friendica-addons-sekb/dav/SabreDAV/docs/draft-daboo-carddav-directory-gateway-02.txt

561 lines
18 KiB
Text
Raw Normal View History

2012-06-03 18:19:28 +00:00
Network Working Group C. Daboo
Internet-Draft Apple Inc.
Updates: XXXX-CardDAV August 24, 2010
(if approved)
Intended status: Standards Track
Expires: February 25, 2011
CardDAV Directory Gateway Extension
draft-daboo-carddav-directory-gateway-02
Abstract
This document defines an extension to the vCard Extensions to WebDAV
(CardDAV) protocol that allows a server to expose a directory as a
read-only address book collection.
Status of this Memo
This Internet-Draft is submitted in full conformance with the
provisions of BCP 78 and BCP 79.
Internet-Drafts are working documents of the Internet Engineering
Task Force (IETF). Note that other groups may also distribute
working documents as Internet-Drafts. The list of current Internet-
Drafts is at http://datatracker.ietf.org/drafts/current/.
Internet-Drafts are draft documents valid for a maximum of six months
and may be updated, replaced, or obsoleted by other documents at any
time. It is inappropriate to use Internet-Drafts as reference
material or to cite them other than as "work in progress."
This Internet-Draft will expire on February 25, 2011.
Copyright Notice
Copyright (c) 2010 IETF Trust and the persons identified as the
document authors. All rights reserved.
This document is subject to BCP 78 and the IETF Trust's Legal
Provisions Relating to IETF Documents
(http://trustee.ietf.org/license-info) in effect on the date of
publication of this document. Please review these documents
carefully, as they describe your rights and restrictions with respect
to this document. Code Components extracted from this document must
include Simplified BSD License text as described in Section 4.e of
the Trust Legal Provisions and are provided without warranty as
described in the Simplified BSD License.
Daboo Expires February 25, 2011 [Page 1]
Internet-Draft CardDAV Directory Gateway Extension August 2010
Table of Contents
1. Introduction and Overview . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
2. Conventions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
3. CARDDAV:directory-gateway Property . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
4. XML Element Definitions . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
4.1. CARDDAV:directory . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
5. Client Guidelines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
6. Server Guidelines . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
7. Security Considerations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
8. IANA Consideration . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
9. Acknowledgments . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
10. References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
10.1. Normative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
10.2. Informative References . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
Appendix A. Change History (to be removed prior to
publication as an RFC) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 9
Author's Address . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
Daboo Expires February 25, 2011 [Page 2]
Internet-Draft CardDAV Directory Gateway Extension August 2010
1. Introduction and Overview
The CardDAV [I-D.ietf-vcarddav-carddav] protocol defines a standard
way of accessing, managing, and sharing contact information based on
the vCard [RFC2426] format. Often, in an enterprise or service
provider environment, a directory of all users hosted on the server
(or elsewhere) is available (for example via Lightweight Directory
Access Protocol (LDAP) [RFC4510] or some direct database access). It
would be convenient for CardDAV clients if this directory were
exposed as a "global" address book on the CardDAV server so it could
be searched in the same way as personal address books are. This
specification defines a "directory gateway" feature extension to
CardDAV to enable this.
This specification adds one new WebDAV property to principal
resources that contains the URL to one or more directory gateway
address book collection resources. It is important for clients to be
able to distinguish this address book collection from others because
there are specific limitations involved in using it as described
below. To aid that, this specification defines an XML element that
can be included as a child element of the DAV:resourcetype property
of address book collections to identify them as directory gateways.
Note that this feature is in no way intended to replace full
directory access - it is meant to simply provide a convenient way for
CardDAV clients to query contact-related attributes in directory
records.
2. Conventions
The key words "MUST", "MUST NOT", "REQUIRED", "SHALL", "SHALL NOT",
"SHOULD", "SHOULD NOT", "RECOMMENDED", "MAY", and "OPTIONAL" in this
document are to be interpreted as described in [RFC2119].
The term "protected" is used in the Conformance field of property
definitions as defined in Section 15 of [RFC4918].
This document uses XML DTD fragments ([W3C.REC-xml-20081126], Section
3.2) as a purely notational convention. WebDAV request and response
bodies cannot be validated by a DTD due to the specific extensibility
rules defined in Section 17 of [RFC4918] and due to the fact that all
XML elements defined by this specification use the XML namespace name
"DAV:". In particular:
1. element names use the "DAV:" namespace,
Daboo Expires February 25, 2011 [Page 3]
Internet-Draft CardDAV Directory Gateway Extension August 2010
2. element ordering is irrelevant unless explicitly stated,
3. extension elements (elements not already defined as valid child
elements) may be added anywhere, except when explicitly stated
otherwise,
4. extension attributes (attributes not already defined as valid for
this element) may be added anywhere, except when explicitly
stated otherwise.
