted before (even though I tend to be very thorough with race conditions any time I use variables cross-thread)
2014-01-23 18:53:55 +00:00
if (sceneChanging)
return;
if (current) {
Change the UI to Qt (work in progress) -------------------------------------------------- Notes and details -------------------------------------------------- Why was this done? Because wxWidgets was just lacking in many areas. I know wxWidgets is designed to be used with native controls, and that's great, but wxWidgets just is not a feature-complete toolkit for multiplatform applications. It lacks in dialog editors, its code is archaic and outdated, and I just feel frustrated every time I try to do things with it. Qt on the other hand.. I had to actually try Qt to realize how much better it was as a toolkit. They've got everything from dialog editors, to an IDE, a debugger, build tools, just everything, and it's all top-notch and highly maintained. The focus of the toolkit is application development, and they spend their time trying to help people do exactly that: make programs. Great support, great tools, and because of that, great toolkit. I just didn't want to alienate any developers by being stubborn about native widgets. There *are* some things that are rather lackluster about it and design choices I disagree with though. For example, I realize that to have an easy to use toolkit you have to have some level of code generation. However, in my personal and humble opinion, moc just feels like a terrible way to approach the problem. Even now I feel like there are a variety of ways you could handle code generation and automatic management of things like that. I don't like the idea of circumventing the language itself like that. It feels like one giant massive hack. -------------------------------------------------- Things that aren't working properly: -------------------------------------------------- - Settings dialog is not implemented. The dialog is complete but the code to handle the dialog hasn't been constructed yet. - There is a problem with using Qt widgets as a device target on windows, with at least OpenGL: if I have the preview widget automatically resize itself, it seems to cause some sort of video card failure that I don't understand. - Because of the above, resizing the preview widget has been disabled until I can figure out what's going on, so it's currently only a 32x32 area. - Direct3D doesn't seem to render correctly either, seems that the viewport is messed up or something. I'm sort of confused about what's going on with it. - The new main window seems to be triggering more race conditions than the wxWidgets main window dialog did. I'm not entirely sure what's going on here, but this may just be existing race conditions within libobs itself that I just never spotted before (even though I tend to be very thorough with race conditions any time I use variables cross-thread)
2014-01-23 18:53:55 +00:00
obs_scene_t scene;
scene = current->data(Qt::UserRole).value<OBSScene>();
source = obs_scene_getsource(scene);
}
/* TODO: allow transitions */
obs_set_output_source(0, source);
UNUSED_PARAMETER(prev);
}
Change the UI to Qt (work in progress) -------------------------------------------------- Notes and details -------------------------------------------------- Why was this done? Because wxWidgets was just lacking in many areas. I know wxWidgets is designed to be used with native controls, and that's great, but wxWidgets just is not a feature-complete toolkit for multiplatform applications. It lacks in dialog editors, its code is archaic and outdated, and I just feel frustrated every time I try to do things with it. Qt on the other hand.. I had to actually try Qt to realize how much better it was as a toolkit. They've got everything from dialog editors, to an IDE, a debugger, build tools, just everything, and it's all top-notch and highly maintained. The focus of the toolkit is application development, and they spend their time trying to help people do exactly that: make programs. Great support, great tools, and because of that, great toolkit. I just didn't want to alienate any developers by being stubborn about native widgets. There *are* some things that are rather lackluster about it and design choices I disagree with though. For example, I realize that to have an easy to use toolkit you have to have some level of code generation. However, in my personal and humble opinion, moc just feels like a terrible way to approach the problem. Even now I feel like there are a variety of ways you could handle code generation and automatic management of things like that. I don't like the idea of circumventing the language itself like that. It feels like one giant massive hack. -------------------------------------------------- Things that aren't working properly: -------------------------------------------------- - Settings dialog is not implemented. The dialog is complete but the code to handle the dialog hasn't been constructed yet. - There is a problem with using Qt widgets as a device target on windows, with at least OpenGL: if I have the preview widget automatically resize itself, it seems to cause some sort of video card failure that I don't understand. - Because of the above, resizing the preview widget has been disabled until I can figure out what's going on, so it's currently only a 32x32 area. - Direct3D doesn't seem to render correctly either, seems that the viewport is messed up or something. I'm sort of confused about what's going on with it. - The new main window seems to be triggering more race conditions than the wxWidgets main window dialog did. I'm not entirely sure what's going on here, but this may just be existing race conditions within libobs itself that I just never spotted before (even though I tend to be very thorough with race conditions any time I use variables cross-thread)
2014-01-23 18:53:55 +00:00
void OBSBasic::on_scenes_customContextMenuRequested(const QPoint &pos)
{
/* TODO */
UNUSED_PARAMETER(pos);
}
Change the UI to Qt (work in progress) -------------------------------------------------- Notes and details -------------------------------------------------- Why was this done? Because wxWidgets was just lacking in many areas. I know wxWidgets is designed to be used with native controls, and that's great, but wxWidgets just is not a feature-complete toolkit for multiplatform applications. It lacks in dialog editors, its code is archaic and outdated, and I just feel frustrated every time I try to do things with it. Qt on the other hand.. I had to actually try Qt to realize how much better it was as a toolkit. They've got everything from dialog editors, to an IDE, a debugger, build tools, just everything, and it's all top-notch and highly maintained. The focus of the toolkit is application development, and they spend their time trying to help people do exactly that: make programs. Great support, great tools, and because of that, great toolkit. I just didn't want to alienate any developers by being stubborn about native widgets. There *are* some things that are rather lackluster about it and design choices I disagree with though. For example, I realize that to have an easy to use toolkit you have to have some level of code generation. However, in my personal and humble opinion, moc just feels like a terrible way to approach the problem. Even now I feel like there are a variety of ways you could handle code generation and automatic management of things like that. I don't like the idea of circumventing the language itself like that. It feels like one giant massive hack. -------------------------------------------------- Things that aren't working properly: -------------------------------------------------- - Settings dialog is not implemented. The dialog is complete but the code to handle the dialog hasn't been constructed yet. - There is a problem with using Qt widgets as a device target on windows, with at least OpenGL: if I have the preview widget automatically resize itself, it seems to cause some sort of video card failure that I don't understand. - Because of the above, resizing the preview widget has been disabled until I can figure out what's going on, so it's currently only a 32x32 area. - Direct3D doesn't seem to render correctly either, seems that the viewport is messed up or something. I'm sort of confused about what's going on with it. - The new main window seems to be triggering more race conditions than the wxWidgets main window dialog did. I'm not entirely sure what's going on here, but this may just be existing race conditions within libobs itself that I just never spotted before (even though I tend to be very thorough with race conditions any time I use variables cross-thread)
2014-01-23 18:53:55 +00:00
void OBSBasic::on_actionAddScene_triggered()
{
string name;
Change the UI to Qt (work in progress) -------------------------------------------------- Notes and details -------------------------------------------------- Why was this done? Because wxWidgets was just lacking in many areas. I know wxWidgets is designed to be used with native controls, and that's great, but wxWidgets just is not a feature-complete toolkit for multiplatform applications. It lacks in dialog editors, its code is archaic and outdated, and I just feel frustrated every time I try to do things with it. Qt on the other hand.. I had to actually try Qt to realize how much better it was as a toolkit. They've got everything from dialog editors, to an IDE, a debugger, build tools, just everything, and it's all top-notch and highly maintained. The focus of the toolkit is application development, and they spend their time trying to help people do exactly that: make programs. Great support, great tools, and because of that, great toolkit. I just didn't want to alienate any developers by being stubborn about native widgets. There *are* some things that are rather lackluster about it and design choices I disagree with though. For example, I realize that to have an easy to use toolkit you have to have some level of code generation. However, in my personal and humble opinion, moc just feels like a terrible way to approach the problem. Even now I feel like there are a variety of ways you could handle code generation and automatic management of things like that. I don't like the idea of circumventing the language itself like that. It feels like one giant massive hack. -------------------------------------------------- Things that aren't working properly: -------------------------------------------------- - Settings dialog is not implemented. The dialog is complete but the code to handle the dialog hasn't been constructed yet. - There is a problem with using Qt widgets as a device target on windows, with at least OpenGL: if I have the preview widget automatically resize itself, it seems to cause some sort of video card failure that I don't understand. - Because of the above, resizing the preview widget has been disabled until I can figure out what's going on, so it's currently only a 32x32 area. - Direct3D doesn't seem to render correctly either, seems that the viewport is messed up or something. I'm sort of confused about what's going on with it. - The new main window seems to be triggering more race conditions than the wxWidgets main window dialog did. I'm not entirely sure what's going on here, but this may just be existing race conditions within libobs itself that I just never spotted before (even though I tend to be very thorough with race conditions any time I use variables cross-thread)
2014-01-23 18:53:55 +00:00
bool accepted = NameDialog::AskForName(this,
QTStr("MainWindow.AddSceneDlg.Title"),
QTStr("MainWindow.AddSceneDlg.Text"),
name);
Change the UI to Qt (work in progress) -------------------------------------------------- Notes and details -------------------------------------------------- Why was this done? Because wxWidgets was just lacking in many areas. I know wxWidgets is designed to be used with native controls, and that's great, but wxWidgets just is not a feature-complete toolkit for multiplatform applications. It lacks in dialog editors, its code is archaic and outdated, and I just feel frustrated every time I try to do things with it. Qt on the other hand.. I had to actually try Qt to realize how much better it was as a toolkit. They've got everything from dialog editors, to an IDE, a debugger, build tools, just everything, and it's all top-notch and highly maintained. The focus of the toolkit is application development, and they spend their time trying to help people do exactly that: make programs. Great support, great tools, and because of that, great toolkit. I just didn't want to alienate any developers by being stubborn about native widgets. There *are* some things that are rather lackluster about it and design choices I disagree with though. For example, I realize that to have an easy to use toolkit you have to have some level of code generation. However, in my personal and humble opinion, moc just feels like a terrible way to approach the problem. Even now I feel like there are a variety of ways you could handle code generation and automatic management of things like that. I don't like the idea of circumventing the language itself like that. It feels like one giant massive hack. -------------------------------------------------- Things that aren't working properly: -------------------------------------------------- - Settings dialog is not implemented. The dialog is complete but the code to handle the dialog hasn't been constructed yet. - There is a problem with using Qt widgets as a device target on windows, with at least OpenGL: if I have the preview widget automatically resize itself, it seems to cause some sort of video card failure that I don't understand. - Because of the above, resizing the preview widget has been disabled until I can figure out what's going on, so it's currently only a 32x32 area. - Direct3D doesn't seem to render correctly either, seems that the viewport is messed up or something. I'm sort of confused about what's going on with it. - The new main window seems to be triggering more race conditions than the wxWidgets main window dialog did. I'm not entirely sure what's going on here, but this may just be existing race conditions within libobs itself that I just never spotted before (even though I tend to be very thorough with race conditions any time I use variables cross-thread)
2014-01-23 18:53:55 +00:00
if (accepted) {
if (name.empty()) {
QMessageBox::information(this,
QTStr("MainWindow.NoNameEntered"),
QTStr("MainWindow.NoNameEntered"));
on_actionAddScene_triggered();
return;
}
obs_source_t source = obs_get_source_by_name(name.c_str());
if (source) {
Change the UI to Qt (work in progress) -------------------------------------------------- Notes and details -------------------------------------------------- Why was this done? Because wxWidgets was just lacking in many areas. I know wxWidgets is designed to be used with native controls, and that's great, but wxWidgets just is not a feature-complete toolkit for multiplatform applications. It lacks in dialog editors, its code is archaic and outdated, and I just feel frustrated every time I try to do things with it. Qt on the other hand.. I had to actually try Qt to realize how much better it was as a toolkit. They've got everything from dialog editors, to an IDE, a debugger, build tools, just everything, and it's all top-notch and highly maintained. The focus of the toolkit is application development, and they spend their time trying to help people do exactly that: make programs. Great support, great tools, and because of that, great toolkit. I just didn't want to alienate any developers by being stubborn about native widgets. There *are* some things that are rather lackluster about it and design choices I disagree with though. For example, I realize that to have an easy to use toolkit you have to have some level of code generation. However, in my personal and humble opinion, moc just feels like a terrible way to approach the problem. Even now I feel like there are a variety of ways you could handle code generation and automatic management of things like that. I don't like the idea of circumventing the language itself like that. It feels like one giant massive hack. -------------------------------------------------- Things that aren't working properly: -------------------------------------------------- - Settings dialog is not implemented. The dialog is complete but the code to handle the dialog hasn't been constructed yet. - There is a problem with using Qt widgets as a device target on windows, with at least OpenGL: if I have the preview widget automatically resize itself, it seems to cause some sort of video card failure that I don't understand. - Because of the above, resizing the preview widget has been disabled until I can figure out what's going on, so it's currently only a 32x32 area. - Direct3D doesn't seem to render correctly either, seems that the viewport is messed up or something. I'm sort of confused about what's going on with it. - The new main window seems to be triggering more race conditions than the wxWidgets main window dialog did. I'm not entirely sure what's going on here, but this may just be existing race conditions within libobs itself that I just never spotted before (even though I tend to be very thorough with race conditions any time I use variables cross-thread)
2014-01-23 18:53:55 +00:00
QMessageBox::information(this,
QTStr("MainWindow.NameExists.Title"),
QTStr("MainWindow.NameExists.Text"));
obs_source_release(source);
Change the UI to Qt (work in progress) -------------------------------------------------- Notes and details -------------------------------------------------- Why was this done? Because wxWidgets was just lacking in many areas. I know wxWidgets is designed to be used with native controls, and that's great, but wxWidgets just is not a feature-complete toolkit for multiplatform applications. It lacks in dialog editors, its code is archaic and outdated, and I just feel frustrated every time I try to do things with it. Qt on the other hand.. I had to actually try Qt to realize how much better it was as a toolkit. They've got everything from dialog editors, to an IDE, a debugger, build tools, just everything, and it's all top-notch and highly maintained. The focus of the toolkit is application development, and they spend their time trying to help people do exactly that: make programs. Great support, great tools, and because of that, great toolkit. I just didn't want to alienate any developers by being stubborn about native widgets. There *are* some things that are rather lackluster about it and design choices I disagree with though. For example, I realize that to have an easy to use toolkit you have to have some level of code generation. However, in my personal and humble opinion, moc just feels like a terrible way to approach the problem. Even now I feel like there are a variety of ways you could handle code generation and automatic management of things like that. I don't like the idea of circumventing the language itself like that. It feels like one giant massive hack. -------------------------------------------------- Things that aren't working properly: -------------------------------------------------- - Settings dialog is not implemented. The dialog is complete but the code to handle the dialog hasn't been constructed yet. - There is a problem with using Qt widgets as a device target on windows, with at least OpenGL: if I have the preview widget automatically resize itself, it seems to cause some sort of video card failure that I don't understand. - Because of the above, resizing the preview widget has been disabled until I can figure out what's going on, so it's currently only a 32x32 area. - Direct3D doesn't seem to render correctly either, seems that the viewport is messed up or something. I'm sort of confused about what's going on with it. - The new main window seems to be triggering more race conditions than the wxWidgets main window dialog did. I'm not entirely sure what's going on here, but this may just be existing race conditions within libobs itself that I just never spotted before (even though I tend to be very thorough with race conditions any time I use variables cross-thread)
2014-01-23 18:53:55 +00:00
on_actionAddScene_triggered();
return;
}
obs_scene_t scene = obs_scene_create(name.c_str());
source = obs_scene_getsource(scene);
obs_add_source(source);
obs_scene_release(scene);
obs_set_output_source(0, source);
}
}
Change the UI to Qt (work in progress) -------------------------------------------------- Notes and details -------------------------------------------------- Why was this done? Because wxWidgets was just lacking in many areas. I know wxWidgets is designed to be used with native controls, and that's great, but wxWidgets just is not a feature-complete toolkit for multiplatform applications. It lacks in dialog editors, its code is archaic and outdated, and I just feel frustrated every time I try to do things with it. Qt on the other hand.. I had to actually try Qt to realize how much better it was as a toolkit. They've got everything from dialog editors, to an IDE, a debugger, build tools, just everything, and it's all top-notch and highly maintained. The focus of the toolkit is application development, and they spend their time trying to help people do exactly that: make programs. Great support, great tools, and because of that, great toolkit. I just didn't want to alienate any developers by being stubborn about native widgets. There *are* some things that are rather lackluster about it and design choices I disagree with though. For example, I realize that to have an easy to use toolkit you have to have some level of code generation. However, in my personal and humble opinion, moc just feels like a terrible way to approach the problem. Even now I feel like there are a variety of ways you could handle code generation and automatic management of things like that. I don't like the idea of circumventing the language itself like that. It feels like one giant massive hack. -------------------------------------------------- Things that aren't working properly: -------------------------------------------------- - Settings dialog is not implemented. The dialog is complete but the code to handle the dialog hasn't been constructed yet. - There is a problem with using Qt widgets as a device target on windows, with at least OpenGL: if I have the preview widget automatically resize itself, it seems to cause some sort of video card failure that I don't understand. - Because of the above, resizing the preview widget has been disabled until I can figure out what's going on, so it's currently only a 32x32 area. - Direct3D doesn't seem to render correctly either, seems that the viewport is messed up or something. I'm sort of confused about what's going on with it. - The new main window seems to be triggering more race conditions than the wxWidgets main window dialog did. I'm not entirely sure what's going on here, but this may just be existing race conditions within libobs itself that I just never spotted before (even though I tend to be very thorough with race conditions any time I use variables cross-thread)
2014-01-23 18:53:55 +00:00
void OBSBasic::on_actionRemoveScene_triggered()
{
Change the UI to Qt (work in progress) -------------------------------------------------- Notes and details -------------------------------------------------- Why was this done? Because wxWidgets was just lacking in many areas. I know wxWidgets is designed to be used with native controls, and that's great, but wxWidgets just is not a feature-complete toolkit for multiplatform applications. It lacks in dialog editors, its code is archaic and outdated, and I just feel frustrated every time I try to do things with it. Qt on the other hand.. I had to actually try Qt to realize how much better it was as a toolkit. They've got everything from dialog editors, to an IDE, a debugger, build tools, just everything, and it's all top-notch and highly maintained. The focus of the toolkit is application development, and they spend their time trying to help people do exactly that: make programs. Great support, great tools, and because of that, great toolkit. I just didn't want to alienate any developers by being stubborn about native widgets. There *are* some things that are rather lackluster about it and design choices I disagree with though. For example, I realize that to have an easy to use toolkit you have to have some level of code generation. However, in my personal and humble opinion, moc just feels like a terrible way to approach the problem. Even now I feel like there are a variety of ways you could handle code generation and automatic management of things like that. I don't like the idea of circumventing the language itself like that. It feels like one giant massive hack. -------------------------------------------------- Things that aren't working properly: -------------------------------------------------- - Settings dialog is not implemented. The dialog is complete but the code to handle the dialog hasn't been constructed yet. - There is a problem with using Qt widgets as a device target on windows, with at least OpenGL: if I have the preview widget automatically resize itself, it seems to cause some sort of video card failure that I don't understand. - Because of the above, resizing the preview widget has been disabled until I can figure out what's going on, so it's currently only a 32x32 area. - Direct3D doesn't seem to render correctly either, seems that the viewport is messed up or something. I'm sort of confused about what's going on with it. - The new main window seems to be triggering more race conditions than the wxWidgets main window dialog did. I'm not entirely sure what's going on here, but this may just be existing race conditions within libobs itself that I just never spotted before (even though I tend to be very thorough with race conditions any time I use variables cross-thread)
2014-01-23 18:53:55 +00:00
QListWidgetItem *item = ui->scenes->currentItem();
if (!item)
2013-12-30 03:01:19 +00:00
return;
Change the UI to Qt (work in progress) -------------------------------------------------- Notes and details -------------------------------------------------- Why was this done? Because wxWidgets was just lacking in many areas. I know wxWidgets is designed to be used with native controls, and that's great, but wxWidgets just is not a feature-complete toolkit for multiplatform applications. It lacks in dialog editors, its code is archaic and outdated, and I just feel frustrated every time I try to do things with it. Qt on the other hand.. I had to actually try Qt to realize how much better it was as a toolkit. They've got everything from dialog editors, to an IDE, a debugger, build tools, just everything, and it's all top-notch and highly maintained. The focus of the toolkit is application development, and they spend their time trying to help people do exactly that: make programs. Great support, great tools, and because of that, great toolkit. I just didn't want to alienate any developers by being stubborn about native widgets. There *are* some things that are rather lackluster about it and design choices I disagree with though. For example, I realize that to have an easy to use toolkit you have to have some level of code generation. However, in my personal and humble opinion, moc just feels like a terrible way to approach the problem. Even now I feel like there are a variety of ways you could handle code generation and automatic management of things like that. I don't like the idea of circumventing the language itself like that. It feels like one giant massive hack. -------------------------------------------------- Things that aren't working properly: -------------------------------------------------- - Settings dialog is not implemented. The dialog is complete but the code to handle the dialog hasn't been constructed yet. - There is a problem with using Qt widgets as a device target on windows, with at least OpenGL: if I have the preview widget automatically resize itself, it seems to cause some sort of video card failure that I don't understand. - Because of the above, resizing the preview widget has been disabled until I can figure out what's going on, so it's currently only a 32x32 area. - Direct3D doesn't seem to render correctly either, seems that the viewport is messed up or something. I'm sort of confused about what's going on with it. - The new main window seems to be triggering more race conditions than the wxWidgets main window dialog did. I'm not entirely sure what's going on here, but this may just be existing race conditions within libobs itself that I just never spotted before (even though I tend to be very thorough with race conditions any time I use variables cross-thread)
2014-01-23 18:53:55 +00:00
QVariant userData = item->data(Qt::UserRole);
obs_scene_t scene = userData.value<OBSScene>();
2013-12-30 03:01:19 +00:00
obs_source_t source = obs_scene_getsource(scene);
obs_source_remove(source);
}
Change the UI to Qt (work in progress) -------------------------------------------------- Notes and details -------------------------------------------------- Why was this done? Because wxWidgets was just lacking in many areas. I know wxWidgets is designed to be used with native controls, and that's great, but wxWidgets just is not a feature-complete toolkit for multiplatform applications. It lacks in dialog editors, its code is archaic and outdated, and I just feel frustrated every time I try to do things with it. Qt on the other hand.. I had to actually try Qt to realize how much better it was as a toolkit. They've got everything from dialog editors, to an IDE, a debugger, build tools, just everything, and it's all top-notch and highly maintained. The focus of the toolkit is application development, and they spend their time trying to help people do exactly that: make programs. Great support, great tools, and because of that, great toolkit. I just didn't want to alienate any developers by being stubborn about native widgets. There *are* some things that are rather lackluster about it and design choices I disagree with though. For example, I realize that to have an easy to use toolkit you have to have some level of code generation. However, in my personal and humble opinion, moc just feels like a terrible way to approach the problem. Even now I feel like there are a variety of ways you could handle code generation and automatic management of things like that. I don't like the idea of circumventing the language itself like that. It feels like one giant massive hack. -------------------------------------------------- Things that aren't working properly: -------------------------------------------------- - Settings dialog is not implemented. The dialog is complete but the code to handle the dialog hasn't been constructed yet. - There is a problem with using Qt widgets as a device target on windows, with at least OpenGL: if I have the preview widget automatically resize itself, it seems to cause some sort of video card failure that I don't understand. - Because of the above, resizing the preview widget has been disabled until I can figure out what's going on, so it's currently only a 32x32 area. - Direct3D doesn't seem to render correctly either, seems that the viewport is messed up or something. I'm sort of confused about what's going on with it. - The new main window seems to be triggering more race conditions than the wxWidgets main window dialog did. I'm not entirely sure what's going on here, but this may just be existing race conditions within libobs itself that I just never spotted before (even though I tend to be very thorough with race conditions any time I use variables cross-thread)
2014-01-23 18:53:55 +00:00
void OBSBasic::on_actionSceneProperties_triggered()
{
/* TODO */
}