When XML element types in the namespaces "DAV:" and
"urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:carddav" are referenced in this document
outside of the context of an XML fragment, the strings "DAV:" and
"CARDDAV:" will be prefixed to the element types, respectively.
3. CARDDAV:directory-gateway Property
Name: directory-gateway
Namespace: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:carddav
Purpose: Identifies URLs of CardDAV address book collections acting
as a directory gateway for the server.
Protected: MUST be protected.
allprop behavior: SHOULD NOT be returned by a PROPFIND DAV:allprop
request.
Description: The CARDDAV:directory-gateway identifies address book
collection resources that are directory gateway address books for
the server.
Definition:
<!ELEMENT directory-gateway (DAV:href*)>
Example:
<C:directory-gateway xmlns:D="DAV:"
xmlns:C="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:carddav">
<D:href>/directory</D:href>
</C:directory-gateway>
Daboo Expires February 25, 2011 [Page 4]
Internet-Draft CardDAV Directory Gateway Extension August 2010
4. XML Element Definitions
4.1. CARDDAV:directory
Name: directory
Namespace: urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:carddav
Purpose: Used to indicate that an address book collection is a
directory gateway.
Description: This element appears in the DAV:resourcetype property
on a address book collection resources that are directory
gateways. Clients can use the presence of this element to
identify directory gateway collections when doing PROPFINDs to
list collection contents.
Definition:
<!ELEMENT directory EMPTY>
Example:
<D:resourcetype xmlns:D="DAV:"
xmlns:C="urn:ietf:params:xml:ns:carddav">
<D:collection/>
<C:addressbook/>
<C:directory/>
</D:resourcetype>
5. Client Guidelines
Clients wishing to make use of directory gateway address books can
request the CARDDAV:directory-gateway property (Section 3) when
examining other properties on the principal resource for the user.
If the property is not present, then the directory gateway feature is
not supported by the server at that time.
Clients can also detect the presence of directory gateway address
book collections by retrieving the DAV:resourcetype property on
collections that it lists, and look for the presence of the CARDDAV:
directory element (Section 4.1).
Since the directory being exposed via a directory gateway address
book collection could be large, clients SHOULD limit the number of
results returned in an CARDDAV:addressbook-query REPORT as defined in
Section 8.6.1 of [I-D.ietf-vcarddav-carddav].
Daboo Expires February 25, 2011 [Page 5]
Internet-Draft CardDAV Directory Gateway Extension August 2010
Clients MUST treat the directory gateway address book collection as a
read-only collection, so HTTP methods that modify resource data or
properties in the address book collection MUST NOT be used.
Clients SHOULD NOT attempt to cache the entire contents of the
directory gateway address book collection resource by retrieving all
resources, or trying to examine all the properties of all resources
(e.g., via a PROPFIND Depth:1 request). Instead, CARDDAV:
addressbook-query REPORTs are used to search for specific address
book object resources, and CARDDAV:multiget REPORTs and individual
GET requests can be made to retrieve the actual vCard data for
address book object resources found via a query.
When presenting directory gateway collections to the user, clients
SHOULD use the DAV:displayname property on the corresponding address
book collections as the name of the directory gateway. This is
important in the case where more than one directory gateway is
available. Clients MAY also provide descriptive information about
each directory gateway by examining the CARDDAV:addressbook-
description property (see Section 6.2.1 of
[I-D.ietf-vcarddav-carddav]) on the resource.
6. Server Guidelines
Servers wishing to expose a directory gateway as an address book
collection MUST include the CARDDAV:directory-gateway property on all
principal resources of users expected to use the feature.
Since the directory being exposed via the directory gateway address
book collection could be large, servers SHOULD truncate the number of
results returned in an CARDDAV:addressbook-query REPORT as defined in
Section 8.6.2 of [I-D.ietf-vcarddav-carddav]. In addition, servers
SHOULD disallow requests that effectively enumerate the collection
contents (e.g., PROPFIND Depth:1, trivial CARDDAV:addressbook-query,
DAV:sync-collection REPORT).
Servers need to expose the directory information as a set of address
book object resources in the directory gateway address book
collection resource. To do that, a mapping between the directory
record format and the vCard data has to be applied. In general, only
directory record attributes that have a direct equivalent in vCard
SHOULD be mapped. It is up to individual implementations to
determine which attributes to map. But in all cases servers MUST
generate valid vCard data as returned to the client. In addition, as
required by CardDAV, the UID vCard property MUST be present in the
vCard data, and this value MUST be persistent from query to query for
the same directory record.
Daboo Expires February 25, 2011 [Page 6]
Internet-Draft CardDAV Directory Gateway Extension August 2010
Multiple directory sources could be available to the server. The
server MAY use a single directory gateway resource to aggregate
results from each directory source. When doing so care is needed
when dealing with potential records that refer to the same entity.
Servers MAY suppress any duplicates that they are able to determine
themselves. Alternatively, multiple directory sources can be exposed
as separate directory gateway resources.