Change the UI to Qt (work in progress) -------------------------------------------------- Notes and details -------------------------------------------------- Why was this done? Because wxWidgets was just lacking in many areas. I know wxWidgets is designed to be used with native controls, and that's great, but wxWidgets just is not a feature-complete toolkit for multiplatform applications. It lacks in dialog editors, its code is archaic and outdated, and I just feel frustrated every time I try to do things with it. Qt on the other hand.. I had to actually try Qt to realize how much better it was as a toolkit. They've got everything from dialog editors, to an IDE, a debugger, build tools, just everything, and it's all top-notch and highly maintained. The focus of the toolkit is application development, and they spend their time trying to help people do exactly that: make programs. Great support, great tools, and because of that, great toolkit. I just didn't want to alienate any developers by being stubborn about native widgets. There *are* some things that are rather lackluster about it and design choices I disagree with though. For example, I realize that to have an easy to use toolkit you have to have some level of code generation. However, in my personal and humble opinion, moc just feels like a terrible way to approach the problem. Even now I feel like there are a variety of ways you could handle code generation and automatic management of things like that. I don't like the idea of circumventing the language itself like that. It feels like one giant massive hack. -------------------------------------------------- Things that aren't working properly: -------------------------------------------------- - Settings dialog is not implemented. The dialog is complete but the code to handle the dialog hasn't been constructed yet. - There is a problem with using Qt widgets as a device target on windows, with at least OpenGL: if I have the preview widget automatically resize itself, it seems to cause some sort of video card failure that I don't understand. - Because of the above, resizing the preview widget has been disabled until I can figure out what's going on, so it's currently only a 32x32 area. - Direct3D doesn't seem to render correctly either, seems that the viewport is messed up or something. I'm sort of confused about what's going on with it. - The new main window seems to be triggering more race conditions than the wxWidgets main window dialog did. I'm not entirely sure what's going on here, but this may just be existing race conditions within libobs itself that I just never spotted before (even though I tend to be very thorough with race conditions any time I use variables cross-thread)
2014-01-23 18:53:55 +00:00
void OBSBasic::on_actionSceneUp_triggered()
{
/* TODO */
}
Change the UI to Qt (work in progress) -------------------------------------------------- Notes and details -------------------------------------------------- Why was this done? Because wxWidgets was just lacking in many areas. I know wxWidgets is designed to be used with native controls, and that's great, but wxWidgets just is not a feature-complete toolkit for multiplatform applications. It lacks in dialog editors, its code is archaic and outdated, and I just feel frustrated every time I try to do things with it. Qt on the other hand.. I had to actually try Qt to realize how much better it was as a toolkit. They've got everything from dialog editors, to an IDE, a debugger, build tools, just everything, and it's all top-notch and highly maintained. The focus of the toolkit is application development, and they spend their time trying to help people do exactly that: make programs. Great support, great tools, and because of that, great toolkit. I just didn't want to alienate any developers by being stubborn about native widgets. There *are* some things that are rather lackluster about it and design choices I disagree with though. For example, I realize that to have an easy to use toolkit you have to have some level of code generation. However, in my personal and humble opinion, moc just feels like a terrible way to approach the problem. Even now I feel like there are a variety of ways you could handle code generation and automatic management of things like that. I don't like the idea of circumventing the language itself like that. It feels like one giant massive hack. -------------------------------------------------- Things that aren't working properly: -------------------------------------------------- - Settings dialog is not implemented. The dialog is complete but the code to handle the dialog hasn't been constructed yet. - There is a problem with using Qt widgets as a device target on windows, with at least OpenGL: if I have the preview widget automatically resize itself, it seems to cause some sort of video card failure that I don't understand. - Because of the above, resizing the preview widget has been disabled until I can figure out what's going on, so it's currently only a 32x32 area. - Direct3D doesn't seem to render correctly either, seems that the viewport is messed up or something. I'm sort of confused about what's going on with it. - The new main window seems to be triggering more race conditions than the wxWidgets main window dialog did. I'm not entirely sure what's going on here, but this may just be existing race conditions within libobs itself that I just never spotted before (even though I tend to be very thorough with race conditions any time I use variables cross-thread)
2014-01-23 18:53:55 +00:00
void OBSBasic::on_actionSceneDown_triggered()
{
/* TODO */
}
void OBSBasic::on_sources_currentItemChanged(QListWidgetItem *current,
QListWidgetItem *prev)
{
/* TODO */
UNUSED_PARAMETER(current);
UNUSED_PARAMETER(prev);
}
Change the UI to Qt (work in progress) -------------------------------------------------- Notes and details -------------------------------------------------- Why was this done? Because wxWidgets was just lacking in many areas. I know wxWidgets is designed to be used with native controls, and that's great, but wxWidgets just is not a feature-complete toolkit for multiplatform applications. It lacks in dialog editors, its code is archaic and outdated, and I just feel frustrated every time I try to do things with it. Qt on the other hand.. I had to actually try Qt to realize how much better it was as a toolkit. They've got everything from dialog editors, to an IDE, a debugger, build tools, just everything, and it's all top-notch and highly maintained. The focus of the toolkit is application development, and they spend their time trying to help people do exactly that: make programs. Great support, great tools, and because of that, great toolkit. I just didn't want to alienate any developers by being stubborn about native widgets. There *are* some things that are rather lackluster about it and design choices I disagree with though. For example, I realize that to have an easy to use toolkit you have to have some level of code generation. However, in my personal and humble opinion, moc just feels like a terrible way to approach the problem. Even now I feel like there are a variety of ways you could handle code generation and automatic management of things like that. I don't like the idea of circumventing the language itself like that. It feels like one giant massive hack. -------------------------------------------------- Things that aren't working properly: -------------------------------------------------- - Settings dialog is not implemented. The dialog is complete but the code to handle the dialog hasn't been constructed yet. - There is a problem with using Qt widgets as a device target on windows, with at least OpenGL: if I have the preview widget automatically resize itself, it seems to cause some sort of video card failure that I don't understand. - Because of the above, resizing the preview widget has been disabled until I can figure out what's going on, so it's currently only a 32x32 area. - Direct3D doesn't seem to render correctly either, seems that the viewport is messed up or something. I'm sort of confused about what's going on with it. - The new main window seems to be triggering more race conditions than the wxWidgets main window dialog did. I'm not entirely sure what's going on here, but this may just be existing race conditions within libobs itself that I just never spotted before (even though I tend to be very thorough with race conditions any time I use variables cross-thread)
2014-01-23 18:53:55 +00:00
void OBSBasic::on_sources_customContextMenuRequested(const QPoint &pos)
{
/* TODO */
UNUSED_PARAMETER(pos);
}
void OBSBasic::AddSource(obs_scene_t scene, const char *id)
{
string name;
bool success = false;
while (!success) {
Change the UI to Qt (work in progress) -------------------------------------------------- Notes and details -------------------------------------------------- Why was this done? Because wxWidgets was just lacking in many areas. I know wxWidgets is designed to be used with native controls, and that's great, but wxWidgets just is not a feature-complete toolkit for multiplatform applications. It lacks in dialog editors, its code is archaic and outdated, and I just feel frustrated every time I try to do things with it. Qt on the other hand.. I had to actually try Qt to realize how much better it was as a toolkit. They've got everything from dialog editors, to an IDE, a debugger, build tools, just everything, and it's all top-notch and highly maintained. The focus of the toolkit is application development, and they spend their time trying to help people do exactly that: make programs. Great support, great tools, and because of that, great toolkit. I just didn't want to alienate any developers by being stubborn about native widgets. There *are* some things that are rather lackluster about it and design choices I disagree with though. For example, I realize that to have an easy to use toolkit you have to have some level of code generation. However, in my personal and humble opinion, moc just feels like a terrible way to approach the problem. Even now I feel like there are a variety of ways you could handle code generation and automatic management of things like that. I don't like the idea of circumventing the language itself like that. It feels like one giant massive hack. -------------------------------------------------- Things that aren't working properly: -------------------------------------------------- - Settings dialog is not implemented. The dialog is complete but the code to handle the dialog hasn't been constructed yet. - There is a problem with using Qt widgets as a device target on windows, with at least OpenGL: if I have the preview widget automatically resize itself, it seems to cause some sort of video card failure that I don't understand. - Because of the above, resizing the preview widget has been disabled until I can figure out what's going on, so it's currently only a 32x32 area. - Direct3D doesn't seem to render correctly either, seems that the viewport is messed up or something. I'm sort of confused about what's going on with it. - The new main window seems to be triggering more race conditions than the wxWidgets main window dialog did. I'm not entirely sure what's going on here, but this may just be existing race conditions within libobs itself that I just never spotted before (even though I tend to be very thorough with race conditions any time I use variables cross-thread)
2014-01-23 18:53:55 +00:00
bool accepted = NameDialog::AskForName(this,
Str("MainWindow.AddSourceDlg.Title"),
Str("MainWindow.AddSourceDlg.Text"),
name);
Change the UI to Qt (work in progress) -------------------------------------------------- Notes and details -------------------------------------------------- Why was this done? Because wxWidgets was just lacking in many areas. I know wxWidgets is designed to be used with native controls, and that's great, but wxWidgets just is not a feature-complete toolkit for multiplatform applications. It lacks in dialog editors, its code is archaic and outdated, and I just feel frustrated every time I try to do things with it. Qt on the other hand.. I had to actually try Qt to realize how much better it was as a toolkit. They've got everything from dialog editors, to an IDE, a debugger, build tools, just everything, and it's all top-notch and highly maintained. The focus of the toolkit is application development, and they spend their time trying to help people do exactly that: make programs. Great support, great tools, and because of that, great toolkit. I just didn't want to alienate any developers by being stubborn about native widgets. There *are* some things that are rather lackluster about it and design choices I disagree with though. For example, I realize that to have an easy to use toolkit you have to have some level of code generation. However, in my personal and humble opinion, moc just feels like a terrible way to approach the problem. Even now I feel like there are a variety of ways you could handle code generation and automatic management of things like that. I don't like the idea of circumventing the language itself like that. It feels like one giant massive hack. -------------------------------------------------- Things that aren't working properly: -------------------------------------------------- - Settings dialog is not implemented. The dialog is complete but the code to handle the dialog hasn't been constructed yet. - There is a problem with using Qt widgets as a device target on windows, with at least OpenGL: if I have the preview widget automatically resize itself, it seems to cause some sort of video card failure that I don't understand. - Because of the above, resizing the preview widget has been disabled until I can figure out what's going on, so it's currently only a 32x32 area. - Direct3D doesn't seem to render correctly either, seems that the viewport is messed up or something. I'm sort of confused about what's going on with it. - The new main window seems to be triggering more race conditions than the wxWidgets main window dialog did. I'm not entirely sure what's going on here, but this may just be existing race conditions within libobs itself that I just never spotted before (even though I tend to be very thorough with race conditions any time I use variables cross-thread)
2014-01-23 18:53:55 +00:00
if (!accepted)
break;
if (name.empty()) {
QMessageBox::information(this,
QTStr("MainWindow.NoNameEntered"),
QTStr("MainWindow.NoNameEntered"));
continue;
}
Change the UI to Qt (work in progress) -------------------------------------------------- Notes and details -------------------------------------------------- Why was this done? Because wxWidgets was just lacking in many areas. I know wxWidgets is designed to be used with native controls, and that's great, but wxWidgets just is not a feature-complete toolkit for multiplatform applications. It lacks in dialog editors, its code is archaic and outdated, and I just feel frustrated every time I try to do things with it. Qt on the other hand.. I had to actually try Qt to realize how much better it was as a toolkit. They've got everything from dialog editors, to an IDE, a debugger, build tools, just everything, and it's all top-notch and highly maintained. The focus of the toolkit is application development, and they spend their time trying to help people do exactly that: make programs. Great support, great tools, and because of that, great toolkit. I just didn't want to alienate any developers by being stubborn about native widgets. There *are* some things that are rather lackluster about it and design choices I disagree with though. For example, I realize that to have an easy to use toolkit you have to have some level of code generation. However, in my personal and humble opinion, moc just feels like a terrible way to approach the problem. Even now I feel like there are a variety of ways you could handle code generation and automatic management of things like that. I don't like the idea of circumventing the language itself like that. It feels like one giant massive hack. -------------------------------------------------- Things that aren't working properly: -------------------------------------------------- - Settings dialog is not implemented. The dialog is complete but the code to handle the dialog hasn't been constructed yet. - There is a problem with using Qt widgets as a device target on windows, with at least OpenGL: if I have the preview widget automatically resize itself, it seems to cause some sort of video card failure that I don't understand. - Because of the above, resizing the preview widget has been disabled until I can figure out what's going on, so it's currently only a 32x32 area. - Direct3D doesn't seem to render correctly either, seems that the viewport is messed up or something. I'm sort of confused about what's going on with it. - The new main window seems to be triggering more race conditions than the wxWidgets main window dialog did. I'm not entirely sure what's going on here, but this may just be existing race conditions within libobs itself that I just never spotted before (even though I tend to be very thorough with race conditions any time I use variables cross-thread)
2014-01-23 18:53:55 +00:00
obs_source_t source = obs_get_source_by_name(name.c_str());
if (!source) {
success = true;
break;
} else {
Change the UI to Qt (work in progress) -------------------------------------------------- Notes and details -------------------------------------------------- Why was this done? Because wxWidgets was just lacking in many areas. I know wxWidgets is designed to be used with native controls, and that's great, but wxWidgets just is not a feature-complete toolkit for multiplatform applications. It lacks in dialog editors, its code is archaic and outdated, and I just feel frustrated every time I try to do things with it. Qt on the other hand.. I had to actually try Qt to realize how much better it was as a toolkit. They've got everything from dialog editors, to an IDE, a debugger, build tools, just everything, and it's all top-notch and highly maintained. The focus of the toolkit is application development, and they spend their time trying to help people do exactly that: make programs. Great support, great tools, and because of that, great toolkit. I just didn't want to alienate any developers by being stubborn about native widgets. There *are* some things that are rather lackluster about it and design choices I disagree with though. For example, I realize that to have an easy to use toolkit you have to have some level of code generation. However, in my personal and humble opinion, moc just feels like a terrible way to approach the problem. Even now I feel like there are a variety of ways you could handle code generation and automatic management of things like that. I don't like the idea of circumventing the language itself like that. It feels like one giant massive hack. -------------------------------------------------- Things that aren't working properly: -------------------------------------------------- - Settings dialog is not implemented. The dialog is complete but the code to handle the dialog hasn't been constructed yet. - There is a problem with using Qt widgets as a device target on windows, with at least OpenGL: if I have the preview widget automatically resize itself, it seems to cause some sort of video card failure that I don't understand. - Because of the above, resizing the preview widget has been disabled until I can figure out what's going on, so it's currently only a 32x32 area. - Direct3D doesn't seem to render correctly either, seems that the viewport is messed up or something. I'm sort of confused about what's going on with it. - The new main window seems to be triggering more race conditions than the wxWidgets main window dialog did. I'm not entirely sure what's going on here, but this may just be existing race conditions within libobs itself that I just never spotted before (even though I tend to be very thorough with race conditions any time I use variables cross-thread)
2014-01-23 18:53:55 +00:00
QMessageBox::information(this,
QTStr("MainWindow.NameExists.Title"),
QTStr("MainWindow.NameExists.Text"));
obs_source_release(source);
}
}
if (success) {
Revamp API and start using doxygen The API used to be designed in such a way to where it would expect exports for each individual source/output/encoder/etc. You would export functions for each and it would automatically load those functions based on a specific naming scheme from the module. The idea behind this was that I wanted to limit the usage of structures in the API so only functions could be used. It was an interesting idea in theory, but this idea turned out to be flawed in a number of ways: 1.) Requiring exports to create sources/outputs/encoders/etc meant that you could not create them by any other means, which meant that things like faruton's .net plugin would become difficult. 2.) Export function declarations could not be checked, therefore if you created a function with the wrong parameters and parameter types, the compiler wouldn't know how to check for that. 3.) Required overly complex load functions in libobs just to handle it. It makes much more sense to just have a load function that you call manually. Complexity is the bane of all good programs. 4.) It required that you have functions of specific names, which looked and felt somewhat unsightly. So, to fix these issues, I replaced it with a more commonly used API scheme, seen commonly in places like kernels and typical C libraries with abstraction. You simply create a structure that contains the callback definitions, and you pass it to a function to register that definition (such as obs_register_source), which you call in the obs_module_load of the module. It will also automatically check the structure size and ensure that it only loads the required values if the structure happened to add new values in an API change. The "main" source file for each module must include obs-module.h, and must use OBS_DECLARE_MODULE() within that source file. Also, started writing some doxygen documentation in to the main library headers. Will add more detailed documentation as I go.
2014-02-12 15:04:50 +00:00
obs_source_t source = obs_source_create(OBS_SOURCE_TYPE_INPUT,
id, name.c_str(), NULL);
sourceSceneRefs[source] = 0;
obs_add_source(source);
obs_scene_add(scene, source);
obs_source_release(source);
}
}
Change the UI to Qt (work in progress) -------------------------------------------------- Notes and details -------------------------------------------------- Why was this done? Because wxWidgets was just lacking in many areas. I know wxWidgets is designed to be used with native controls, and that's great, but wxWidgets just is not a feature-complete toolkit for multiplatform applications. It lacks in dialog editors, its code is archaic and outdated, and I just feel frustrated every time I try to do things with it. Qt on the other hand.. I had to actually try Qt to realize how much better it was as a toolkit. They've got everything from dialog editors, to an IDE, a debugger, build tools, just everything, and it's all top-notch and highly maintained. The focus of the toolkit is application development, and they spend their time trying to help people do exactly that: make programs. Great support, great tools, and because of that, great toolkit. I just didn't want to alienate any developers by being stubborn about native widgets. There *are* some things that are rather lackluster about it and design choices I disagree with though. For example, I realize that to have an easy to use toolkit you have to have some level of code generation. However, in my personal and humble opinion, moc just feels like a terrible way to approach the problem. Even now I feel like there are a variety of ways you could handle code generation and automatic management of things like that. I don't like the idea of circumventing the language itself like that. It feels like one giant massive hack. -------------------------------------------------- Things that aren't working properly: -------------------------------------------------- - Settings dialog is not implemented. The dialog is complete but the code to handle the dialog hasn't been constructed yet. - There is a problem with using Qt widgets as a device target on windows, with at least OpenGL: if I have the preview widget automatically resize itself, it seems to cause some sort of video card failure that I don't understand. - Because of the above, resizing the preview widget has been disabled until I can figure out what's going on, so it's currently only a 32x32 area. - Direct3D doesn't seem to render correctly either, seems that the viewport is messed up or something. I'm sort of confused about what's going on with it. - The new main window seems to be triggering more race conditions than the wxWidgets main window dialog did. I'm not entirely sure what's going on here, but this may just be existing race conditions within libobs itself that I just never spotted before (even though I tend to be very thorough with race conditions any time I use variables cross-thread)
2014-01-23 18:53:55 +00:00
void OBSBasic::AddSourcePopupMenu(const QPoint &pos)
{
OBSScene scene = GetCurrentScene();
const char *type;
Change the UI to Qt (work in progress) -------------------------------------------------- Notes and details -------------------------------------------------- Why was this done? Because wxWidgets was just lacking in many areas. I know wxWidgets is designed to be used with native controls, and that's great, but wxWidgets just is not a feature-complete toolkit for multiplatform applications. It lacks in dialog editors, its code is archaic and outdated, and I just feel frustrated every time I try to do things with it. Qt on the other hand.. I had to actually try Qt to realize how much better it was as a toolkit. They've got everything from dialog editors, to an IDE, a debugger, build tools, just everything, and it's all top-notch and highly maintained. The focus of the toolkit is application development, and they spend their time trying to help people do exactly that: make programs. Great support, great tools, and because of that, great toolkit. I just didn't want to alienate any developers by being stubborn about native widgets. There *are* some things that are rather lackluster about it and design choices I disagree with though. For example, I realize that to have an easy to use toolkit you have to have some level of code generation. However, in my personal and humble opinion, moc just feels like a terrible way to approach the problem. Even now I feel like there are a variety of ways you could handle code generation and automatic management of things like that. I don't like the idea of circumventing the language itself like that. It feels like one giant massive hack. -------------------------------------------------- Things that aren't working properly: -------------------------------------------------- - Settings dialog is not implemented. The dialog is complete but the code to handle the dialog hasn't been constructed yet. - There is a problem with using Qt widgets as a device target on windows, with at least OpenGL: if I have the preview widget automatically resize itself, it seems to cause some sort of video card failure that I don't understand. - Because of the above, resizing the preview widget has been disabled until I can figure out what's going on, so it's currently only a 32x32 area. - Direct3D doesn't seem to render correctly either, seems that the viewport is messed up or something. I'm sort of confused about what's going on with it. - The new main window seems to be triggering more race conditions than the wxWidgets main window dialog did. I'm not entirely sure what's going on here, but this may just be existing race conditions within libobs itself that I just never spotted before (even though I tend to be very thorough with race conditions any time I use variables cross-thread)
2014-01-23 18:53:55 +00:00
bool foundValues = false;
size_t idx = 0;
if (!scene)
return;
Change the UI to Qt (work in progress) -------------------------------------------------- Notes and details -------------------------------------------------- Why was this done? Because wxWidgets was just lacking in many areas. I know wxWidgets is designed to be used with native controls, and that's great, but wxWidgets just is not a feature-complete toolkit for multiplatform applications. It lacks in dialog editors, its code is archaic and outdated, and I just feel frustrated every time I try to do things with it. Qt on the other hand.. I had to actually try Qt to realize how much better it was as a toolkit. They've got everything from dialog editors, to an IDE, a debugger, build tools, just everything, and it's all top-notch and highly maintained. The focus of the toolkit is application development, and they spend their time trying to help people do exactly that: make programs. Great support, great tools, and because of that, great toolkit. I just didn't want to alienate any developers by being stubborn about native widgets. There *are* some things that are rather lackluster about it and design choices I disagree with though. For example, I realize that to have an easy to use toolkit you have to have some level of code generation. However, in my personal and humble opinion, moc just feels like a terrible way to approach the problem. Even now I feel like there are a variety of ways you could handle code generation and automatic management of things like that. I don't like the idea of circumventing the language itself like that. It feels like one giant massive hack. -------------------------------------------------- Things that aren't working properly: -------------------------------------------------- - Settings dialog is not implemented. The dialog is complete but the code to handle the dialog hasn't been constructed yet. - There is a problem with using Qt widgets as a device target on windows, with at least OpenGL: if I have the preview widget automatically resize itself, it seems to cause some sort of video card failure that I don't understand. - Because of the above, resizing the preview widget has been disabled until I can figure out what's going on, so it's currently only a 32x32 area. - Direct3D doesn't seem to render correctly either, seems that the viewport is messed up or something. I'm sort of confused about what's going on with it. - The new main window seems to be triggering more race conditions than the wxWidgets main window dialog did. I'm not entirely sure what's going on here, but this may just be existing race conditions within libobs itself that I just never spotted before (even though I tend to be very thorough with race conditions any time I use variables cross-thread)
2014-01-23 18:53:55 +00:00
QMenu popup;
while (obs_enum_input_types(idx++, &type)) {
Revamp API and start using doxygen The API used to be designed in such a way to where it would expect exports for each individual source/output/encoder/etc. You would export functions for each and it would automatically load those functions based on a specific naming scheme from the module. The idea behind this was that I wanted to limit the usage of structures in the API so only functions could be used. It was an interesting idea in theory, but this idea turned out to be flawed in a number of ways: 1.) Requiring exports to create sources/outputs/encoders/etc meant that you could not create them by any other means, which meant that things like faruton's .net plugin would become difficult. 2.) Export function declarations could not be checked, therefore if you created a function with the wrong parameters and parameter types, the compiler wouldn't know how to check for that. 3.) Required overly complex load functions in libobs just to handle it. It makes much more sense to just have a load function that you call manually. Complexity is the bane of all good programs. 4.) It required that you have functions of specific names, which looked and felt somewhat unsightly. So, to fix these issues, I replaced it with a more commonly used API scheme, seen commonly in places like kernels and typical C libraries with abstraction. You simply create a structure that contains the callback definitions, and you pass it to a function to register that definition (such as obs_register_source), which you call in the obs_module_load of the module. It will also automatically check the structure size and ensure that it only loads the required values if the structure happened to add new values in an API change. The "main" source file for each module must include obs-module.h, and must use OBS_DECLARE_MODULE() within that source file. Also, started writing some doxygen documentation in to the main library headers. Will add more detailed documentation as I go.