For any directory source, a server MAY expose multiple directory
gateway resources where each represents a different query "scope" for
the directory. Different scopes MAY be offered to different
principals on the server. For example, the server might expose an
entire company directory for searching as the resource "/directory-
all" to all principals, but then provide "/directory-department-XYZ"
as another directory gateway that has a search scope that implicitly
limits the search results to just the "XYZ" department. Users in
that department would then have a CARDDAV:directory-gateway property
on their principal resource that included the "/directory-department-
XYZ" resource. Users in other departments would have corresponding
directory gateway resources available to them.
Records in a directory can include data for more than just people,
e.g, resources such as rooms or projectors, groups, computer systems
etc. It is up to individual implementations to determine the most
appropriate "scope" for the data returned via the directory gateway
by filtering the appropriate record types. As above, servers could
choose to expose people and resources under different directory
gateway resources by implicitly limiting the search "scope" for each
of those.
Servers MAY apply implementation defined access rules to determine,
on a per-user basis, what records are returned to a particularly user
and the content of those records exposed via vCard data. This per-
user behavior is in addition to the general security requirements
detailed below.
When multiple directory gateway collections are present, servers
SHOULD provide a DAV:displayname property on each that disambiguates
them. Servers MAY include a CARDDAV:addressbook-description property
(see Section 6.2.1 of [I-D.ietf-vcarddav-carddav]) on each directory
gateway resource to provide a description of the directory and any
search "scope" that might be used, or any other useful information
for users.
7. Security Considerations
Servers MUST ensure that client requests against the directory
Daboo Expires February 25, 2011 [Page 7]
Internet-Draft CardDAV Directory Gateway Extension August 2010
gateway address book collection cannot use excessive resources (CPU,
memory, network bandwidth etc), given that the directory could be
large.
Servers MUST take care not to expose sensitive directory record
attributes in the vCard data via the directory gateway address book.
In general only those properties that have direct correspondence in
vCard SHOULD be exposed.
Servers need to determine whether it is appropriate for the directory
information to be available via CardDAV to unauthenticated users. If
not, servers MUST ensure that unauthenticated users do not have
access to the directory gateway address book object resource and its
contents. If unauthenticated access is allowed, servers MAY choose
to limit the set of vCard properties that are searchable or returned
in the address book object resources when unauthenticated requests
are made.
8. IANA Consideration
This document does not require any actions on the part of IANA.
9. Acknowledgments
10. References
10.1. Normative References
[I-D.ietf-vcarddav-carddav]
Daboo, C., "vCard Extensions to WebDAV (CardDAV)",
draft-ietf-vcarddav-carddav-10 (work in progress),
November 2009.
[RFC2119] Bradner, S., "Key words for use in RFCs to Indicate
Requirement Levels", BCP 14, RFC 2119, March 1997.
[RFC2426] Dawson, F. and T. Howes, "vCard MIME Directory Profile",
RFC 2426, September 1998.
[RFC4918] Dusseault, L., "HTTP Extensions for Web Distributed
Authoring and Versioning (WebDAV)", RFC 4918, June 2007.
[W3C.REC-xml-20081126]
Paoli, J., Yergeau, F., Bray, T., Sperberg-McQueen, C.,
and E. Maler, "Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0 (Fifth
Daboo Expires February 25, 2011 [Page 8]
Internet-Draft CardDAV Directory Gateway Extension August 2010
Edition)", World Wide Web Consortium Recommendation REC-
xml-20081126, November 2008,
<http://www.w3.org/TR/2008/REC-xml-20081126>.
10.2. Informative References
[RFC4510] Zeilenga, K., "Lightweight Directory Access Protocol
(LDAP): Technical Specification Road Map", RFC 4510,
June 2006.
Appendix A. Change History (to be removed prior to publication as an
RFC)
Changes in -02
1. Added CARDDAV:directory element for use in DAV:resourcetype
2. Allow CARDDAV:directory-gateway to be multi-valued
3. Explain how a server could implicit "scope" queries on different
directory gateway resources
Changes in -01
1. Remove duplicated text in a couple of sections
2. Add example of LDAP/generic database as possible directory
"sources"
3. Add text to explain why the client needs to treat this as special
and thus the need for a property
4. Added text to server guidelines indicating requirements for
handling vCard UID properties
5. Added text to server guidelines explain that different record
"types" may exist in the directory and the server is free to
filter those as appropriate
6. Added text to server guidelines indicating that server are free
to aggregate directory records from multiple sources
7. Added text to server guidelines indicating that servers are free
to apply implementation defined access control to the returned
data on a per-user basis
Daboo Expires February 25, 2011 [Page 9]
Internet-Draft CardDAV Directory Gateway Extension August 2010
Author's Address
Cyrus Daboo
Apple Inc.
1 Infinite Loop
Cupertino, CA 95014
USA
Email: cyrus@daboo.name
URI: http://www.apple.com/
Daboo Expires February 25, 2011 [Page 10]