2014-02-12 15:04:50 +00:00
const char *name = obs_source_getdisplayname(
OBS_SOURCE_TYPE_INPUT,
Change the UI to Qt (work in progress) -------------------------------------------------- Notes and details -------------------------------------------------- Why was this done? Because wxWidgets was just lacking in many areas. I know wxWidgets is designed to be used with native controls, and that's great, but wxWidgets just is not a feature-complete toolkit for multiplatform applications. It lacks in dialog editors, its code is archaic and outdated, and I just feel frustrated every time I try to do things with it. Qt on the other hand.. I had to actually try Qt to realize how much better it was as a toolkit. They've got everything from dialog editors, to an IDE, a debugger, build tools, just everything, and it's all top-notch and highly maintained. The focus of the toolkit is application development, and they spend their time trying to help people do exactly that: make programs. Great support, great tools, and because of that, great toolkit. I just didn't want to alienate any developers by being stubborn about native widgets. There *are* some things that are rather lackluster about it and design choices I disagree with though. For example, I realize that to have an easy to use toolkit you have to have some level of code generation. However, in my personal and humble opinion, moc just feels like a terrible way to approach the problem. Even now I feel like there are a variety of ways you could handle code generation and automatic management of things like that. I don't like the idea of circumventing the language itself like that. It feels like one giant massive hack. -------------------------------------------------- Things that aren't working properly: -------------------------------------------------- - Settings dialog is not implemented. The dialog is complete but the code to handle the dialog hasn't been constructed yet. - There is a problem with using Qt widgets as a device target on windows, with at least OpenGL: if I have the preview widget automatically resize itself, it seems to cause some sort of video card failure that I don't understand. - Because of the above, resizing the preview widget has been disabled until I can figure out what's going on, so it's currently only a 32x32 area. - Direct3D doesn't seem to render correctly either, seems that the viewport is messed up or something. I'm sort of confused about what's going on with it. - The new main window seems to be triggering more race conditions than the wxWidgets main window dialog did. I'm not entirely sure what's going on here, but this may just be existing race conditions within libobs itself that I just never spotted before (even though I tend to be very thorough with race conditions any time I use variables cross-thread)
2014-01-23 18:53:55 +00:00
type, App()->GetLocale());
Change the UI to Qt (work in progress) -------------------------------------------------- Notes and details -------------------------------------------------- Why was this done? Because wxWidgets was just lacking in many areas. I know wxWidgets is designed to be used with native controls, and that's great, but wxWidgets just is not a feature-complete toolkit for multiplatform applications. It lacks in dialog editors, its code is archaic and outdated, and I just feel frustrated every time I try to do things with it. Qt on the other hand.. I had to actually try Qt to realize how much better it was as a toolkit. They've got everything from dialog editors, to an IDE, a debugger, build tools, just everything, and it's all top-notch and highly maintained. The focus of the toolkit is application development, and they spend their time trying to help people do exactly that: make programs. Great support, great tools, and because of that, great toolkit. I just didn't want to alienate any developers by being stubborn about native widgets. There *are* some things that are rather lackluster about it and design choices I disagree with though. For example, I realize that to have an easy to use toolkit you have to have some level of code generation. However, in my personal and humble opinion, moc just feels like a terrible way to approach the problem. Even now I feel like there are a variety of ways you could handle code generation and automatic management of things like that. I don't like the idea of circumventing the language itself like that. It feels like one giant massive hack. -------------------------------------------------- Things that aren't working properly: -------------------------------------------------- - Settings dialog is not implemented. The dialog is complete but the code to handle the dialog hasn't been constructed yet. - There is a problem with using Qt widgets as a device target on windows, with at least OpenGL: if I have the preview widget automatically resize itself, it seems to cause some sort of video card failure that I don't understand. - Because of the above, resizing the preview widget has been disabled until I can figure out what's going on, so it's currently only a 32x32 area. - Direct3D doesn't seem to render correctly either, seems that the viewport is messed up or something. I'm sort of confused about what's going on with it. - The new main window seems to be triggering more race conditions than the wxWidgets main window dialog did. I'm not entirely sure what's going on here, but this may just be existing race conditions within libobs itself that I just never spotted before (even though I tend to be very thorough with race conditions any time I use variables cross-thread)
2014-01-23 18:53:55 +00:00
QAction *popupItem = new QAction(QT_UTF8(name), this);
popupItem->setData(QT_UTF8(type));
popup.addAction(popupItem);
Change the UI to Qt (work in progress) -------------------------------------------------- Notes and details -------------------------------------------------- Why was this done? Because wxWidgets was just lacking in many areas. I know wxWidgets is designed to be used with native controls, and that's great, but wxWidgets just is not a feature-complete toolkit for multiplatform applications. It lacks in dialog editors, its code is archaic and outdated, and I just feel frustrated every time I try to do things with it. Qt on the other hand.. I had to actually try Qt to realize how much better it was as a toolkit. They've got everything from dialog editors, to an IDE, a debugger, build tools, just everything, and it's all top-notch and highly maintained. The focus of the toolkit is application development, and they spend their time trying to help people do exactly that: make programs. Great support, great tools, and because of that, great toolkit. I just didn't want to alienate any developers by being stubborn about native widgets. There *are* some things that are rather lackluster about it and design choices I disagree with though. For example, I realize that to have an easy to use toolkit you have to have some level of code generation. However, in my personal and humble opinion, moc just feels like a terrible way to approach the problem. Even now I feel like there are a variety of ways you could handle code generation and automatic management of things like that. I don't like the idea of circumventing the language itself like that. It feels like one giant massive hack. -------------------------------------------------- Things that aren't working properly: -------------------------------------------------- - Settings dialog is not implemented. The dialog is complete but the code to handle the dialog hasn't been constructed yet. - There is a problem with using Qt widgets as a device target on windows, with at least OpenGL: if I have the preview widget automatically resize itself, it seems to cause some sort of video card failure that I don't understand. - Because of the above, resizing the preview widget has been disabled until I can figure out what's going on, so it's currently only a 32x32 area. - Direct3D doesn't seem to render correctly either, seems that the viewport is messed up or something. I'm sort of confused about what's going on with it. - The new main window seems to be triggering more race conditions than the wxWidgets main window dialog did. I'm not entirely sure what's going on here, but this may just be existing race conditions within libobs itself that I just never spotted before (even though I tend to be very thorough with race conditions any time I use variables cross-thread)
2014-01-23 18:53:55 +00:00
foundValues = true;
}
Change the UI to Qt (work in progress) -------------------------------------------------- Notes and details -------------------------------------------------- Why was this done? Because wxWidgets was just lacking in many areas. I know wxWidgets is designed to be used with native controls, and that's great, but wxWidgets just is not a feature-complete toolkit for multiplatform applications. It lacks in dialog editors, its code is archaic and outdated, and I just feel frustrated every time I try to do things with it. Qt on the other hand.. I had to actually try Qt to realize how much better it was as a toolkit. They've got everything from dialog editors, to an IDE, a debugger, build tools, just everything, and it's all top-notch and highly maintained. The focus of the toolkit is application development, and they spend their time trying to help people do exactly that: make programs. Great support, great tools, and because of that, great toolkit. I just didn't want to alienate any developers by being stubborn about native widgets. There *are* some things that are rather lackluster about it and design choices I disagree with though. For example, I realize that to have an easy to use toolkit you have to have some level of code generation. However, in my personal and humble opinion, moc just feels like a terrible way to approach the problem. Even now I feel like there are a variety of ways you could handle code generation and automatic management of things like that. I don't like the idea of circumventing the language itself like that. It feels like one giant massive hack. -------------------------------------------------- Things that aren't working properly: -------------------------------------------------- - Settings dialog is not implemented. The dialog is complete but the code to handle the dialog hasn't been constructed yet. - There is a problem with using Qt widgets as a device target on windows, with at least OpenGL: if I have the preview widget automatically resize itself, it seems to cause some sort of video card failure that I don't understand. - Because of the above, resizing the preview widget has been disabled until I can figure out what's going on, so it's currently only a 32x32 area. - Direct3D doesn't seem to render correctly either, seems that the viewport is messed up or something. I'm sort of confused about what's going on with it. - The new main window seems to be triggering more race conditions than the wxWidgets main window dialog did. I'm not entirely sure what's going on here, but this may just be existing race conditions within libobs itself that I just never spotted before (even though I tend to be very thorough with race conditions any time I use variables cross-thread)
2014-01-23 18:53:55 +00:00
if (foundValues) {
QAction *ret = popup.exec(pos);
if (ret)
AddSource(scene, ret->data().toString().toUtf8());
}
}
Change the UI to Qt (work in progress) -------------------------------------------------- Notes and details -------------------------------------------------- Why was this done? Because wxWidgets was just lacking in many areas. I know wxWidgets is designed to be used with native controls, and that's great, but wxWidgets just is not a feature-complete toolkit for multiplatform applications. It lacks in dialog editors, its code is archaic and outdated, and I just feel frustrated every time I try to do things with it. Qt on the other hand.. I had to actually try Qt to realize how much better it was as a toolkit. They've got everything from dialog editors, to an IDE, a debugger, build tools, just everything, and it's all top-notch and highly maintained. The focus of the toolkit is application development, and they spend their time trying to help people do exactly that: make programs. Great support, great tools, and because of that, great toolkit. I just didn't want to alienate any developers by being stubborn about native widgets. There *are* some things that are rather lackluster about it and design choices I disagree with though. For example, I realize that to have an easy to use toolkit you have to have some level of code generation. However, in my personal and humble opinion, moc just feels like a terrible way to approach the problem. Even now I feel like there are a variety of ways you could handle code generation and automatic management of things like that. I don't like the idea of circumventing the language itself like that. It feels like one giant massive hack. -------------------------------------------------- Things that aren't working properly: -------------------------------------------------- - Settings dialog is not implemented. The dialog is complete but the code to handle the dialog hasn't been constructed yet. - There is a problem with using Qt widgets as a device target on windows, with at least OpenGL: if I have the preview widget automatically resize itself, it seems to cause some sort of video card failure that I don't understand. - Because of the above, resizing the preview widget has been disabled until I can figure out what's going on, so it's currently only a 32x32 area. - Direct3D doesn't seem to render correctly either, seems that the viewport is messed up or something. I'm sort of confused about what's going on with it. - The new main window seems to be triggering more race conditions than the wxWidgets main window dialog did. I'm not entirely sure what's going on here, but this may just be existing race conditions within libobs itself that I just never spotted before (even though I tend to be very thorough with race conditions any time I use variables cross-thread)
2014-01-23 18:53:55 +00:00
void OBSBasic::on_actionAddSource_triggered()
{
Change the UI to Qt (work in progress) -------------------------------------------------- Notes and details -------------------------------------------------- Why was this done? Because wxWidgets was just lacking in many areas. I know wxWidgets is designed to be used with native controls, and that's great, but wxWidgets just is not a feature-complete toolkit for multiplatform applications. It lacks in dialog editors, its code is archaic and outdated, and I just feel frustrated every time I try to do things with it. Qt on the other hand.. I had to actually try Qt to realize how much better it was as a toolkit. They've got everything from dialog editors, to an IDE, a debugger, build tools, just everything, and it's all top-notch and highly maintained. The focus of the toolkit is application development, and they spend their time trying to help people do exactly that: make programs. Great support, great tools, and because of that, great toolkit. I just didn't want to alienate any developers by being stubborn about native widgets. There *are* some things that are rather lackluster about it and design choices I disagree with though. For example, I realize that to have an easy to use toolkit you have to have some level of code generation. However, in my personal and humble opinion, moc just feels like a terrible way to approach the problem. Even now I feel like there are a variety of ways you could handle code generation and automatic management of things like that. I don't like the idea of circumventing the language itself like that. It feels like one giant massive hack. -------------------------------------------------- Things that aren't working properly: -------------------------------------------------- - Settings dialog is not implemented. The dialog is complete but the code to handle the dialog hasn't been constructed yet. - There is a problem with using Qt widgets as a device target on windows, with at least OpenGL: if I have the preview widget automatically resize itself, it seems to cause some sort of video card failure that I don't understand. - Because of the above, resizing the preview widget has been disabled until I can figure out what's going on, so it's currently only a 32x32 area. - Direct3D doesn't seem to render correctly either, seems that the viewport is messed up or something. I'm sort of confused about what's going on with it. - The new main window seems to be triggering more race conditions than the wxWidgets main window dialog did. I'm not entirely sure what's going on here, but this may just be existing race conditions within libobs itself that I just never spotted before (even though I tend to be very thorough with race conditions any time I use variables cross-thread)
2014-01-23 18:53:55 +00:00
AddSourcePopupMenu(QCursor::pos());
}
Change the UI to Qt (work in progress) -------------------------------------------------- Notes and details -------------------------------------------------- Why was this done? Because wxWidgets was just lacking in many areas. I know wxWidgets is designed to be used with native controls, and that's great, but wxWidgets just is not a feature-complete toolkit for multiplatform applications. It lacks in dialog editors, its code is archaic and outdated, and I just feel frustrated every time I try to do things with it. Qt on the other hand.. I had to actually try Qt to realize how much better it was as a toolkit. They've got everything from dialog editors, to an IDE, a debugger, build tools, just everything, and it's all top-notch and highly maintained. The focus of the toolkit is application development, and they spend their time trying to help people do exactly that: make programs. Great support, great tools, and because of that, great toolkit. I just didn't want to alienate any developers by being stubborn about native widgets. There *are* some things that are rather lackluster about it and design choices I disagree with though. For example, I realize that to have an easy to use toolkit you have to have some level of code generation. However, in my personal and humble opinion, moc just feels like a terrible way to approach the problem. Even now I feel like there are a variety of ways you could handle code generation and automatic management of things like that. I don't like the idea of circumventing the language itself like that. It feels like one giant massive hack. -------------------------------------------------- Things that aren't working properly: -------------------------------------------------- - Settings dialog is not implemented. The dialog is complete but the code to handle the dialog hasn't been constructed yet. - There is a problem with using Qt widgets as a device target on windows, with at least OpenGL: if I have the preview widget automatically resize itself, it seems to cause some sort of video card failure that I don't understand. - Because of the above, resizing the preview widget has been disabled until I can figure out what's going on, so it's currently only a 32x32 area. - Direct3D doesn't seem to render correctly either, seems that the viewport is messed up or something. I'm sort of confused about what's going on with it. - The new main window seems to be triggering more race conditions than the wxWidgets main window dialog did. I'm not entirely sure what's going on here, but this may just be existing race conditions within libobs itself that I just never spotted before (even though I tend to be very thorough with race conditions any time I use variables cross-thread)
2014-01-23 18:53:55 +00:00
void OBSBasic::on_actionRemoveSource_triggered()
{
OBSSceneItem item = GetCurrentSceneItem();
if (item)
obs_sceneitem_remove(item);
}
Change the UI to Qt (work in progress) -------------------------------------------------- Notes and details -------------------------------------------------- Why was this done? Because wxWidgets was just lacking in many areas. I know wxWidgets is designed to be used with native controls, and that's great, but wxWidgets just is not a feature-complete toolkit for multiplatform applications. It lacks in dialog editors, its code is archaic and outdated, and I just feel frustrated every time I try to do things with it. Qt on the other hand.. I had to actually try Qt to realize how much better it was as a toolkit. They've got everything from dialog editors, to an IDE, a debugger, build tools, just everything, and it's all top-notch and highly maintained. The focus of the toolkit is application development, and they spend their time trying to help people do exactly that: make programs. Great support, great tools, and because of that, great toolkit. I just didn't want to alienate any developers by being stubborn about native widgets. There *are* some things that are rather lackluster about it and design choices I disagree with though. For example, I realize that to have an easy to use toolkit you have to have some level of code generation. However, in my personal and humble opinion, moc just feels like a terrible way to approach the problem. Even now I feel like there are a variety of ways you could handle code generation and automatic management of things like that. I don't like the idea of circumventing the language itself like that. It feels like one giant massive hack. -------------------------------------------------- Things that aren't working properly: -------------------------------------------------- - Settings dialog is not implemented. The dialog is complete but the code to handle the dialog hasn't been constructed yet. - There is a problem with using Qt widgets as a device target on windows, with at least OpenGL: if I have the preview widget automatically resize itself, it seems to cause some sort of video card failure that I don't understand. - Because of the above, resizing the preview widget has been disabled until I can figure out what's going on, so it's currently only a 32x32 area. - Direct3D doesn't seem to render correctly either, seems that the viewport is messed up or something. I'm sort of confused about what's going on with it. - The new main window seems to be triggering more race conditions than the wxWidgets main window dialog did. I'm not entirely sure what's going on here, but this may just be existing race conditions within libobs itself that I just never spotted before (even though I tend to be very thorough with race conditions any time I use variables cross-thread)
2014-01-23 18:53:55 +00:00
void OBSBasic::on_actionSourceProperties_triggered()
{
Add source properties window (very preliminary) - Add a properties window for sources so that you can now actually edit the settings for sources. Also, display the source by itself in the window (Note: not working on mac, and possibly not working on linux). When changing the settings for a source, it will call obs_source_update on that source when you have modified any values automatically. - Add a properties 'widget', eventually I want to turn this in to a regular nice properties view like you'd see in the designer, but right now it just uses a form layout in a QScrollArea with regular controls to display the properties. It's clunky but works for the time being. - Make it so that swap chains and the main graphics subsystem will automatically use at least one backbuffer if none was specified - Fix bug where displays weren't added to the main display array - Make it so that you can get the properties of a source via the actual pointer of a source/encoder/output in addition to being able to look up properties via identifier. - When registering source types, check for required functions (wasn't doing it before). getheight/getwidth should not be optional if it's a video source as well. - Add an RAII OBSObj wrapper to obs.hpp for non-reference-counted libobs pointers - Add an RAII OBSSignal wrapper to obs.hpp for libobs signals to automatically disconnect them on destruction - Move the "scale and center" calculation in window-basic-main.cpp to its own function and in its own source file - Add an 'update' callback to WASAPI audio sources
2014-03-23 08:07:54 +00:00
OBSSceneItem item = GetCurrentSceneItem();
OBSSource source = obs_sceneitem_getsource(item);
if (source) {
delete properties;
properties = new OBSBasicProperties(this, source);
properties->Init();
}
}
Change the UI to Qt (work in progress) -------------------------------------------------- Notes and details -------------------------------------------------- Why was this done? Because wxWidgets was just lacking in many areas. I know wxWidgets is designed to be used with native controls, and that's great, but wxWidgets just is not a feature-complete toolkit for multiplatform applications. It lacks in dialog editors, its code is archaic and outdated, and I just feel frustrated every time I try to do things with it. Qt on the other hand.. I had to actually try Qt to realize how much better it was as a toolkit. They've got everything from dialog editors, to an IDE, a debugger, build tools, just everything, and it's all top-notch and highly maintained. The focus of the toolkit is application development, and they spend their time trying to help people do exactly that: make programs. Great support, great tools, and because of that, great toolkit. I just didn't want to alienate any developers by being stubborn about native widgets. There *are* some things that are rather lackluster about it and design choices I disagree with though. For example, I realize that to have an easy to use toolkit you have to have some level of code generation. However, in my personal and humble opinion, moc just feels like a terrible way to approach the problem. Even now I feel like there are a variety of ways you could handle code generation and automatic management of things like that. I don't like the idea of circumventing the language itself like that. It feels like one giant massive hack. -------------------------------------------------- Things that aren't working properly: -------------------------------------------------- - Settings dialog is not implemented. The dialog is complete but the code to handle the dialog hasn't been constructed yet. - There is a problem with using Qt widgets as a device target on windows, with at least OpenGL: if I have the preview widget automatically resize itself, it seems to cause some sort of video card failure that I don't understand. - Because of the above, resizing the preview widget has been disabled until I can figure out what's going on, so it's currently only a 32x32 area. - Direct3D doesn't seem to render correctly either, seems that the viewport is messed up or something. I'm sort of confused about what's going on with it. - The new main window seems to be triggering more race conditions than the wxWidgets main window dialog did. I'm not entirely sure what's going on here, but this may just be existing race conditions within libobs itself that I just never spotted before (even though I tend to be very thorough with race conditions any time I use variables cross-thread)
2014-01-23 18:53:55 +00:00
void OBSBasic::on_actionSourceUp_triggered()
{
}
2013-12-10 18:22:33 +00:00
Change the UI to Qt (work in progress) -------------------------------------------------- Notes and details -------------------------------------------------- Why was this done? Because wxWidgets was just lacking in many areas. I know wxWidgets is designed to be used with native controls, and that's great, but wxWidgets just is not a feature-complete toolkit for multiplatform applications. It lacks in dialog editors, its code is archaic and outdated, and I just feel frustrated every time I try to do things with it. Qt on the other hand.. I had to actually try Qt to realize how much better it was as a toolkit. They've got everything from dialog editors, to an IDE, a debugger, build tools, just everything, and it's all top-notch and highly maintained. The focus of the toolkit is application development, and they spend their time trying to help people do exactly that: make programs. Great support, great tools, and because of that, great toolkit. I just didn't want to alienate any developers by being stubborn about native widgets. There *are* some things that are rather lackluster about it and design choices I disagree with though. For example, I realize that to have an easy to use toolkit you have to have some level of code generation. However, in my personal and humble opinion, moc just feels like a terrible way to approach the problem. Even now I feel like there are a variety of ways you could handle code generation and automatic management of things like that. I don't like the idea of circumventing the language itself like that. It feels like one giant massive hack. -------------------------------------------------- Things that aren't working properly: -------------------------------------------------- - Settings dialog is not implemented. The dialog is complete but the code to handle the dialog hasn't been constructed yet. - There is a problem with using Qt widgets as a device target on windows, with at least OpenGL: if I have the preview widget automatically resize itself, it seems to cause some sort of video card failure that I don't understand. - Because of the above, resizing the preview widget has been disabled until I can figure out what's going on, so it's currently only a 32x32 area. - Direct3D doesn't seem to render correctly either, seems that the viewport is messed up or something. I'm sort of confused about what's going on with it. - The new main window seems to be triggering more race conditions than the wxWidgets main window dialog did. I'm not entirely sure what's going on here, but this may just be existing race conditions within libobs itself that I just never spotted before (even though I tend to be very thorough with race conditions any time I use variables cross-thread)
2014-01-23 18:53:55 +00:00
void OBSBasic::on_actionSourceDown_triggered()
{
}
Implement RTMP module (still needs drop code) - Implement the RTMP output module. This time around, we just use a simple FLV muxer, then just write to the stream with RTMP_Write. Easy and effective. - Fix the FLV muxer, the muxer now outputs proper FLV packets. - Output API: * When using encoders, automatically interleave encoded packets before sending it to the output. * Pair encoders and have them automatically wait for the other to start to ensure sync. * Change 'obs_output_signal_start_fail' to 'obs_output_signal_stop' because it was a bit confusing, and doing this makes a lot more sense for outputs that need to stop suddenly (disconnections/etc). - Encoder API: * Remove some unnecessary encoder functions from the actual API and make them internal. Most of the encoder functions are handled automatically by outputs anyway, so there's no real need to expose them and end up inadvertently confusing plugin writers. * Have audio encoders wait for the video encoder to get a frame, then start at the exact data point that the first video frame starts to ensure the most accrate sync of video/audio possible. * Add a required 'frame_size' callback for audio encoders that returns the expected number of frames desired to encode with. This way, the libobs encoder API can handle the circular buffering internally automatically for the encoder modules, so encoder writers don't have to do it themselves. - Fix a few bugs in the serializer interface. It was passing the wrong variable for the data in a few cases. - If a source has video, make obs_source_update defer the actual update callback until the tick function is called to prevent threading issues.
2014-04-08 05:00:10 +00:00
void OBSBasic::OutputStop(int errorcode)
{
Implement RTMP module (still needs drop code) - Implement the RTMP output module. This time around, we just use a simple FLV muxer, then just write to the stream with RTMP_Write. Easy and effective. - Fix the FLV muxer, the muxer now outputs proper FLV packets. - Output API: * When using encoders, automatically interleave encoded packets before sending it to the output. * Pair encoders and have them automatically wait for the other to start to ensure sync. * Change 'obs_output_signal_start_fail' to 'obs_output_signal_stop' because it was a bit confusing, and doing this makes a lot more sense for outputs that need to stop suddenly (disconnections/etc). - Encoder API: * Remove some unnecessary encoder functions from the actual API and make them internal. Most of the encoder functions are handled automatically by outputs anyway, so there's no real need to expose them and end up inadvertently confusing plugin writers. * Have audio encoders wait for the video encoder to get a frame, then start at the exact data point that the first video frame starts to ensure the most accrate sync of video/audio possible. * Add a required 'frame_size' callback for audio encoders that returns the expected number of frames desired to encode with. This way, the libobs encoder API can handle the circular buffering internally automatically for the encoder modules, so encoder writers don't have to do it themselves. - Fix a few bugs in the serializer interface. It was passing the wrong variable for the data in a few cases. - If a source has video, make obs_source_update defer the actual update callback until the tick function is called to prevent threading issues.
2014-04-08 05:00:10 +00:00
UNUSED_PARAMETER(errorcode);
ui->streamButton->setText("Start Streaming");
}
Implement RTMP module (still needs drop code) - Implement the RTMP output module. This time around, we just use a simple FLV muxer, then just write to the stream with RTMP_Write. Easy and effective. - Fix the FLV muxer, the muxer now outputs proper FLV packets. - Output API: * When using encoders, automatically interleave encoded packets before sending it to the output. * Pair encoders and have them automatically wait for the other to start to ensure sync. * Change 'obs_output_signal_start_fail' to 'obs_output_signal_stop' because it was a bit confusing, and doing this makes a lot more sense for outputs that need to stop suddenly (disconnections/etc). - Encoder API: * Remove some unnecessary encoder functions from the actual API and make them internal. Most of the encoder functions are handled automatically by outputs anyway, so there's no real need to expose them and end up inadvertently confusing plugin writers. * Have audio encoders wait for the video encoder to get a frame, then start at the exact data point that the first video frame starts to ensure the most accrate sync of video/audio possible. * Add a required 'frame_size' callback for audio encoders that returns the expected number of frames desired to encode with. This way, the libobs encoder API can handle the circular buffering internally automatically for the encoder modules, so encoder writers don't have to do it themselves. - Fix a few bugs in the serializer interface. It was passing the wrong variable for the data in a few cases. - If a source has video, make obs_source_update defer the actual update callback until the tick function is called to prevent threading issues.
2014-04-08 05:00:10 +00:00
void OBSBasic::OutputStart()
{
ui->streamButton->setText("Stop Streaming");
}
static void OBSOutputStart(void *data, calldata_t params)
{
Implement RTMP module (still needs drop code) - Implement the RTMP output module. This time around, we just use a simple FLV muxer, then just write to the stream with RTMP_Write. Easy and effective. - Fix the FLV muxer, the muxer now outputs proper FLV packets. - Output API: * When using encoders, automatically interleave encoded packets before sending it to the output. * Pair encoders and have them automatically wait for the other to start to ensure sync. * Change 'obs_output_signal_start_fail' to 'obs_output_signal_stop' because it was a bit confusing, and doing this makes a lot more sense for outputs that need to stop suddenly (disconnections/etc). - Encoder API: * Remove some unnecessary encoder functions from the actual API and make them internal. Most of the encoder functions are handled automatically by outputs anyway, so there's no real need to expose them and end up inadvertently confusing plugin writers. * Have audio encoders wait for the video encoder to get a frame, then start at the exact data point that the first video frame starts to ensure the most accrate sync of video/audio possible. * Add a required 'frame_size' callback for audio encoders that returns the expected number of frames desired to encode with. This way, the libobs encoder API can handle the circular buffering internally automatically for the encoder modules, so encoder writers don't have to do it themselves. - Fix a few bugs in the serializer interface. It was passing the wrong variable for the data in a few cases. - If a source has video, make obs_source_update defer the actual update callback until the tick function is called to prevent threading issues.
2014-04-08 05:00:10 +00:00
UNUSED_PARAMETER(params);
QMetaObject::invokeMethod(static_cast<OBSBasic*>(data), "OutputStart");
}
Implement RTMP module (still needs drop code) - Implement the RTMP output module. This time around, we just use a simple FLV muxer, then just write to the stream with RTMP_Write. Easy and effective. - Fix the FLV muxer, the muxer now outputs proper FLV packets. - Output API: * When using encoders, automatically interleave encoded packets before sending it to the output. * Pair encoders and have them automatically wait for the other to start to ensure sync. * Change 'obs_output_signal_start_fail' to 'obs_output_signal_stop' because it was a bit confusing, and doing this makes a lot more sense for outputs that need to stop suddenly (disconnections/etc). - Encoder API: * Remove some unnecessary encoder functions from the actual API and make them internal. Most of the encoder functions are handled automatically by outputs anyway, so there's no real need to expose them and end up inadvertently confusing plugin writers. * Have audio encoders wait for the video encoder to get a frame, then start at the exact data point that the first video frame starts to ensure the most accrate sync of video/audio possible. * Add a required 'frame_size' callback for audio encoders that returns the expected number of frames desired to encode with. This way, the libobs encoder API can handle the circular buffering internally automatically for the encoder modules, so encoder writers don't have to do it themselves. - Fix a few bugs in the serializer interface. It was passing the wrong variable for the data in a few cases. - If a source has video, make obs_source_update defer the actual update callback until the tick function is called to prevent threading issues.
2014-04-08 05:00:10 +00:00
static void OBSOutputStop(void *data, calldata_t params)
{
int code = (int)calldata_int(params, "errorcode");
QMetaObject::invokeMethod(static_cast<OBSBasic*>(data), "OutputStop",
Q_ARG(int, code));
}
2014-04-14 09:22:09 +00:00
void OBSBasic::TempFileOutput(const char *path, int vBitrate, int aBitrate)
{
obs_data_t data = obs_data_create();
obs_data_setstring(data, "filename", path);
obs_data_setint(data, "audio_bitrate", aBitrate);
obs_data_setint(data, "video_bitrate", vBitrate);
outputTest = obs_output_create("ffmpeg_output", "test", data);
obs_data_release(data);
}
void OBSBasic::TempStreamOutput(const char *url, const char *key,
int vBitrate, int aBitrate)
{
obs_data_t aac_settings = obs_data_create();
obs_data_t x264_settings = obs_data_create();
obs_data_t output_settings = obs_data_create();
stringstream ss;
ss << "filler=1:crf=0:bitrate=" << vBitrate;
obs_data_setint(aac_settings, "bitrate", aBitrate);
obs_data_setint(x264_settings, "bitrate", vBitrate);
obs_data_setint(x264_settings, "buffer_size", vBitrate);
obs_data_setint(x264_settings, "keyint_sec", 2);
obs_data_setstring(x264_settings, "x264opts", ss.str().c_str());
obs_data_setstring(output_settings, "path", url);
obs_data_setstring(output_settings, "key", key);
aac = obs_audio_encoder_create("ffmpeg_aac", "blabla1",
aac_settings, obs_audio());
x264 = obs_video_encoder_create("obs_x264", "blabla2",
x264_settings, obs_video());
outputTest = obs_output_create("rtmp_output", "test", output_settings);
obs_output_set_video_encoder(outputTest, x264);
obs_output_set_audio_encoder(outputTest, aac);
obs_data_release(aac_settings);
obs_data_release(x264_settings);
obs_data_release(output_settings);
}
/* TODO: lots of temporary code */
void OBSBasic::on_streamButton_clicked()
{
Implement RTMP module (still needs drop code) - Implement the RTMP output module. This time around, we just use a simple FLV muxer, then just write to the stream with RTMP_Write. Easy and effective. - Fix the FLV muxer, the muxer now outputs proper FLV packets. - Output API: * When using encoders, automatically interleave encoded packets before sending it to the output. * Pair encoders and have them automatically wait for the other to start to ensure sync. * Change 'obs_output_signal_start_fail' to 'obs_output_signal_stop' because it was a bit confusing, and doing this makes a lot more sense for outputs that need to stop suddenly (disconnections/etc). - Encoder API: * Remove some unnecessary encoder functions from the actual API and make them internal. Most of the encoder functions are handled automatically by outputs anyway, so there's no real need to expose them and end up inadvertently confusing plugin writers. * Have audio encoders wait for the video encoder to get a frame, then start at the exact data point that the first video frame starts to ensure the most accrate sync of video/audio possible. * Add a required 'frame_size' callback for audio encoders that returns the expected number of frames desired to encode with. This way, the libobs encoder API can handle the circular buffering internally automatically for the encoder modules, so encoder writers don't have to do it themselves. - Fix a few bugs in the serializer interface. It was passing the wrong variable for the data in a few cases. - If a source has video, make obs_source_update defer the actual update callback until the tick function is called to prevent threading issues.
2014-04-08 05:00:10 +00:00
if (obs_output_active(outputTest)) {
obs_output_stop(outputTest);
} else {
const char *url = config_get_string(basicConfig, "OutputTemp",
"URL");
const char *key = config_get_string(basicConfig, "OutputTemp",
"Key");
int vBitrate = config_get_uint(basicConfig, "OutputTemp",
"VBitrate");
int aBitrate = config_get_uint(basicConfig, "OutputTemp",
"ABitrate");
if (!url)
return;
Implement RTMP module (still needs drop code) - Implement the RTMP output module. This time around, we just use a simple FLV muxer, then just write to the stream with RTMP_Write. Easy and effective. - Fix the FLV muxer, the muxer now outputs proper FLV packets. - Output API: * When using encoders, automatically interleave encoded packets before sending it to the output. * Pair encoders and have them automatically wait for the other to start to ensure sync. * Change 'obs_output_signal_start_fail' to 'obs_output_signal_stop' because it was a bit confusing, and doing this makes a lot more sense for outputs that need to stop suddenly (disconnections/etc). - Encoder API: * Remove some unnecessary encoder functions from the actual API and make them internal. Most of the encoder functions are handled automatically by outputs anyway, so there's no real need to expose them and end up inadvertently confusing plugin writers. * Have audio encoders wait for the video encoder to get a frame, then start at the exact data point that the first video frame starts to ensure the most accrate sync of video/audio possible. * Add a required 'frame_size' callback for audio encoders that returns the expected number of frames desired to encode with. This way, the libobs encoder API can handle the circular buffering internally automatically for the encoder modules, so encoder writers don't have to do it themselves. - Fix a few bugs in the serializer interface. It was passing the wrong variable for the data in a few cases. - If a source has video, make obs_source_update defer the actual update callback until the tick function is called to prevent threading issues.
2014-04-08 05:00:10 +00:00
obs_output_destroy(outputTest);
obs_encoder_destroy(aac);
obs_encoder_destroy(x264);
outputTest = nullptr;
aac = nullptr;
x264 = nullptr;
2014-04-14 09:22:09 +00:00
if (strstr(url, "rtmp://") != NULL)
TempStreamOutput(url, key, vBitrate, aBitrate);
else
TempFileOutput(url, vBitrate, aBitrate);
Implement RTMP module (still needs drop code) - Implement the RTMP output module. This time around, we just use a simple FLV muxer, then just write to the stream with RTMP_Write. Easy and effective. - Fix the FLV muxer, the muxer now outputs proper FLV packets. - Output API: * When using encoders, automatically interleave encoded packets before sending it to the output. * Pair encoders and have them automatically wait for the other to start to ensure sync. * Change 'obs_output_signal_start_fail' to 'obs_output_signal_stop' because it was a bit confusing, and doing this makes a lot more sense for outputs that need to stop suddenly (disconnections/etc). - Encoder API: * Remove some unnecessary encoder functions from the actual API and make them internal. Most of the encoder functions are handled automatically by outputs anyway, so there's no real need to expose them and end up inadvertently confusing plugin writers. * Have audio encoders wait for the video encoder to get a frame, then start at the exact data point that the first video frame starts to ensure the most accrate sync of video/audio possible. * Add a required 'frame_size' callback for audio encoders that returns the expected number of frames desired to encode with. This way, the libobs encoder API can handle the circular buffering internally automatically for the encoder modules, so encoder writers don't have to do it themselves. - Fix a few bugs in the serializer interface. It was passing the wrong variable for the data in a few cases. - If a source has video, make obs_source_update defer the actual update callback until the tick function is called to prevent threading issues.
2014-04-08 05:00:10 +00:00
if (!outputTest) {
OutputStop(OBS_OUTPUT_FAIL);
return;
Implement RTMP module (still needs drop code) - Implement the RTMP output module. This time around, we just use a simple FLV muxer, then just write to the stream with RTMP_Write. Easy and effective. - Fix the FLV muxer, the muxer now outputs proper FLV packets. - Output API: * When using encoders, automatically interleave encoded packets before sending it to the output. * Pair encoders and have them automatically wait for the other to start to ensure sync. * Change 'obs_output_signal_start_fail' to 'obs_output_signal_stop' because it was a bit confusing, and doing this makes a lot more sense for outputs that need to stop suddenly (disconnections/etc). - Encoder API: * Remove some unnecessary encoder functions from the actual API and make them internal. Most of the encoder functions are handled automatically by outputs anyway, so there's no real need to expose them and end up inadvertently confusing plugin writers. * Have audio encoders wait for the video encoder to get a frame, then start at the exact data point that the first video frame starts to ensure the most accrate sync of video/audio possible. * Add a required 'frame_size' callback for audio encoders that returns the expected number of frames desired to encode with. This way, the libobs encoder API can handle the circular buffering internally automatically for the encoder modules, so encoder writers don't have to do it themselves. - Fix a few bugs in the serializer interface. It was passing the wrong variable for the data in a few cases. - If a source has video, make obs_source_update defer the actual update callback until the tick function is called to prevent threading issues.
2014-04-08 05:00:10 +00:00
}
signal_handler_connect(obs_output_signalhandler(outputTest),
"start", OBSOutputStart, this);
Implement RTMP module (still needs drop code) - Implement the RTMP output module. This time around, we just use a simple FLV muxer, then just write to the stream with RTMP_Write. Easy and effective. - Fix the FLV muxer, the muxer now outputs proper FLV packets. - Output API: * When using encoders, automatically interleave encoded packets before sending it to the output. * Pair encoders and have them automatically wait for the other to start to ensure sync. * Change 'obs_output_signal_start_fail' to 'obs_output_signal_stop' because it was a bit confusing, and doing this makes a lot more sense for outputs that need to stop suddenly (disconnections/etc). - Encoder API: * Remove some unnecessary encoder functions from the actual API and make them internal. Most of the encoder functions are handled automatically by outputs anyway, so there's no real need to expose them and end up inadvertently confusing plugin writers. * Have audio encoders wait for the video encoder to get a frame, then start at the exact data point that the first video frame starts to ensure the most accrate sync of video/audio possible. * Add a required 'frame_size' callback for audio encoders that returns the expected number of frames desired to encode with. This way, the libobs encoder API can handle the circular buffering internally automatically for the encoder modules, so encoder writers don't have to do it themselves. - Fix a few bugs in the serializer interface. It was passing the wrong variable for the data in a few cases. - If a source has video, make obs_source_update defer the actual update callback until the tick function is called to prevent threading issues.
2014-04-08 05:00:10 +00:00
signal_handler_connect(obs_output_signalhandler(outputTest),
"stop", OBSOutputStop, this);
obs_output_start(outputTest);
}
}
Change the UI to Qt (work in progress) -------------------------------------------------- Notes and details -------------------------------------------------- Why was this done? Because wxWidgets was just lacking in many areas. I know wxWidgets is designed to be used with native controls, and that's great, but wxWidgets just is not a feature-complete toolkit for multiplatform applications. It lacks in dialog editors, its code is archaic and outdated, and I just feel frustrated every time I try to do things with it. Qt on the other hand.. I had to actually try Qt to realize how much better it was as a toolkit. They've got everything from dialog editors, to an IDE, a debugger, build tools, just everything, and it's all top-notch and highly maintained. The focus of the toolkit is application development, and they spend their time trying to help people do exactly that: make programs. Great support, great tools, and because of that, great toolkit. I just didn't want to alienate any developers by being stubborn about native widgets. There *are* some things that are rather lackluster about it and design choices I disagree with though. For example, I realize that to have an easy to use toolkit you have to have some level of code generation. However, in my personal and humble opinion, moc just feels like a terrible way to approach the problem. Even now I feel like there are a variety of ways you could handle code generation and automatic management of things like that. I don't like the idea of circumventing the language itself like that. It feels like one giant massive hack. -------------------------------------------------- Things that aren't working properly: -------------------------------------------------- - Settings dialog is not implemented. The dialog is complete but the code to handle the dialog hasn't been constructed yet. - There is a problem with using Qt widgets as a device target on windows, with at least OpenGL: if I have the preview widget automatically resize itself, it seems to cause some sort of video card failure that I don't understand. - Because of the above, resizing the preview widget has been disabled until I can figure out what's going on, so it's currently only a 32x32 area. - Direct3D doesn't seem to render correctly either, seems that the viewport is messed up or something. I'm sort of confused about what's going on with it. - The new main window seems to be triggering more race conditions than the wxWidgets main window dialog did. I'm not entirely sure what's going on here, but this may just be existing race conditions within libobs itself that I just never spotted before (even though I tend to be very thorough with race conditions any time I use variables cross-thread)
2014-01-23 18:53:55 +00:00
void OBSBasic::on_settingsButton_clicked()
2013-12-10 18:22:33 +00:00
{
OBSBasicSettings settings(this);
settings.exec();
2013-12-10 18:22:33 +00:00
}
void OBSBasic::GetFPSCommon(uint32_t &num, uint32_t &den) const
{
const char *val = config_get_string(basicConfig, "Video", "FPSCommon");
if (strcmp(val, "10") == 0) {
num = 10;
den = 1;
} else if (strcmp(val, "20") == 0) {
num = 20;
den = 1;
} else if (strcmp(val, "25") == 0) {
num = 25;
den = 1;
} else if (strcmp(val, "29.97") == 0) {
num = 30000;
den = 1001;
} else if (strcmp(val, "48") == 0) {
num = 48;
den = 1;
} else if (strcmp(val, "59.94") == 0) {
num = 60000;
den = 1001;
} else if (strcmp(val, "60") == 0) {
num = 60;
den = 1;
} else {
num = 30;
den = 1;
}
}
void OBSBasic::GetFPSInteger(uint32_t &num, uint32_t &den) const
{
num = (uint32_t)config_get_uint(basicConfig, "Video", "FPSInt");
den = 1;
}
void OBSBasic::GetFPSFraction(uint32_t &num, uint32_t &den) const
{
num = (uint32_t)config_get_uint(basicConfig, "Video", "FPSNum");
den = (uint32_t)config_get_uint(basicConfig, "Video", "FPSDen");
}
void OBSBasic::GetFPSNanoseconds(uint32_t &num, uint32_t &den) const
{
num = 1000000000;
den = (uint32_t)config_get_uint(basicConfig, "Video", "FPSNS");
}
void OBSBasic::GetConfigFPS(uint32_t &num, uint32_t &den) const
{
uint32_t type = config_get_uint(basicConfig, "Video", "FPSType");
if (type == 1) //"Integer"
GetFPSInteger(num, den);
else if (type == 2) //"Fraction"
GetFPSFraction(num, den);
else if (false) //"Nanoseconds", currently not implemented
GetFPSNanoseconds(num, den);
else
GetFPSCommon(num, den);
}
config_t OBSBasic::Config() const
{
return basicConfig;
}